BACKGROUND: The cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) response in heart failure with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (HFPEF) is incompletely understood. We aimed to describe the CPET response in HFPEF and to assess its invasive hemodynamic determinants. METHODS AND RESULTS: Ten patients with HFPEF and 8 asymptomatic controls underwent resting and exercise right heart catheterization and maximal symptom-limited CPET. The slope of the minute ventilation/carbon dioxide production relationship (VE/VCO(2) slope; 34.3 ± 5.4 vs. 28.4 ± 3.4; P = .02) was steeper, peak oxygen consumption (peak VO(2); 15.1 ± 4.9 vs. 26.6 ± 12.5 mL∗kg(-1)∗min(-1); P = .02) was lower, and heart rate recovery 1 minute after exercise termination (HRR-1; 10 ± 5 vs. 27 ± 10 beats/min; P < .001) was slower in HFPEF compared to controls. A steeper VE/VCO(2) slope (r = 0.67, P = .002), lower peak VO(2) (r = -0.48, P = .04), and slower HRR-1 (r = -0.58, P = .02) were significantly related to a higher ratio of the change in pulmonary capillary wedge pressure per change in work rate as a measure of the left ventricular pressure volume relationship. CONCLUSIONS: In HFPEF patients, fundamental alterations in the CPET profile occur and these may, in part, result from the rapid rise in left ventricular filling pressures which accompanies exercise in these patients.
BACKGROUND: The cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) response in heart failure with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (HFPEF) is incompletely understood. We aimed to describe the CPET response in HFPEF and to assess its invasive hemodynamic determinants. METHODS AND RESULTS: Ten patients with HFPEF and 8 asymptomatic controls underwent resting and exercise right heart catheterization and maximal symptom-limited CPET. The slope of the minute ventilation/carbon dioxide production relationship (VE/VCO(2) slope; 34.3 ± 5.4 vs. 28.4 ± 3.4; P = .02) was steeper, peak oxygen consumption (peak VO(2); 15.1 ± 4.9 vs. 26.6 ± 12.5 mL∗kg(-1)∗min(-1); P = .02) was lower, and heart rate recovery 1 minute after exercise termination (HRR-1; 10 ± 5 vs. 27 ± 10 beats/min; P < .001) was slower in HFPEF compared to controls. A steeper VE/VCO(2) slope (r = 0.67, P = .002), lower peak VO(2) (r = -0.48, P = .04), and slower HRR-1 (r = -0.58, P = .02) were significantly related to a higher ratio of the change in pulmonary capillary wedge pressure per change in work rate as a measure of the left ventricular pressure volume relationship. CONCLUSIONS: In HFPEF patients, fundamental alterations in the CPET profile occur and these may, in part, result from the rapid rise in left ventricular filling pressures which accompanies exercise in these patients.
Authors: Marzena Zurek; Micha T Maeder; Martin H Brutsche; Adrian Lüthi; Raphael Twerenbold; Michael Freese; Hans Rickli; Christian Mueller Journal: Eur J Appl Physiol Date: 2014-01-05 Impact factor: 3.078
Authors: Dalane W Kitzman; David M Herrington; Peter H Brubaker; J Brian Moore; Joel Eggebeen; Mark J Haykowsky Journal: Hypertension Date: 2012-11-12 Impact factor: 10.190
Authors: Rosita Zakeri; Barry A Borlaug; Steven E McNulty; Selma F Mohammed; Gregory D Lewis; Marc J Semigran; Anita Deswal; Martin LeWinter; Adrian F Hernandez; Eugene Braunwald; Margaret M Redfield Journal: Circ Heart Fail Date: 2013-10-25 Impact factor: 8.790