Yogesh Moradiya1, Nazli Janjua. 1. Department of Neurology, SUNY Downstate Medical Center, Brooklyn, New York. Electronic address: Yogesh.Moradiya@downstate.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Recent studies comparing the outcomes of wake-up stroke (WUS) and stroke while awake (SWA) patients reveal better outcomes among SWA patients, attributable in part to their higher rates of thrombolysis. Patients with WUS are largely excluded from therapy. Earlier analyses, conducted before the approval of alteplase for acute stroke, show the true divergence of natural histories between these 2 groups. METHODS: We analyzed 17,398 patients with ischemic stroke from the International Stroke Trial and compared both presentations and outcomes between the WUS and SWA groups. Severity was assessed by level of consciousness, Oxfordshire Community Stroke Project (OCSP) stroke classification, number of neurologic deficits, and predicted probability of dependency or death. Outcomes were assessed at day 14 and at 6 months. Outcome assessments were controlled for potential confounders. RESULTS: WUS represented 29.6% of all ischemic strokes. More severe OSCP stroke type (total anterior circulation syndrome) was less common in WUS. Although more patients with WUS were alert at presentation with a lower predicted probability of dependency, the 14-day mortality rates and rates of poor outcome at 6 months were similar between the 2 groups. CONCLUSIONS: WUS patients comprise one quarter to one third of ischemic stroke patients. Despite their more benign presentations, they deteriorate to outcome rates similar to SWA. Although they are typically excluded from time-dependent acute interventions, patients with WUS may benefit from acute intervention to prevent this worsening natural history.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Recent studies comparing the outcomes of wake-up stroke (WUS) and stroke while awake (SWA) patients reveal better outcomes among SWA patients, attributable in part to their higher rates of thrombolysis. Patients with WUS are largely excluded from therapy. Earlier analyses, conducted before the approval of alteplase for acute stroke, show the true divergence of natural histories between these 2 groups. METHODS: We analyzed 17,398 patients with ischemic stroke from the International Stroke Trial and compared both presentations and outcomes between the WUS and SWA groups. Severity was assessed by level of consciousness, Oxfordshire Community Stroke Project (OCSP) stroke classification, number of neurologic deficits, and predicted probability of dependency or death. Outcomes were assessed at day 14 and at 6 months. Outcome assessments were controlled for potential confounders. RESULTS: WUS represented 29.6% of all ischemic strokes. More severe OSCP stroke type (total anterior circulation syndrome) was less common in WUS. Although more patients with WUS were alert at presentation with a lower predicted probability of dependency, the 14-day mortality rates and rates of poor outcome at 6 months were similar between the 2 groups. CONCLUSIONS: WUS patients comprise one quarter to one third of ischemic strokepatients. Despite their more benign presentations, they deteriorate to outcome rates similar to SWA. Although they are typically excluded from time-dependent acute interventions, patients with WUS may benefit from acute intervention to prevent this worsening natural history.
Authors: King Chung Ho; William Speier; Haoyue Zhang; Fabien Scalzo; Suzie El-Saden; Corey W Arnold Journal: IEEE Trans Med Imaging Date: 2019-02-25 Impact factor: 10.048