| Literature DB >> 22936982 |
Hsin-Chiung Lin1, Ja-Liang Lin, Dan-Tzu Lin-Tan, Hui-Kang Ma, Hung-Chi Chen.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To evaluate the treatment outcomes and costs of early keratectomy in the management of moderate Fusarium keratitis. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPALEntities:
Mesh:
Year: 2012 PMID: 22936982 PMCID: PMC3427311 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0042126
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Clinical grading and treatment of fungal keratitis*.
| Grade | Clinical Findings | Treatment |
| Mild | Infiltration not exceeding anterior 1/3 stroma, <3 mm in diameter | Debridement and topical antifungal medication |
| Moderate | Infiltration of 1/3 to 2/3 of the stroma, 3–6 mm in diameter | Debridement or superficial keratectomy, topical/with or without oral antifungal medication |
| Severe | Infiltration deep to inner 1/3 stroma, or >6 mm in diameter | Therapeutic keratoplasty, topical/with or without oral antifungal medication |
As described by Jones [1], with modifications.
Baseline characteristics of patients with moderate severe Fusarium keratitis.
| Keratectomy group ( | Medication group ( |
| ||
| Age (year) | 57.0 (48.0, 59.0) | 62.0 (54.5, 67.0) | 0.060 | |
| Sex | Female | 8 (61.5) | 7 (35.0) | 0.169 |
| Male | 5 (38.5) | 13 (65.0) | ||
| Infected Eye | OD | 4 (30.8) | 9 (45.0) | 0.485 |
| OS | 9 (69.2) | 11 (55.0) | ||
| Diabetes mellitus | 3 (23.1) | 6 (30.0) | >0.999 | |
| Hypertension | 4 (30.8) | 7 (35.0) | >0.999 | |
| Smoking | 2 (15.4) | 2 (10.0) | >0.999 | |
| Initial VA (log Mar) | 1.2 (1.0, 2.0) | 2.0 (1.6, 2.0) | 0.033 | |
| Area of keratitis (mm2) | 12.5 (11.9, 16.0) | 12.6 (9.5, 13.9) | 0.319 | |
| Hypopyon formation | 5 (38.5) | 6 (30.0) | 0.714 | |
Data are presented as median (interquartile range) or number (percentage).
Indicates a signficant difference between the two groups.
Comparison of treatment methods, outcomes, and complications.
| Keratectomy group ( | Medication group ( |
| |
| Hospital stay (d) | 11.0 (9.0, 14.0) | 31.5 (19.5, 49.0) | <0.001 |
| Disease duration (d) | 29.0 (24.0, 33.0) | 54.5 (37.0, 70.0) | <0.001 |
| Hospital cost | |||
| Ward fee | 15175.4±7062.7 | 44159.5±25926.9 | <0.001 |
| Operation room | 3479.0±0 | 4068.3±4642.7 | 0.577 |
| Donor fee | 0±0 | 900.0±923.4 | <0.001 |
| AMG | 0 (0.0%) | 4 (20.0%) | 0.136 |
| Patch graft | 0 (0.0%) | 4 (20.0%) | 0.136 |
| Glaucoma | 0 (0.0%) | 4 (20.0%) | 0.136 |
| Final VA (log Mar) | 0.4 (0.2, 1.1) | 2.0 (0.9, 3.0) | <0.001 |
| Perforation | 0 (0.0%) | 4 (20.0%) | 0.136 |
| Recurrence | 0 (0.0%) | 3 (15.0%) | 0.261 |
| Follow-up time (month) | 6.0 (5.0, 12.0) | 10.0 (6.0, 23.5) | 0.083 |
Hospital stay, disease duration, final VA, and follow-up time were presented as median with IQR. Hospital costs were presented by mean ± standard deviation. Other categorical data are presented by count with percentage.
AMG, amniotic membrane graft; VA, visual acuity.
Indicates a signficant difference between the two groups.
New Taiwan Dollars (NTD).
Data of patients treated with early keratectomy.
| Case | Foreign body | Gender/age/eye/systemic disease/smoking | Keratectomy (days after admission) | Hospital stay (d) | Size of ulcer/depth | Hypopyon | Medications/culture before referral | Adjuvant therapy | Initial VA/Final VA | Complications/follow-up time (months) |
| 1 | Vegetable | F/64/OS/H | 3 | 9 | 3×4 mm | No | Gentamicin/No | No | 0.1/0.4 | None/6 |
| 2 | UFB | F/77/OS/smoking | 6 | 14 | 3.5×3 mm | Yes | Norfloxacin/No | No | CF 40 cm/0.06 | None/6 |
| 3 | UFB | F/62/OS/DM | 3 | 11 | 4×4 mm | No | Acyclovir, Ciprofloxacin/No | No | CF 30 cm/0.08 | None/7 |
| 4 | NA | F/39/OS/H | 2 | 3 | 4.5×3.8 mm | Yes | NA | No | CF 50 cm/0.06 | None/5 |
| 5 | Iron dust | M/41/OS | 3 | 9 | 4×6 mm | No | Gentamicin/No | No | HM 10 cm/0.7 | None/4 |
| 6 | NA | M/48/OD | 4 | 10 | 3.6×3.3 mm | Yes | NA | No | 0.8/1.0 | None/36 |
| 7 | Dirt | F/37/OS | 5 | 8 | 3×3 mm | No | Ciprofloxacin/No | No | 0.3/0.7 | None/4 |
| 8 | Flower | F/56/OD | 2 | 4 | 3×3 mm | No | Levofloxacin/No | No | 0.4/0.5 | None/3 |
| 9 | Dirt | M/57/OS/H | 6 | 23 | 6×4 mm | Yes | Norfloxacin/no growth | No | 0.1/0.3 | None/12 |
| 10 | Plastic | F/57/OD/DM | 6 | 14 | 3.5×3.5 mm | No | Oral famciclovir, dexan, ciprofloxacin/No | No | CF 30 cm/0.7 | None/5 |
| 11 | Vegetable | M/53/OS | 3 | 20 | 4.5×3 mm | No | Norfloxacin/No | No | CF 1 m/0.4 | None/6 |
| 12 | UFB | F/59/OS | 4 | 16 | 2.5×5 mm | Yes | Gentamicin/No | No | 0.1/0.05 | None/14 |
| 13 | UFB | M/57/OD/DM, HTN/smoking | 3 | 11 | 4×4 mm | No | NA/No | No | 0.05/0.1 | None/12 |
F, female; M, male; DM, diabetes mellitus; HTN, hypertension; UFB, unknown foreign body; CF, counting finger visual acuity; NA, not applicable.
Adjuvant therapy other than early keratectomy. Disease duration: healing of epithelial defect. Final visual VA: determined upon healing of the epithelial defect.
Figure 1Kaplan-Meier survival analysis of corneal perforation.
Figure 2Clinical photography.
1. Clinical photographs of 57-year-old female. A) On presentation a corneal infiltrate with a feathery margin and anterior chamber inflammation were noted. Initial visual acuity was CF 30 cm. Initial debridement was performed. B) Progression of the keratitis 7 days later despite initial debridement. C) One month after superficial keratectomy and treatment with natamycin suspension. The ulcer was healed and best-corrected visual acuity was 0.7. 2. A 56-year-old female who presented with right eye pain 10 days after a foreign body injury. A) The paracentral corneal lesion appeared dry, rough, and elevated. Visual acuity 0.4. The other cornea was not inflamed. B) One week after superficial keratectomy, the lesion was healed and appeared thinned. Visual acuity 0.5. 3. A 66-year-old male. A) Central, fluffy corneal infiltration was noted on presentation. Visual acuity was hand motion. B) Three days later the infiltration had progressed with descementocele formation (C) despite topical natamycin therapy. He then received amniotic membrane transplantation as adjuvant therapy for the imminent perforation. D) Eleven months later a cataract surgery was performed and visual acuity remained counting fingers due to central scarring.