Literature DB >> 19113057

The quality of operative notes at a general surgery unit.

A Rogers1, M Bunting, A Atherstone.   

Abstract

AIM: With the increasingly litigious nature of medical practice, accurate documentation is critical. This is particularly true for operative procedures, and medical councils have identified this and published guidelines to aid surgeons. However, these remain a frequently cited weakness in their defence in medico-legal cases. This study assessed the accuracy of operative notes in a general surgery unit in order to improve our practice.
METHOD: An audit of 100 consecutive operative notes was performed, and notes were assessed using the Royal College of Surgeons guidelines. The quality of note-taking of trainees was compared with that of consultant surgeons. A series of operation note pro formas was designed in response to the findings.
RESULTS: Of the notes, 66% were completed by trainees. The vast majority of notes had no diagram to demonstrate the surgical findings or illustrate the actions. Specialist surgeons were more likely to describe the actions accurately, but less likely to describe wound closure methods or dressings used. They were also less likely to complete adequate postoperative orders.
CONCLUSIONS: This study identifies key areas of weakness in our operative note-keeping. Pro formas should be introduced and made available for commonly performed procedures, and diagrams should be used wherever possible.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19113057

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  S Afr Med J


  4 in total

1.  Improving the Quality of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgical Notes in an Indian Public Sector Hospital in Accordance with the Royal College of Surgeons Guidelines: A Completed Audit Loop Study.

Authors:  B Krishnan; G Arun Prasad; B Madhan
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2015-10-28

2.  Improving the Standard of Operative Notes within an Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Department, using an Operative Note Proforma.

Authors:  Karl Payne; Keith Jones; Andrew Dickenson
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2011-05-06

3.  Differences between attendings' and residents' operative notes for laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Linda S G L Wauben; Richard H M Goossens; Johan F Lange
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  The quality of hand-written operative notes in a surgical unit at Queen Elizabeth Central Hospital (QECH), Malawi: A prospective completed audit loop study.

Authors:  Nohakhelha Nyamulani; Wakisa Mulwafu
Journal:  Malawi Med J       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 0.875

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.