Literature DB >> 22941803

Glenoid bone loss in primary total shoulder arthroplasty: evaluation and management.

Benjamin W Sears1, Peter S Johnston, Matthew L Ramsey, Gerald R Williams.   

Abstract

Glenohumeral osteoarthritis is the most common reason for shoulder replacement. Total shoulder arthroplasty provides reliable pain relief and restoration of function, with implant survivorship reported at 85% at 15 years. Glenoid component wear and aseptic loosening are among the most common reasons for revision. Glenoid wear characteristics have been correlated with, among other things, the degree of anatomic glenoid version correction. Anatomic glenoid reconstruction is particularly challenging in the presence of glenoid bone deficiency. Walch classified glenoid morphology into five types: type A, centered, without posterior subluxation but with minor erosion (A1) or major erosion (A2); type B, posteriorly subluxated (B1) or posteriorly subluxated with posterior glenoid erosion (B2); and type C, excessive glenoid retroversion. The type A glenoid represents only 59% of patients; thus, the need to address glenoid deformity is common. Methods of correction include asymmetric reaming of the anterior glenoid, bone grafting of the posterior glenoid, and implanting a specialized glenoid component with posterior augmentation. In many cases of type C or hypoplastic glenoid, the humerus is concentrically reduced in the deficient glenoid and glenoid deformity may not need to be corrected. Severely hypoplastic glenoid may require the use of bone-sparing glenoid components or reverse total shoulder arthroplasty.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22941803     DOI: 10.5435/JAAOS-20-09-604

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Acad Orthop Surg        ISSN: 1067-151X            Impact factor:   3.020


  21 in total

1.  The arthritic glenoid: anatomy and arthroplasty designs.

Authors:  Nikolas K Knowles; Louis M Ferreira; George S Athwal
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2016-03

2.  Soft tissue balancing in total shoulder replacement.

Authors:  Maike Mueller; Gregory Hoy
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2014-03

3.  Axillary view: arthritic glenohumeral anatomy and changes after ream and run.

Authors:  Frederick A Matsen; Akash Gupta
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-10-18       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  "Shaped" humeral head autograft reverse shoulder arthroplasty : Treatment for primary glenohumeral osteoarthritis with significant posterior glenoid bone loss (B2, B3, and C type).

Authors:  S Harmsen; D Casagrande; T Norris
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 1.087

5.  Risk of Perforation Is High During Corrective Reaming of Retroverted Glenoids: A Computer Simulation Study.

Authors:  Alexander W Aleem; Nathan D Orvets; Brendan C Patterson; Aaron M Chamberlain; Jay D Keener
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Quantitative in vivo assessment of bone allograft viability using 18F-fluoride PET/CT after glenoid augmentation in reverse shoulder arthroplasty: a pilot study.

Authors:  Josef Hochreiter; Georg Mattiassich; Wolfgang Hitzl; Georg Weber; Mohsen Beheshti; Reinhold Ortmaier
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2019-06-06

7.  Rotator cuff fatty infiltration and atrophy are associated with functional outcomes in anatomic shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Peter L C Lapner; Liangfu Jiang; Tinghua Zhang; George S Athwal
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-09-30       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 8.  Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty: Biomechanics and Indications.

Authors:  Caitlin M Rugg; Monica J Coughlan; Drew A Lansdown
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2019-12

Review 9.  Glenoid bony morphology of osteoarthritis prior to shoulder arthroplasty: what the surgeon wants to know and why.

Authors:  Lawrence Lo; Scott Koenig; Natalie L Leong; Brian B Shiu; S Ashfaq Hasan; Mohit N Gilotra; Kenneth C Wang
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2020-10-23       Impact factor: 2.199

10.  Can the ream and run procedure improve glenohumeral relationships and function for shoulders with the arthritic triad?

Authors:  Frederick A Matsen; Winston J Warme; Sarah E Jackins
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-12-09       Impact factor: 4.176

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.