Literature DB >> 17332960

Prone thoracoscopic esophageal mobilization for minimally invasive esophagectomy.

T Fabian1, A A McKelvey, M S Kent, J A Federico.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Minimally invasive esophagectomy is a complex surgical procedure. We recently began performing thoracic mobilization of the esophagus with the patient in the prone position, not the left lateral decubitus position, in the hope of minimizing the number of technical challenges.
METHODS: Six consecutive minimally invasive esophagectomies were performed using prone thoracoscopic esophageal mobilization with creation of cervical anastamosis. Our esophagectomy database was evaluated for outcomes, including operative time, estimated blood loss, complications, and length of hospital stay.
RESULTS: We were successful in our first six attempts, with a mean blood loss of 61 cc. Mean operative time for thoracoscopy was 80 min. Operative times were steady over the first six prone cases at 105, 85, 70, 55, 80, and 85 min. Three of the six patients had no complications. Median postoperative length of hospital stay was 11.5 days, and there were no deaths.
CONCLUSIONS: This technical report and case series demonstrates that prone thoracoscopic esophageal mobilization appears to be a reasonable alternative to the same procedure performed with the patient in the decubitus position. We find the technique to simplify portions of an otherwise difficult surgical procedure. Further evaluation with larger number of patients should be performed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17332960     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-007-9193-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  4 in total

1.  Minimally invasive esophagectomy: thoracoscopic mobilization of the esophagus and mediastinal lymphadenectomy in prone position--experience of 130 patients.

Authors:  Chinnusamy Palanivelu; Anand Prakash; Rangaswamy Senthilkumar; Palanisamy Senthilnathan; Ramakrishnan Parthasarathi; Pidigu Seshiyer Rajan; S Venkatachlam
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 6.113

2.  Eliminating the cervical esophagogastric anastomotic leak with a side-to-side stapled anastomosis.

Authors:  M B Orringer; B Marshall; M D Iannettoni
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 5.209

3.  Thoracoscopic subtotal oesophagectomy.

Authors:  A Cuschieri
Journal:  Endosc Surg Allied Technol       Date:  1994-02

4.  Minimally invasive esophagectomy: outcomes in 222 patients.

Authors:  James D Luketich; Miguel Alvelo-Rivera; Percival O Buenaventura; Neil A Christie; James S McCaughan; Virginia R Litle; Philip R Schauer; John M Close; Hiran C Fernando
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 12.969

  4 in total
  22 in total

1.  Technique of minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagogastrectomy with intrathoracic stapled side-to-side anastomosis.

Authors:  Kfir Ben-David; George A Sarosi; Juan C Cendan; Steven N Hochwald
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2010-06-08       Impact factor: 3.452

2.  A pilot study of the technical and oncologic feasibility of thoracoscopic esophagectomy with extended lymph node dissection in the prone position for clinical stage I thoracic esophageal carcinoma.

Authors:  Hiroyuki Daiko; Mitsuyo Nishimura
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-09-23       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 3.  Thoracoscopic esophagectomy in the prone position.

Authors:  Omar A Jarral; Sanjay Purkayastha; Thanos Athanasiou; Ara Darzi; George B Hanna; Emmanouil Zacharakis
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-03-07       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 4.  Minimally invasive esophagectomy.

Authors:  Fernando A Herbella; Marco G Patti
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-08-14       Impact factor: 5.742

5.  Thoracoscopic esophageal mobilization during minimally invasive esophagectomy: a head-to-head comparison of prone versus decubitus positions.

Authors:  Thomas Fabian; Jeremiah Martin; Mario Katigbak; Alicia A McKelvey; John A Federico
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-03-05       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Pressure-controlled versus volume-controlled ventilation during one-lung ventilation in the prone position for robot-assisted esophagectomy.

Authors:  Yong Seon Choi; Jae Kwang Shim; Sungwon Na; Seung Bum Hong; Yong Woo Hong; Young Jun Oh
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-01-30       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Lateral position could provide more excellent hemodynamic parameters during video-assisted thoracoscopic esophagectomy for cancer.

Authors:  Ying-Bo Zou; Hong Yan; Xue-Hai Liu; Yin-Jie Zhao; Yao-Guang Jiang; Ru-Wen Wang; Wei Guo
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-04-13       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Two-lung ventilation in the prone position: is it the standard anesthetic management for thoracoscopic esophagectomy?

Authors:  Hiroya Takeuchi; Yuko Kitagawa
Journal:  Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2014-02-04

9.  A novel method for lymphadenectomy along the left laryngeal recurrent nerve during thoracoscopic esophagectomy for esophageal carcinoma.

Authors:  Yong Xi; Zhenkai Ma; Yaxing Shen; Hao Wang; Mingxiang Feng; Lijie Tan; Qun Wang
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 2.895

10.  Minimally invasive esophagectomy for cancer: laparoscopic transhiatal procedure or thoracoscopy in prone position followed by laparoscopy?

Authors:  G Dapri; J Himpens; G B Cadière
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-12-11       Impact factor: 4.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.