Literature DB >> 22940102

Progress in understanding preferential detection of live cells using viability dyes in combination with DNA amplification.

Mariana Fittipaldi1, Andreas Nocker, Francesc Codony.   

Abstract

The ideal scenario in most applications of microbial diagnostics is that only viable cells are detected. Bacteria were traditionally considered viable when they could be cultured, whereas today's viability concept tends to be alternatively based on the presence of some form of metabolic activity, a positive energy status, responsiveness, detection of RNA transcripts that tend to degrade rapidly after cell death, or of an intact membrane. The latter criterion, although conservative, was the focus of one of the most successful recent approaches to detect viable cells in combination with DNA amplification techniques. The technology is based on sample treatment with the photoactivatable, and cell membrane impermeant, nucleic acid intercalating dyes ethidium monoazide (EMA) or propidium monoazide (PMA) followed by light exposure prior to extraction of DNA and amplification. Light activation of DNA-bound dye molecules results in irreversible DNA modification and subsequent inhibition of its amplification. Sample pretreatment with viability dyes has so far been mainly used in combination with PCR (leading to the term viability PCR, v-PCR), and increasingly with isothermal amplification method. The principle is not limited to bacteria, but has also successfully been applied to fungi, protozoa and viruses. Despite the success of the method, some practical limitations have been identified, especially when applied to environmental samples. In part they can be minimized by choice of experimental parameters and conditions adequate for a particular sample. This review summarizes current knowledge and presents aspects which are important when designing experiments employing viability dyes.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22940102     DOI: 10.1016/j.mimet.2012.08.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Microbiol Methods        ISSN: 0167-7012            Impact factor:   2.363


  73 in total

1.  Viability Quantitative PCR Utilizing Propidium Monoazide, Spheroplast Formation, and Campylobacter coli as a Bacterial Model.

Authors:  Thomai P Lazou; Eleni G Iossifidou; Athanasios I Gelasakis; Serafeim C Chaintoutis; Chrysostomos I Dovas
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2019-10-01       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  False-Positive Viability PCR Results: An Association with Microtubes.

Authors:  Gemma Agustí; Mariana Fittipaldi; Francesc Codony
Journal:  Curr Microbiol       Date:  2017-02-07       Impact factor: 2.188

3.  Optimization of a Viability PCR Method for the Detection of Listeria monocytogenes in Food Samples.

Authors:  Gemma Agustí; Mariana Fittipaldi; Francesc Codony
Journal:  Curr Microbiol       Date:  2018-02-12       Impact factor: 2.188

4.  Detection of Streptococcus suis in bioaerosols of swine confinement buildings.

Authors:  Laetitia Bonifait; Marc Veillette; Valérie Létourneau; Daniel Grenier; Caroline Duchaine
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2014-03-14       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 5.  Dead or alive: molecular assessment of microbial viability.

Authors:  Gerard A Cangelosi; John S Meschke
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2014-07-18       Impact factor: 4.792

6.  Viable but Nonculturable Escherichia coli O157:H7 and Salmonella enterica in Fresh Produce: Rapid Determination by Loop-Mediated Isothermal Amplification Coupled with a Propidium Monoazide Treatment.

Authors:  Lu Han; Kaidi Wang; Lina Ma; Pascal Delaquis; Susan Bach; Jinsong Feng; Xiaonan Lu
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2020-03-18       Impact factor: 4.792

7.  Quantification of viable Giardia cysts and Cryptosporidium oocysts in wastewater using propidium monoazide quantitative real-time PCR.

Authors:  José L Alonso; Inmaculada Amorós; Rebecca A Guy
Journal:  Parasitol Res       Date:  2014-04-30       Impact factor: 2.289

8.  Comparative analysis and limitations of ethidium monoazide and propidium monoazide treatments for the differentiation of viable and nonviable campylobacter cells.

Authors:  Diana Seinige; Carsten Krischek; Günter Klein; Corinna Kehrenberg
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2014-01-31       Impact factor: 4.792

9.  Detection and Quantification of Viable and Nonviable Trypanosoma cruzi Parasites by a Propidium Monoazide Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction Assay.

Authors:  Beatriz Cancino-Faure; Roser Fisa; M Magdalena Alcover; Teresa Jimenez-Marco; Cristina Riera
Journal:  Am J Trop Med Hyg       Date:  2016-05-02       Impact factor: 2.345

10.  Viability RT-qPCR Combined with Sodium Deoxycholate Pre-treatment for Selective Quantification of Infectious Viruses in Drinking Water Samples.

Authors:  Vu Duc Canh; Ikuro Kasuga; Hiroaki Furumai; Hiroyuki Katayama
Journal:  Food Environ Virol       Date:  2019-01-24       Impact factor: 2.778

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.