Literature DB >> 22937805

Predicting the geographic distribution of a species from presence-only data subject to detection errors.

Robert M Dorazio1.   

Abstract

Several models have been developed to predict the geographic distribution of a species by combining measurements of covariates of occurrence at locations where the species is known to be present with measurements of the same covariates at other locations where species occurrence status (presence or absence) is unknown. In the absence of species detection errors, spatial point-process models and binary-regression models for case-augmented surveys provide consistent estimators of a species' geographic distribution without prior knowledge of species prevalence. In addition, these regression models can be modified to produce estimators of species abundance that are asymptotically equivalent to those of the spatial point-process models. However, if species presence locations are subject to detection errors, neither class of models provides a consistent estimator of covariate effects unless the covariates of species abundance are distinct and independently distributed from the covariates of species detection probability. These analytical results are illustrated using simulation studies of data sets that contain a wide range of presence-only sample sizes. Analyses of presence-only data of three avian species observed in a survey of landbirds in western Montana and northern Idaho are compared with site-occupancy analyses of detections and nondetections of these species.
© 2012, The International Biometric Society No claim to original US government works.

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22937805     DOI: 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2012.01779.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biometrics        ISSN: 0006-341X            Impact factor:   2.571


  9 in total

1.  Bias correction in species distribution models: pooling survey and collection data for multiple species.

Authors:  William Fithian; Jane Elith; Trevor Hastie; David A Keith
Journal:  Methods Ecol Evol       Date:  2014-10-10       Impact factor: 7.781

2.  Finite-Sample Equivalence in Statistical Models for Presence-Only Data.

Authors:  William Fithian; Trevor Hastie
Journal:  Ann Appl Stat       Date:  2013-12-01       Impact factor: 2.083

3.  Nondetection sampling bias in marked presence-only data.

Authors:  Trevor J Hefley; Andrew J Tyre; David M Baasch; Erin E Blankenship
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2013-12-02       Impact factor: 2.912

Review 4.  Accounting for imperfect detection in ecology: a quantitative review.

Authors:  Kenneth F Kellner; Robert K Swihart
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-10-30       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Modeling stream fish distributions using interval-censored detection times.

Authors:  Mário Ferreira; Ana Filipa Filipe; David C Bardos; Maria Filomena Magalhães; Pedro Beja
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2016-07-13       Impact factor: 2.912

6.  Current and Future Distribution of the Tropical Tree Cedrela odorata L. in Mexico under Climate Change Scenarios Using MaxLike.

Authors:  Israel Estrada-Contreras; Miguel Equihua; Javier Laborde; Enrique Martínez Meyer; Lázaro R Sánchez-Velásquez
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-10-12       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  The value of long-term citizen science data for monitoring koala populations.

Authors:  Ravi Bandara Dissanayake; Mark Stevenson; Rachel Allavena; Joerg Henning
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-07-11       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Model-based control of observer bias for the analysis of presence-only data in ecology.

Authors:  David I Warton; Ian W Renner; Daniel Ramp
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-11-18       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  An iterative and targeted sampling design informed by habitat suitability models for detecting focal plant species over extensive areas.

Authors:  Ophelia Wang; Luke J Zachmann; Steven E Sesnie; Aaryn D Olsson; Brett G Dickson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-07-14       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.