PURPOSE: To investigate whether hypoxia targeted bifunctional suicide gene expression-cytosine deaminase (CD) and uracil phosphoribosyltransferase (UPRT) with 5-FC treatments can enhance radiotherapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Stable transfectants of R3327-AT cells were established which express a triple-fusion-gene: CD, UPRT and monomoric DsRed (mDsRed) controlled by a hypoxia inducible promoter. Hypoxia-induced expression/function of CDUPRTmDsRed was verified by western blot, flow cytometry, fluorescent microscopy, and cytotoxicity assay of 5-FU and 5-FC. Tumor-bearing mice were treated with 5-FC and local radiation. Tumor volume was monitored and compared with those treated with 5-FC or radiation alone. In addition, the CDUPRTmDsRed distribution in hypoxic regions of tumor sections was visualized with fluorescent microscopy. RESULTS: Hypoxic induction of CDUPRTmDsRed protein correlated with increased sensitivity to 5-FC and 5-FU. Significant radiosensitization effects were detected after 5-FC treatments under hypoxic conditions. In the tumor xenografts, the distribution of CDUPRTmDsRed expression visualized with fluorescence microscopy was co-localized with the hypoxia marker pimonidazole positive staining cells. Furthermore, administration of 5-FC to mice in combination with local irradiation resulted in significant tumor regression, as in comparison with 5-FC or radiation treatments alone. CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that the hypoxia-inducible CDUPRT/5-FC gene therapy strategy has the ability to specifically target hypoxic cancer cells and significantly improve the tumor control in combination with radiotherapy.
PURPOSE: To investigate whether hypoxia targeted bifunctional suicide gene expression-cytosine deaminase (CD) and uracil phosphoribosyltransferase (UPRT) with 5-FC treatments can enhance radiotherapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Stable transfectants of R3327-AT cells were established which express a triple-fusion-gene: CD, UPRT and monomoric DsRed (mDsRed) controlled by a hypoxia inducible promoter. Hypoxia-induced expression/function of CDUPRTmDsRed was verified by western blot, flow cytometry, fluorescent microscopy, and cytotoxicity assay of 5-FU and 5-FC. Tumor-bearing mice were treated with 5-FC and local radiation. Tumor volume was monitored and compared with those treated with 5-FC or radiation alone. In addition, the CDUPRTmDsRed distribution in hypoxic regions of tumor sections was visualized with fluorescent microscopy. RESULTS: Hypoxic induction of CDUPRTmDsRed protein correlated with increased sensitivity to 5-FC and 5-FU. Significant radiosensitization effects were detected after 5-FC treatments under hypoxic conditions. In the tumor xenografts, the distribution of CDUPRTmDsRed expression visualized with fluorescence microscopy was co-localized with the hypoxia marker pimonidazole positive staining cells. Furthermore, administration of 5-FC to mice in combination with local irradiation resulted in significant tumor regression, as in comparison with 5-FC or radiation treatments alone. CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that the hypoxia-inducible CDUPRT/5-FC gene therapy strategy has the ability to specifically target hypoxic cancer cells and significantly improve the tumor control in combination with radiotherapy.
Authors: James L Tatum; Gary J Kelloff; Robert J Gillies; Jeffrey M Arbeit; J Martin Brown; K S Clifford Chao; J Donald Chapman; William C Eckelman; Anthony W Fyles; Amato J Giaccia; Richard P Hill; Cameron J Koch; Murali Cherukuri Krishna; Kenneth A Krohn; Jason S Lewis; Ralph P Mason; Giovanni Melillo; Anwar R Padhani; Garth Powis; Joseph G Rajendran; Richard Reba; Simon P Robinson; Gregg L Semenza; Harold M Swartz; Peter Vaupel; David Yang; Barbara Croft; John Hoffman; Guoying Liu; Helen Stone; Daniel Sullivan Journal: Int J Radiat Biol Date: 2006-10 Impact factor: 2.694
Authors: Michael I Koukourakis; Søren M Bentzen; Alexandra Giatromanolaki; George D Wilson; Frances M Daley; Michele I Saunders; Stanley Dische; Efthimios Sivridis; Adrian L Harris Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2006-01-17 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Terence P F Gade; Jason A Koutcher; William M Spees; Bradley J Beattie; Vladimir Ponomarev; Michael Doubrovin; Ian M Buchanan; Tatiana Beresten; Kristen L Zakian; H Carl Le; William P Tong; Philipp Mayer-Kuckuk; Ronald G Blasberg; Juri G Gelovani Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2008-04-15 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Dongfang Wang; Hangjun Ruan; Lily Hu; Kathleen R Lamborn; Eileen L Kong; Alnawaz Rehemtulla; Dennis F Deen Journal: Cancer Gene Ther Date: 2005-03 Impact factor: 5.987
Authors: Marianne Nordsmark; Søren M Bentzen; Volker Rudat; David Brizel; Eric Lartigau; Peter Stadler; Axel Becker; Markus Adam; Michael Molls; Juergen Dunst; David J Terris; Jens Overgaard Journal: Radiother Oncol Date: 2005-08-10 Impact factor: 6.280
Authors: Jennifer K Chen; Lily J Hu; Dongfang Wang; Kathleen R Lamborn; Dennis F Deen Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2007-04-01 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Chris G Twitty; Oscar R Diago; Daniel J Hogan; Cindy Burrascano; Carlos E Ibanez; Douglas J Jolly; Derek Ostertag Journal: Hum Gene Ther Methods Date: 2015-12-01 Impact factor: 2.396
Authors: Jayoung Kim; Sujan K Mondal; Stephany Y Tzeng; Yuan Rui; Rawan Al-Kharboosh; Kristen K Kozielski; Adip G Bhargav; Cesar A Garcia; Alfredo Quiñones-Hinojosa; Jordan J Green Journal: ACS Biomater Sci Eng Date: 2020-04-17
Authors: Alexander I Kostyuk; Aleksandra D Kokova; Oleg V Podgorny; Ilya V Kelmanson; Elena S Fetisova; Vsevolod V Belousov; Dmitry S Bilan Journal: Antioxidants (Basel) Date: 2020-06-11