Literature DB >> 22942588

Improving the Standard of Operative Notes within an Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Department, using an Operative Note Proforma.

Karl Payne1, Keith Jones, Andrew Dickenson.   

Abstract

AIM: The operative note needs to be an accurate and legible account of events occurring in the surgeon's theatre. We set out to discover if operative notes within a British District General Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery department adhered to Royal College of Surgeons (England) guidelines.
METHOD: We audited 100 consecutive Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery operations performed within general theatres. As an intervention we designed and piloted a paper based Operative Note Proforma and re-audit was undertaken.
RESULTS: Initial audit showed results lacking in certain areas. At re-audit all audit criteria showed improvement. The mean percentage of data point inclusion rose from 76.1 to 98.3% (0.001 < P-value < 0.005).
CONCLUSION: Previous papers have discussed various methods of improving operative note standards. We present statistical evidence for the use of an Operative Note Proforma to improve operative note standards within Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery.

Keywords:  Audit; Operation note; Operative note

Year:  2011        PMID: 22942588      PMCID: PMC3238552          DOI: 10.1007/s12663-011-0231-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg        ISSN: 0972-8270


  11 in total

1.  An audit of the quality of operation notes in an otolaryngology unit.

Authors:  N D Bateman; A S Carney; K P Gibbin
Journal:  J R Coll Surg Edinb       Date:  1999-04

2.  The use of an aide-memoire to improve the quality of operation notes in an orthopaedic unit.

Authors:  R Din; D Jena; B N Muddu; D Jennna
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 1.891

3.  A pilot study of electronic cardiovascular operative notes: qualitative assessment and challenges in implementation.

Authors:  Morgan L Brown; Luis G Quiñonez; Hartzell V Schaff
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2009-12-04       Impact factor: 6.113

4.  Interactive computer operative notes for arthroscopy of joints: a free and accurate tool for surgeons.

Authors:  Amit Atrey; Steven A Corbett; Paul A Gibb; Sam Singh; Hagen Jähnich
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 4.772

5.  Efficiency, comprehensiveness and cost-effectiveness when comparing dictation and electronic templates for operative reports.

Authors:  Mark R Laflamme; Paul R Dexter; Marilyn F Graham; Siu L Hui; Clement J McDonald
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2005

6.  The quality of operative notes at a general surgery unit.

Authors:  A Rogers; M Bunting; A Atherstone
Journal:  S Afr Med J       Date:  2008-09

7.  Computer generated operation notes.

Authors:  V A Currall; T J Chesser
Journal:  Stud Health Technol Inform       Date:  2008

8.  The quality of operation notes: can simple word processors help?

Authors:  A O'Bichere; D Sellu
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 1.891

9.  Comparison of information obtained by operative note abstraction with that recorded on a standardized data collection form.

Authors:  Roberta Scherer; Qi Zhu; Patricia Langenberg; Steven Feldon; Shalom Kelman; Kay Dickersin
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 3.982

10.  Improving operation notes to meet British Orthopaedic Association guidelines.

Authors:  David Morgan; Noel Fisher; Aman Ahmad; Fazle Alam
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2008-12-19       Impact factor: 1.891

View more
  6 in total

1.  Improving the Quality of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgical Notes in an Indian Public Sector Hospital in Accordance with the Royal College of Surgeons Guidelines: A Completed Audit Loop Study.

Authors:  B Krishnan; G Arun Prasad; B Madhan
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2015-10-28

2.  Capturing Surgical Data: Comparing a Quality Improvement Registry to Natural Language Processing and Manual Chart Review.

Authors:  Benjamin T Miller; Aldo Fafaj; Luciano Tastaldi; Hemasat Alkhatib; Samuel Zolin; Raha AlMarzooqi; Chao Tu; Diya Alaedeen; Ajita S Prabhu; David M Krpata; Michael J Rosen; Clayton C Petro
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2022-02-28       Impact factor: 3.267

3.  Audit of Orthopaedic Surgical Documentation.

Authors:  Fionn Coughlan; Prasad Ellanti; Cliodhna Ní Fhoghlu; Andrew Moriarity; Niall Hogan
Journal:  Surg Res Pract       Date:  2015-08-19

4.  Assessing the quality of operation notes: a review of 1092 operation notes in 9 UK hospitals.

Authors:  Julia Blackburn
Journal:  Patient Saf Surg       Date:  2016-02-06

5.  Improving the Standard of Orthopaedic Operation Documentation Using Typed Proforma Operation Notes: A Completed Audit Loop.

Authors:  Fionn Coughlan; Prasad Ellanti; Andrew Moriarty; Nuala McAuley; Niall Hogan
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2017-03-07

6.  The quality of hand-written operative notes in a surgical unit at Queen Elizabeth Central Hospital (QECH), Malawi: A prospective completed audit loop study.

Authors:  Nohakhelha Nyamulani; Wakisa Mulwafu
Journal:  Malawi Med J       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 0.875

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.