BACKGROUND: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is common among patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), but its clinical profile and impact on exercise capacity remain unclear. RELAX (Phosphodiesterase-5 Inhibition to Improve Clinical Status and Exercise Capacity in HFpEF) was a multicenter randomized trial testing the impact of sildenafil on peak VO2 in stable outpatients with chronic HFpEF. We sought to compare clinical features and exercise capacity among patients with HFpEF who were in sinus rhythm (SR) or AF. METHODS AND RESULTS:RELAX enrolled 216 patients with HFpEF, of whom 79 (37%) were in AF, 124 (57%) in SR, and 13 in other rhythms. Participants underwent baseline cardiopulmonary exercise testing, echocardiogram, biomarker assessment, and rhythm status assessment before randomization. Patients with AF were older than those in SR but had similar symptom severity, comorbidities, and renal function. β-blocker use and chronotropic indices were also similar. Despite comparable left ventricular size and mass, AF was associated with worse systolic (lower EF, stroke volume, and cardiac index) and diastolic (shorter deceleration time and larger left atria) function compared with SR. Pulmonary artery systolic pressure was higher in AF. Patients with AF had higher N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide, aldosterone, endothelin-1, troponin I, and C-telopeptide for type I collagen levels, suggesting more severe neurohumoral activation, myocyte necrosis, and fibrosis. Peak VO2 was lower in AF, even after adjustment for age, sex, and chronotropic response, and VE/VCO2 was higher. CONCLUSIONS: AF identifies an HFpEF cohort with more advanced disease and significantly reduced exercise capacity. These data suggest that evaluation of the impact of different rate or rhythm control strategies on exercise tolerance in patients with HFpEF and AF is warranted. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00763867.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND:Atrial fibrillation (AF) is common among patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), but its clinical profile and impact on exercise capacity remain unclear. RELAX (Phosphodiesterase-5 Inhibition to Improve Clinical Status and Exercise Capacity in HFpEF) was a multicenter randomized trial testing the impact of sildenafil on peak VO2 in stable outpatients with chronic HFpEF. We sought to compare clinical features and exercise capacity among patients with HFpEF who were in sinus rhythm (SR) or AF. METHODS AND RESULTS: RELAX enrolled 216 patients with HFpEF, of whom 79 (37%) were in AF, 124 (57%) in SR, and 13 in other rhythms. Participants underwent baseline cardiopulmonary exercise testing, echocardiogram, biomarker assessment, and rhythm status assessment before randomization. Patients with AF were older than those in SR but had similar symptom severity, comorbidities, and renal function. β-blocker use and chronotropic indices were also similar. Despite comparable left ventricular size and mass, AF was associated with worse systolic (lower EF, stroke volume, and cardiac index) and diastolic (shorter deceleration time and larger left atria) function compared with SR. Pulmonary artery systolic pressure was higher in AF. Patients with AF had higher N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide, aldosterone, endothelin-1, troponin I, and C-telopeptide for type I collagen levels, suggesting more severe neurohumoral activation, myocyte necrosis, and fibrosis. Peak VO2 was lower in AF, even after adjustment for age, sex, and chronotropic response, and VE/VCO2 was higher. CONCLUSIONS:AF identifies an HFpEF cohort with more advanced disease and significantly reduced exercise capacity. These data suggest that evaluation of the impact of different rate or rhythm control strategies on exercise tolerance in patients with HFpEF and AF is warranted. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00763867.
Authors: Ross Arena; Jonathan Myers; Joshua Abella; Mary Ann Peberdy; Daniel Bensimhon; Paul Chase; Marco Guazzi Journal: Circulation Date: 2007-04-23 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Margaret M Redfield; Horng H Chen; Barry A Borlaug; Marc J Semigran; Kerry L Lee; Gregory Lewis; Martin M LeWinter; Jean L Rouleau; David A Bull; Douglas L Mann; Anita Deswal; Lynne W Stevenson; Michael M Givertz; Elizabeth O Ofili; Christopher M O'Connor; G Michael Felker; Steven R Goldsmith; Bradley A Bart; Steven E McNulty; Jenny C Ibarra; Grace Lin; Jae K Oh; Manesh R Patel; Raymond J Kim; Russell P Tracy; Eric J Velazquez; Kevin J Anstrom; Adrian F Hernandez; Alice M Mascette; Eugene Braunwald Journal: JAMA Date: 2013-03-27 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Thomas J Wang; Martin G Larson; Daniel Levy; Ramachandran S Vasan; Eric P Leip; Philip A Wolf; Ralph B D'Agostino; Joanne M Murabito; William B Kannel; Emelia J Benjamin Journal: Circulation Date: 2003-05-27 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: M Alings; M D Smit; M L Moes; H J G M Crijns; J G P Tijssen; J Brügemann; H L Hillege; D A Lane; G Y H Lip; J R L M Smeets; R G Tieleman; R Tukkie; F F Willems; R A Vermond; D J Van Veldhuisen; I C Van Gelder Journal: Neth Heart J Date: 2013-07 Impact factor: 2.380
Authors: Ravi B Patel; Fawaz Alenezi; Jie-Lena Sun; Brooke Alhanti; Muthiah Vaduganathan; Jae K Oh; Margaret M Redfield; Javed Butler; Adrian F Hernandez; Eric J Velazquez; Sanjiv J Shah Journal: J Card Fail Date: 2019-12-17 Impact factor: 5.712
Authors: Maria Valero-Munoz; Shanpeng Li; Richard M Wilson; Batbold Boldbaatar; Marc Iglarz; Flora Sam Journal: Circ Heart Fail Date: 2016-11 Impact factor: 8.790
Authors: Camilo Toledo; David C Andrade; Claudia Lucero; Alexis Arce-Alvarez; Hugo S Díaz; Valentín Aliaga; Harold D Schultz; Noah J Marcus; Mónica Manríquez; Marcelo Faúndez; Rodrigo Del Rio Journal: J Physiol Date: 2017-03-19 Impact factor: 5.182