CONTEXT: Assessment of physical activity using self-report has the potential for measurement error that can lead to incorrect inferences about physical activity behaviors and bias study results. OBJECTIVE: To provide recommendations to improve the accuracy of physical activity derived from self report. PROCESS: We provide an overview of presentations and a compilation of perspectives shared by the authors of this paper and workgroup members. FINDINGS: We identified a conceptual framework for reducing errors using physical activity self-report questionnaires. The framework identifies 6 steps to reduce error: 1) identifying the need to measure physical activity, 2) selecting an instrument, 3) collecting data, 4) analyzing data, 5) developing a summary score, and 6) interpreting data. Underlying the first 4 steps are behavioral parameters of type, intensity, frequency, and duration of physical activities performed, activity domains, and the location where activities are performed. We identified ways to reduce measurement error at each step and made recommendations for practitioners, researchers, and organizational units to reduce error in questionnaire assessment of physical activity. CONCLUSIONS: Self-report measures of physical activity have a prominent role in research and practice settings. Measurement error may be reduced by applying the framework discussed in this paper.
CONTEXT: Assessment of physical activity using self-report has the potential for measurement error that can lead to incorrect inferences about physical activity behaviors and bias study results. OBJECTIVE: To provide recommendations to improve the accuracy of physical activity derived from self report. PROCESS: We provide an overview of presentations and a compilation of perspectives shared by the authors of this paper and workgroup members. FINDINGS: We identified a conceptual framework for reducing errors using physical activity self-report questionnaires. The framework identifies 6 steps to reduce error: 1) identifying the need to measure physical activity, 2) selecting an instrument, 3) collecting data, 4) analyzing data, 5) developing a summary score, and 6) interpreting data. Underlying the first 4 steps are behavioral parameters of type, intensity, frequency, and duration of physical activities performed, activity domains, and the location where activities are performed. We identified ways to reduce measurement error at each step and made recommendations for practitioners, researchers, and organizational units to reduce error in questionnaire assessment of physical activity. CONCLUSIONS: Self-report measures of physical activity have a prominent role in research and practice settings. Measurement error may be reduced by applying the framework discussed in this paper.
Authors: B E Ainsworth; W L Haskell; M C Whitt; M L Irwin; A M Swartz; S J Strath; W L O'Brien; D R Bassett; K H Schmitz; P O Emplaincourt; D R Jacobs; A S Leon Journal: Med Sci Sports Exerc Date: 2000-09 Impact factor: 5.411
Authors: Barbara E Ainsworth; William L Haskell; Stephen D Herrmann; Nathanael Meckes; David R Bassett; Catrine Tudor-Locke; Jennifer L Greer; Jesse Vezina; Melicia C Whitt-Glover; Arthur S Leon Journal: Med Sci Sports Exerc Date: 2011-08 Impact factor: 5.411
Authors: Ruth E Taylor-Piliae; Joan M Fair; William L Haskell; Ann N Varady; Carlos Iribarren; Mark A Hlatky; Alan S Go; Stephen P Fortmann Journal: J Phys Act Health Date: 2010-01
Authors: Ruth E Taylor-Piliae; Linda C Norton; William L Haskell; Mohammed H Mahbouda; Joan M Fair; Carlos Iribarren; Mark A Hlatky; Alan S Go; Stephen P Fortmann Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2006-07-13 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: Caroline A Macera; Sandra A Ham; Michelle M Yore; Deborah A Jones; Barbara E Ainsworth; C Dexter Kimsey; Harold W Kohl Journal: Prev Chronic Dis Date: 2005-03-15 Impact factor: 2.830
Authors: Gunhild M Gjerset; Jon H Loge; Sævar B Gudbergsson; Asta Bye; S D Fosså; Line M Oldervoll; Cecilie E Kiserud; Wendy Demark-Wahnefried; Lene Thorsen Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2015-09-14 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Katharina Wick; Oliver Faude; Susanne Schwager; Lukas Zahner; Lars Donath Journal: Int Arch Occup Environ Health Date: 2015-10-28 Impact factor: 3.015
Authors: Barbara E Ainsworth; Colleen Keller; Stephen Herrmann; Michael Belyea; Kathryn Records; Allison Nagle-Williams; Sonia Vega-López; Paska Permana; Dean V Coonrod Journal: Med Sci Sports Exerc Date: 2013-07 Impact factor: 5.411
Authors: Gregory J Welk; Youngwon Kim; Bryan Stanfill; David A Osthus; Miguel A Calabro; Sarah M Nusser; Alicia Carriquiry Journal: Med Sci Sports Exerc Date: 2014-10 Impact factor: 5.411
Authors: Donna Spruijt-Metz; Cheng K Fred Wen; Brooke M Bell; Stephen Intille; Jeannie S Huang; Tom Baranowski Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2018-08-19 Impact factor: 5.043
Authors: R J Mays; F L Goss; E F Nagle; M Gallagher; L Haile; M A Schafer; K H Kim; R J Robertson Journal: Int J Sports Med Date: 2016-07-13 Impact factor: 3.118
Authors: Natalie Anderton; Megan E Newhouse; Barbara E Ainsworth; Ingrid E Nygaard; Marlene J Egger; Janet M Shaw Journal: J Phys Act Health Date: 2014-05-06