Literature DB >> 25493106

Finite-Sample Equivalence in Statistical Models for Presence-Only Data.

William Fithian1, Trevor Hastie1.   

Abstract

Statistical modeling of presence-only data has attracted much recent attention in the ecological literature, leading to a proliferation of methods, including the inhomogeneous Poisson process (IPP) model, maximum entropy (Maxent) modeling of species distributions and logistic regression models. Several recent articles have shown the close relationships between these methods. We explain why the IPP intensity function is a more natural object of inference in presence-only studies than occurrence probability (which is only defined with reference to quadrat size), and why presence-only data only allows estimation of relative, and not absolute intensity of species occurrence. All three of the above techniques amount to parametric density estimation under the same exponential family model (in the case of the IPP, the fitted density is multiplied by the number of presence records to obtain a fitted intensity). We show that IPP and Maxent give the exact same estimate for this density, but logistic regression in general yields a different estimate in finite samples. When the model is misspecified-as it practically always is-logistic regression and the IPP may have substantially different asymptotic limits with large data sets. We propose "infinitely weighted logistic regression," which is exactly equivalent to the IPP in finite samples. Consequently, many already-implemented methods extending logistic regression can also extend the Maxent and IPP models in directly analogous ways using this technique.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Poisson process models; Presence-only data; case-control sampling; logistic regression; maximum entropy; species modeling

Year:  2013        PMID: 25493106      PMCID: PMC4258396          DOI: 10.1214/13-AOAS667

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Appl Stat        ISSN: 1932-6157            Impact factor:   2.083


  5 in total

1.  On estimating probability of presence from use-availability or presence-background data.

Authors:  Steven J Phillips; Jane Elith
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 5.499

2.  Presence-only data and the em algorithm.

Authors:  Gill Ward; Trevor Hastie; Simon Barry; Jane Elith; John R Leathwick
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  Predicting the geographic distribution of a species from presence-only data subject to detection errors.

Authors:  Robert M Dorazio
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2012-08-31       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  Equivalence of MAXENT and Poisson point process models for species distribution modeling in ecology.

Authors:  Ian W Renner; David I Warton
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2013-02-04       Impact factor: 2.571

5.  Weighted distributions and estimation of resource selection probability functions.

Authors:  Subhash R Lele; Jonah L Keim
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 5.499

  5 in total
  30 in total

1.  Understanding spatial distributions: negative density-dependence in prey causes predators to trade-off prey quantity with quality.

Authors:  Allert I Bijleveld; Robert B MacCurdy; Ying-Chi Chan; Emma Penning; Rich M Gabrielson; John Cluderay; Eric L Spaulding; Anne Dekinga; Sander Holthuijsen; Job ten Horn; Maarten Brugge; Jan A van Gils; David W Winkler; Theunis Piersma
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2016-04-13       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Climate change both facilitates and inhibits invasive plant ranges in New England.

Authors:  Cory Merow; Sarah Treanor Bois; Jenica M Allen; Yingying Xie; John A Silander
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-03-27       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Bias correction in species distribution models: pooling survey and collection data for multiple species.

Authors:  William Fithian; Jane Elith; Trevor Hastie; David A Keith
Journal:  Methods Ecol Evol       Date:  2014-10-10       Impact factor: 7.781

4.  Individual differences in habitat selection mediate landscape level predictions of a functional response.

Authors:  Levi Newediuk; Christina M Prokopenko; Eric Vander Wal
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2022-01-04       Impact factor: 3.225

Review 5.  Conceptual and methodological advances in habitat-selection modeling: guidelines for ecology and evolution.

Authors:  Joseph M Northrup; Eric Vander Wal; Maegwin Bonar; John Fieberg; Michel P Laforge; Martin Leclerc; Christina M Prokopenko; Brian D Gerber
Journal:  Ecol Appl       Date:  2021-11-28       Impact factor: 6.105

6.  Divergent socioeconomic-ecological outcomes of China's Conversion of Cropland to Forest Program in the subtropical mountainous area and the semi-arid Loess Plateau.

Authors:  Qi Zhang; Ying Wang; Shiqi Tao; Richard E Bilsborrow; Tong Qiu; Chong Liu; Srikanta Sannigrahi; Qirui Li; Conghe Song
Journal:  Ecosyst Serv       Date:  2020-08-12       Impact factor: 5.454

7.  Coupling Satellite Data with Species Distribution and Connectivity Models as a Tool for Environmental Management and Planning in Matrix-Sensitive Species.

Authors:  Dennis Rödder; Sven Nekum; Anna F Cord; Jan O Engler
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2016-04-19       Impact factor: 3.266

8.  Limited protection and ongoing loss of tropical cloud forest biodiversity and ecosystems worldwide.

Authors:  Dirk Nikolaus Karger; Michael Kessler; Marcus Lehnert; Walter Jetz
Journal:  Nat Ecol Evol       Date:  2021-04-29       Impact factor: 15.460

Review 9.  Predicting changes in the distribution and abundance of species under environmental change.

Authors:  Johan Ehrlén; William F Morris
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2015-01-22       Impact factor: 9.492

10.  The influence of topographic and dynamic cyclic variables on the distribution of small cetaceans in a shallow coastal system.

Authors:  Marijke N de Boer; Mark P Simmonds; Peter J H Reijnders; Geert Aarts
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-01-22       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.