Literature DB >> 22938908

Can simulation improve the traditional method of root cause analysis: a preliminary investigation.

Eric R Simms1, Douglas P Slakey, Meghan E Garstka, Steven A Tersigni, James R Korndorffer.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations recommendations for conducting root cause analysis (RCA) include identifying "root causes" and "common-cause variation" rather than "proximate causes" and "special-cause variation" to create interventions. Simulation for health care RCA is a novel technique but has not been compared with traditional RCA methods.
METHODS: All of the RCAs of adverse events conducted at Tulane Hospital between September 2010 and September 2011 were reviewed. A case of missed postprocedural, preoperative hemorrhage resulting in death was chosen. Hospital records were analyzed to identify the presumed root causes. A simulation of the event was developed and conducted. Six test subjects (preoperative and postanesthesia care unit nurses) participated in the simulation. Root causes identified by simulation analysis were compared with those identified by traditional RCA.
RESULTS: In 2 of 6 simulations, the adverse event was duplicated. The root cause identified by standard RCA technique was inattention to signs of bleeding in the patient/ lack of appropriate monitoring of the patient by nursing staff ("special-cause variation"). Simulation-based RCA revealed that the root cause was not only inadequate monitoring, but also the lack of physical presence of physicians in the care environment ("common-cause variation"). Simulation-based RCA identified root causes more amenable to intervention. DISCUSSION: This study demonstrates that simulation-based RCA can identify additional root causes amenable to making health care interventions when compared with traditional RCA.
Copyright © 2012 Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22938908     DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2012.07.029

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surgery        ISSN: 0039-6060            Impact factor:   3.982


  6 in total

1.  Effectiveness of systems changes suggested by simulation of adverse surgical outcomes.

Authors:  Meghan E Garstka; Douglas P Slakey; Christopher A Martin; Eric R Simms; James R Korndorffer
Journal:  BMJ Simul Technol Enhanc Learn       Date:  2015-12-01

2.  Creating Patient Safety Team Members Through a Simulation-Based Interprofessional Root Cause Analysis Course.

Authors:  Sarah E Schall; Timothy L Switaj; Ashley T Parham; James K Aden; Renée I Matos
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2022-06-13

Review 3.  GENESISS 1-Generating Standards for In-Situ Simulation project: a scoping review and conceptual model.

Authors:  Bryn Baxendale; Kerry Evans; Alison Cowley; Louise Bramley; Guilia Miles; Alastair Ross; Eleanore Dring; Joanne Cooper
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2022-06-20       Impact factor: 3.263

4.  GENESISS 2-Generating Standards for In-Situ Simulation project: a systematic mapping review.

Authors:  Kerry Evans; Jenny Woodruff; Alison Cowley; Louise Bramley; Giulia Miles; Alastair Ross; Joanne Cooper; Bryn Baxendale
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2022-07-11       Impact factor: 3.263

5.  The Past, Present, and Future of Simulation-based Education for Pediatric Emergency Medicine.

Authors:  Vincent J Grant; Meg Wolff; Mark Adler
Journal:  Clin Pediatr Emerg Med       Date:  2016-05-26

6.  Improving Safety Recommendations Before Implementation: A Simulation-Based Event Analysis to Optimize Interventions Designed to Prevent Recurrence of Adverse Events.

Authors:  Mélissa Langevin; Natalie Ward; Colleen Fitzgibbons; Christa Ramsay; Melanie Hogue; Anna-Theresa Lobos
Journal:  Simul Healthc       Date:  2022-02-01       Impact factor: 1.929

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.