Literature DB >> 22938374

Ultrasonic measurement of scleral cross-sectional strains during elevations of intraocular pressure: method validation and initial results in posterior porcine sclera.

Junhua Tang1, Jun Liu.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Scleral biomechanical properties may be important in the pathogenesis and progression of glaucoma. The goal of this study is to develop and validate an ultrasound method for measuring cross-sectional distributive strains in the sclera during elevations of intraocular pressure (IOP). METHOD OF APPROACH: Porcine globes (n = 5) were tested within 24 hs postmortem. The posterior scleral shells were dissected and mounted onto a custom-built pressurization chamber. A high-frequency (55-MHz) ultrasound system (Vevo660, VisualSonics Inc., Toronto) was employed to acquire the radio frequency data during scans of the posterior pole along both circumferential and meridian directions. The IOP was gradually increased from 5 to 45 mmHg. The displacement fields were obtained from correlation-based ultrasound speckle tracking. A least-square strain estimator was used to calculate the strains in both axial and lateral directions. Experimental validation was performed by comparing tissue displacements calculated from ultrasound speckle tracking with those induced by an actuator. Theoretical analysis and simulation experiments were performed to optimize the ultrasound speckle tracking method and evaluate the accuracy and signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) in strain estimation.
RESULTS: Porcine sclera exhibited significantly larger axial strains (e.g., -5.1 ± 1.5% at 45 mmHg, meridian direction) than lateral strains (e.g., 2.2 ± 0.7% at 45 mmHg, meridian direction) during IOP elevations (P's < 0.01). The strain magnitudes increased nonlinearly with pressure increase. The strain maps displayed heterogeneity through the thickness. The lateral strains were significantly smaller in the circumferential direction than the meridian direction at 45 mmHg (P < 0.05). Experimental validation showed that the ultrasound speckle tracking method was capable of tracking displacements at the accuracy of sub-micron to micron. Theoretical analysis predicted the dependence of the strain estimation SNR on the strain level, as well as signal processing parameters such as kernel size. Simulation results showed that ultrasound speckle tracking had a high accuracy for estimating strains of 1-5% and a high SNR for strains of 0.5-5%.
CONCLUSIONS: A new experimental method based on ultrasound speckle tracking has been developed for obtaining cross-sectional strain maps of the posterior sclera. This method provides a useful tool to examine distributive strains through the thickness of the sclera during elevations of IOP.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22938374      PMCID: PMC5413139          DOI: 10.1115/1.4007365

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech Eng        ISSN: 0148-0731            Impact factor:   2.097


  50 in total

1.  Modeling individual-specific human optic nerve head biomechanics. Part II: influence of material properties.

Authors:  Ian A Sigal; John G Flanagan; Inka Tertinegg; C Ross Ethier
Journal:  Biomech Model Mechanobiol       Date:  2008-02-27

2.  Calculation of pressure fields from arbitrarily shaped, apodized, and excited ultrasound transducers.

Authors:  J A Jensen; N B Svendsen
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 2.725

3.  Intervening attenuation affects first-order statistical properties of ultrasound echo signals.

Authors:  J A Zagzebski; J F Chen; F Dong; T Wilson
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 2.725

4.  Elastographic imaging of low-contrast elastic modulus distributions in tissue.

Authors:  F Kallel; J Ophir; K Magee; T Krouskop
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 2.998

5.  Ultrasonic measurement of differential displacement and strain in a vascular model.

Authors:  L K Ryan; F S Foster
Journal:  Ultrason Imaging       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 1.578

6.  The in vitro inflation response of mouse sclera.

Authors:  Kristin M Myers; Frances E Cone; Harry A Quigley; Scott Gelman; Mary E Pease; Thao D Nguyen
Journal:  Exp Eye Res       Date:  2010-09-22       Impact factor: 3.467

7.  Regulation of the mechanical properties of tree shrew sclera by the visual environment.

Authors:  J T Siegwart; T T Norton
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 1.886

8.  The relationship between glaucoma and myopia: the Blue Mountains Eye Study.

Authors:  P Mitchell; F Hourihan; J Sandbach; J J Wang
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 12.079

Review 9.  Scleral structure, organisation and disease. A review.

Authors:  Peter G Watson; Robert D Young
Journal:  Exp Eye Res       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 3.467

10.  Novel speckle-tracking radial strain from routine black-and-white echocardiographic images to quantify dyssynchrony and predict response to cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Authors:  Matthew S Suffoletto; Kaoru Dohi; Maxime Cannesson; Samir Saba; John Gorcsan
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2006-02-13       Impact factor: 29.690

View more
  34 in total

1.  Correlation between biomechanical responses of posterior sclera and IOP elevations during micro intraocular volume change.

Authors:  Hugh J Morris; Junhua Tang; Benjamin Cruz Perez; Xueliang Pan; Richard T Hart; Paul A Weber; Jun Liu
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2013-11-01       Impact factor: 4.799

2.  Imaging Corneal Biomechanical Responses to Ocular Pulse Using High-Frequency Ultrasound.

Authors:  Elias Pavlatos; Hong Chen; Keyton Clayson; Xueliang Pan; Jun Liu
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 10.048

3.  Spatially heterogeneous corneal mechanical responses before and after riboflavin-ultraviolet-A crosslinking.

Authors:  Joel R Palko; Junhua Tang; Benjamin Cruz Perez; Xueliang Pan; Jun Liu
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2014-04-18       Impact factor: 3.351

4.  Racioethnic Differences in Human Posterior Scleral and Optic Nerve Stump Deformation.

Authors:  Ehab A Tamimi; Jeffrey D Pyne; Dominic K Muli; Katelyn F Axman; Stephen J Howerton; Matthew R Davis; Christopher A Girkin; Jonathan P Vande Geest
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2017-08-01       Impact factor: 4.799

5.  Corneal Hydration Control during Ex Vivo Experimentation Using Poloxamers.

Authors:  Keyton Clayson; Thomas Sandwisch; Yanhui Ma; Elias Pavlatos; Xueliang Pan; Jun Liu
Journal:  Curr Eye Res       Date:  2019-09-18       Impact factor: 2.424

6.  Human scleral structural stiffness increases more rapidly with age in donors of African descent compared to donors of European descent.

Authors:  Massimo A Fazio; Rafael Grytz; Jeffrey S Morris; Luigi Bruno; Christopher A Girkin; J Crawford Downs
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2014-09-18       Impact factor: 4.799

7.  Age- and race-related differences in human scleral material properties.

Authors:  Rafael Grytz; Massimo A Fazio; Vincent Libertiaux; Luigi Bruno; Stuart Gardiner; Christopher A Girkin; J Crawford Downs
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2014-11-11       Impact factor: 4.799

8.  Changing material properties of the tree shrew sclera during minus lens compensation and recovery.

Authors:  Rafael Grytz; John T Siegwart
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2015-03-03       Impact factor: 4.799

9.  Biaxial mechanical testing of posterior sclera using high-resolution ultrasound speckle tracking for strain measurements.

Authors:  Benjamin Cruz Perez; Junhua Tang; Hugh J Morris; Joel R Palko; Xueliang Pan; Richard T Hart; Jun Liu
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2013-12-24       Impact factor: 2.712

10.  Age-related changes in human peripapillary scleral strain.

Authors:  Massimo A Fazio; Rafael Grytz; Jeffrey S Morris; Luigi Bruno; Stuart K Gardiner; Christopher A Girkin; J Crawford Downs
Journal:  Biomech Model Mechanobiol       Date:  2013-07-30
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.