OBJECTIVE: We have previously shown that surgical Technical Performance Scores (TPS) are important predictors of early postoperative morbidity across a wide spectrum of procedures and that intraoperative recognition and intervention of residual defects resulted in improved outcomes. We hypothesized that these scores would also be important predictors of midterm outcomes. METHODS: Neonates and infants aged younger 6 months were prospectively followed from the index surgery for a minimum of 1 year. The TPS were calculated using previously published criteria, including intraoperative course, predischarge echocardiograms or catheterizations, and clinical data, and graded as optimal, adequate, or inadequate. Case complexity was determined by the Risk Adjustment for Congenital Heart Surgery-1 category. The primary outcome was mortality, and the secondary outcome was the need for unplanned reinterventions. Outcomes were analyzed using nonparametric methods and a logistic regression model. RESULTS: A total of 166 patients were included in our study, with 7 early deaths. The remaining 159 patients (Risk Adjustment for Congenital Heart Surgery-1 category 4-6, 76 [48%]; neonates, 78 [49%]) were followed for a minimum of 1 year after surgery. There were 14 late deaths or late transplantations and 55 late reinterventions. On univariate analysis, the TPS were associated with mortality (P < .001) and reintervention (P = .04). On logistic regression analysis, inadequate TPS was associated with late mortality (P < .001; odds ratio, 7.2; 95% confidence interval, 2.2-23.6), and Risk Adjustment for Congenital Heart Surgery-1 category (P = .004; odds ratio, 3.7; 1.5-8.8) at index surgery was associated with need for late unplanned reintervention. CONCLUSIONS: Technical performance affects midterm survival after infant heart surgery. Inadequate TPS can be used to prospectively identify patients at ongoing risk of demise and the need for reintervention. An aggressive approach to diagnosing and treating residual lesions at the initial operation is warranted.
OBJECTIVE: We have previously shown that surgical Technical Performance Scores (TPS) are important predictors of early postoperative morbidity across a wide spectrum of procedures and that intraoperative recognition and intervention of residual defects resulted in improved outcomes. We hypothesized that these scores would also be important predictors of midterm outcomes. METHODS: Neonates and infants aged younger 6 months were prospectively followed from the index surgery for a minimum of 1 year. The TPS were calculated using previously published criteria, including intraoperative course, predischarge echocardiograms or catheterizations, and clinical data, and graded as optimal, adequate, or inadequate. Case complexity was determined by the Risk Adjustment for Congenital Heart Surgery-1 category. The primary outcome was mortality, and the secondary outcome was the need for unplanned reinterventions. Outcomes were analyzed using nonparametric methods and a logistic regression model. RESULTS: A total of 166 patients were included in our study, with 7 early deaths. The remaining 159 patients (Risk Adjustment for Congenital Heart Surgery-1 category 4-6, 76 [48%]; neonates, 78 [49%]) were followed for a minimum of 1 year after surgery. There were 14 late deaths or late transplantations and 55 late reinterventions. On univariate analysis, the TPS were associated with mortality (P < .001) and reintervention (P = .04). On logistic regression analysis, inadequate TPS was associated with late mortality (P < .001; odds ratio, 7.2; 95% confidence interval, 2.2-23.6), and Risk Adjustment for Congenital Heart Surgery-1 category (P = .004; odds ratio, 3.7; 1.5-8.8) at index surgery was associated with need for late unplanned reintervention. CONCLUSIONS: Technical performance affects midterm survival after infant heart surgery. Inadequate TPS can be used to prospectively identify patients at ongoing risk of demise and the need for reintervention. An aggressive approach to diagnosing and treating residual lesions at the initial operation is warranted.
Authors: Anitha Parthiban; Jami C Levine; Meena Nathan; Jennifer A Marshall; Girish S Shirali; Stephen D Simon; Steve D Colan; Jane W Newburger; Geetha Raghuveer Journal: Pediatr Cardiol Date: 2015-09-10 Impact factor: 1.655
Authors: Meena Nathan; Felicia L Trachtenberg; Maria I Van Rompay; William Gaynor; Kirk Kanter; Richard Ohye; Emile A Bacha; James Tweddell; Steven M Schwartz; L LuAnn Minich; Carlos M Mery; Steven D Colan; Jami Levine; Linda M Lambert; Jane W Newburger Journal: J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Date: 2019-11-15 Impact factor: 5.209
Authors: David W Brown; Katie E Cohen; Patricia O'Brien; Kimberlee Gauvreau; Thomas S Klitzner; Robert H Beekman; John D Kugler; Gerard R Martin; Steven R Neish; Geoffrey L Rosenthal; Carole Lannon; Kathy J Jenkins Journal: Pediatr Cardiol Date: 2014-08-19 Impact factor: 1.655
Authors: Meena Nathan; Lynn A Sleeper; Richard G Ohye; Peter C Frommelt; Christopher A Caldarone; James S Tweddell; Minmin Lu; Gail D Pearson; J William Gaynor; Christian Pizarro; Ismee A Williams; Steven D Colan; Carolyn Dunbar-Masterson; Peter J Gruber; Kevin Hill; Jennifer Hirsch-Romano; Jeffrey P Jacobs; Jonathan R Kaltman; S Ram Kumar; David Morales; Scott M Bradley; Kirk Kanter; Jane W Newburger Journal: J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Date: 2014-06-19 Impact factor: 5.209
Authors: Frank B Sachse; Jordan Johnson; Brian Cottle; Abhijit Mondal; Robert Hitchcock; Aditya K Kaza Journal: Heart Rhythm Date: 2020-07-10 Impact factor: 6.343
Authors: Meena Nathan; Jami C Levine; Maria I Van Rompay; Linda M Lambert; Felicia L Trachtenberg; Steven D Colan; Iki Adachi; Brett R Anderson; Emile A Bacha; Aaron Eckhauser; J William Gaynor; Eric M Graham; Benjamin Goot; Jeffrey P Jacobs; Rija John; Jonathan R Kaltman; Kirk R Kanter; Carlos M Mery; L LuAnn Minich; Richard Ohye; David Overman; Christian Pizarro; Geetha Raghuveer; Marcus S Schamberger; Steven M Schwartz; Shanthi L Narasimhan; Michael D Taylor; Ke Wang; Jane W Newburger Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2021-05-18 Impact factor: 24.094