In response to intense stress, the tumor protein p53 (p53) tumor suppressor rapidly mounts a direct mitochondrial death program that precedes transcription-mediated apoptosis. By eliminating severely damaged cells, this pathway contributes to tumor suppression as well as to cancer cell killing induced by both genotoxic drugs and non-genotoxic p53-reactivating molecules. Here we have explored the role had in this pathway by the prolyl-isomerase Pin1 (peptidylprolyl cis/trans isomerase, NIMA-interacting 1), a crucial transducer of p53's phosphorylation into conformational changes unleashing its pro-apoptotic activity. We show that Pin1 promotes stress-induced localization of p53 to mitochondria both in vitro and in vivo. In particular, we demonstrate that upon stress-induced phosphorylation of p53 on Ser46 by homeodomain interacting protein kinase 2, Pin1 stimulates its mitochondrial trafficking signal, that is, monoubiquitination. This pathway is induced also by the p53-activating molecule RITA, and we demonstrate the strong requirement of Pin1 for the induction of mitochondrial apoptosis by this compound. These findings have significant implications for treatment of p53-expressing tumors and for prospective use of p53-activating compounds in clinics.
In response to intense stress, the tumor protein p53 (p53) tumor suppressor rapidly mounts a direct mitochondrial death program that precedes transcription-mediated apoptosis. By eliminating severely damaged cells, this pathway contributes to tumor suppression as well as to cancer cell killing induced by both genotoxic drugs and non-genotoxic p53-reactivating molecules. Here we have explored the role had in this pathway by the prolyl-isomerase Pin1 (peptidylprolyl cis/trans isomerase, NIMA-interacting 1), a crucial transducer of p53's phosphorylation into conformational changes unleashing its pro-apoptotic activity. We show that Pin1 promotes stress-induced localization of p53 to mitochondria both in vitro and in vivo. In particular, we demonstrate that upon stress-induced phosphorylation of p53 on Ser46 by homeodomain interacting protein kinase 2, Pin1 stimulates its mitochondrial trafficking signal, that is, monoubiquitination. This pathway is induced also by the p53-activating molecule RITA, and we demonstrate the strong requirement of Pin1 for the induction of mitochondrial apoptosis by this compound. These findings have significant implications for treatment of p53-expressing tumors and for prospective use of p53-activating compounds in clinics.
Among the biological activities of tumor protein p53 (p53), induction of apoptosis has a
prominent role in tumor suppression by eliminating incipient cancer cells and in mediating
cytotoxic effects that in part determine the success of conventional cancer treatments.
p53-dependent apoptosis has a pleiotropic nature; in addition to affecting the balance
between pro- and anti-apoptotic factors at the transcriptional level, p53 also directly
modulates the functions of some of these factors at the mitochondria, thus triggering
successive waves of mitochondrial outer membrane permeabilization (MOMP) in response to
acute and sustained stress conditions.[1, 2] A common early event in p53-mediated apoptosis induced by
cytotoxic and hypoxic conditions is the rapid (within 30 min) translocation of
cytoplasmic p53 to mitochondria,[3] where it
interacts with members of the Bcl family of mitochondrial permeability regulators, including
Bak, Bcl2 and Bcl-XL, to either inhibit or activate them (see ref. 1) for a comprehensive review). This causes MOMP and apoptosis that precedes
target gene activation by p53.[4] It has been clearly
shown that transcription-independent apoptotic activity of p53 is important for tumor
suppression.[5, 6,
7] However, the exact mechanism responsible for
stress-induced mitochondrial accumulation and activation of p53 is not yet fully
understood.We previously demonstrated that upon severe stress stimuli, the activity of the
prolyl-isomerase Pin1 (peptidylprolyl cis/trans isomerase, NIMA-interacting 1) is
crucial for enabling p53 to take the apoptotic route of stress response.[8, 9, 10] Pin1 catalyzes cis/trans isomerization of proline bonds preceded
by phosphorylated serine or threonine residues (pSer/Thr-Pro), thereby altering
structure and functions of its substrates in response to specific cues.[11, 12] Upon genotoxic
insults, Pin1 binds multiple sites on p53, promoting its dissociation both from HDM2 with
consequent accumulation in stressed cells,[8, 13] and from the apoptosis inhibitor iASPP through
isomerization of the phospho-Ser46-Pro47 motif, thus unleashing p53's full apoptotic
potential.[9, 10]
However, the impact of Pin1 isomerization in controlling p53 function by altering its
sub-cellular trafficking has never been addressed.With this work, we shed light on the mechanisms promoting p53's direct mitochondrial
death program by demonstrating a central role for the prolyl-isomerase Pin1 in regulating
this p53 apoptotic route in response to several stress signals.
Results
Pin1 potentiates the transcription-independent apoptotic activity of
p53
To verify whether Pin1 could modulate the direct apoptotic activity of p53 at
mitochondria, we employed a nuclear import-deficient p53 construct (p53NLS, Figure 1a) shown to efficiently localize at mitochondria and
induce apoptosis when overexpressed in p53-null cancer cells.[14] At first, we decided to investigate the impact of p53 and Pin1
on the mitochondrial calcium (Ca2+) response after agonist stimulation
as a highly sensitive readout of mitochondrial state. Indeed, mitochondrial alterations
cause defects in Ca2+ uptake by the organelle.[15] To this end, we employed a mitochondria-targeted chimera of the
Ca2+-sensitive photoprotein aequorin.[16]
Figure 1
Pin1 potentiates p53-mediated transcription-independent apoptosis. (a) Scheme of
p53 expression constructs indicating Pin1-binding sites (phospho-Ser/Thr-Pro). TA,
transactivation domain; DBD, DNA binding domain; NLS, nuclear localization signal. The
nuclear import-deficient p53 mutant p53NLS has mutations in all three C-terminal NLS
motifs. p53-M bears Ser/Thr to Ala substitutions at Pin1 binding sites Ser33, Ser46,
Thr81 and Ser315. p53NLS-M bears Ser/Thr to Ala substitutions at Ser33, Ser46 and
Thr81. (b) Mitochondrial Ca2+ analysis in H1299 cells
overexpressing p53NLS alone or co-transfected with Pin1. H1299 cells were co-transfected
with an aequorin chimera targeted to the mitochondrial matrix and with either the
plasmid of interest or an empty vector (control). Thirty-six hours after transfection,
measurement of aequorin luminescence was carried out and calibrated into
[Ca2+] values, as described in the Materials and Methods
section. Where indicated, the cells, perfused with KRB, were challenged with
100 μM ATP, added to the same buffer. Peak values
1.58±0.03 μM for control (solid line) n=14;
1.18±0.09 μM for p53 NLS (dotted line) n=13,
P<0.01; p53NLS plus Pin1 (dashed line)
0.93±0.04 μM, n=9, P<0.01. These
and the following traces are representative of at least 10 experiments, that gave
similar results. (c) p53NLS was overexpressed in p53-null H1299 cells either
alone or along with Pin1-HA. The percentage of cells undergoing apoptosis upon treatment
with etoposide 50 μM for 24 h was estimated by
AnnexinV/propidium-iodide staining and FACS analysis. The graph shows mean results
and S.D. of three independent experiments. (d) Mitochondrial Ca2+
response was performed as above, comparing H1299 cells overexpressing p53NLS with p53NLS
M proteins. Peak values: control and p53NLS are as in b. p53 NLS-M
1.57±0.05 μM, n=12. (e) The ability
of p53NLS and p53NLS-M proteins to induce transcription-independent apoptosis was
compared by AnnexinV/propidium-iodide staining and FACS analysis upon overexpression
in p53-null H1299 cells and treatment with etoposide 50 μM for
24 h. The graph shows mean results and S.D. of three independent experiments.
(f) The effect of Pin1 overexpression on release of cytochrome c from
mitochondria to the cytoplasm was detected by WB after subcellular fractionation of
H1299 cells transfected with the indicated constructs and treated with etoposide
50 μM for 24 h
We investigated the Ca2+ response to ATP, which acts on
Gq-coupled plasmamembrane receptors and causes the production of inositol
1,4,5 trisphosphate, thus releasing Ca2+ from the ER to mitochondria. We
observed that the overexpression of p53NLS alone caused a 31% decrease in
amplitude of the Ca2+ spike evoked by agonist stimulation as compared
with control cells, as a consequence of mitochondrial damage. More interestingly,
co-overexpression of Pin1 further potentiated mitochondrial Ca2+
alterations induced by p53NLS, thus amplifying the mitochondrial damage (Figure 1b). Similar results were obtained in HCT116
p53−/− cells (Supplementary Figure
1G).We then tested the effect of Pin1 on the ability of p53NLS to exert
transcription-independent apoptosis. Annexin V-FACS analysis and poly (ADP-ribose)
polymerase (PARP) cleavage assay highlighted that co-expression of Pin1 caused a
significant increase of apoptosis induced by p53NLS upon etoposide treatment (Figure 1c and Supplementary Figure
1H). Conversely, p53NLS-dependent apoptosis was reduced by twofold
following short interfering RNA (RNAi)-mediated knockdown of Pin1 expression (Supplementary Figure 1A). Activation of the mitochondrial
apoptotic pathway was demonstrated by the release of cytochrome c from mitochondria to
the cytoplasm, and notably this was higher in cells overexpressing Pin1 (Figure 1f).To confirm the role of Pin1 in transcription-independent apoptosis induced by
endogenous p53, we treated HCT116 p53+/+ cells with the RNA polymerase II
inhibitor α-amanitin, which was previously shown to completely block
p53-dependent transcription (Supplementary Figure 1B),
yet induce apoptosis via the p53 mitochondrial program.[3, 17] RNAi-mediated knockdown of
Pin1 expression resulted in significant reduction of transcription-independent apoptosis
induced by etoposide treatment (Supplementary Figure
1C).We next asked whether direct modification of p53 by Pin1 is required for enhancing its
transcription-independent apoptotic activity, similar to what occurs with nuclear p53
during induction of apoptotic target genes.[9]
Cytotoxic stress conditions in fact strongly promote the interaction of cytoplasmic
p53NLS with Pin1 (Supplementary Figures 1D and 3A). We
generated a p53NLS construct with Ser/Thr-to-Ala substitutions disrupting the major
Pin1-binding sites (phospho-Ser/Thr-Pro)[8,
9] at residues 33, 46 and 81 (p53NLS-M, Figure 1a), thus severely reducing the binding to Pin1 (Supplementary Figure 1E). Notably, in contrast to p53NLS,
overexpression of p53NLS-M had little or no effect on the mitochondrial
Ca2+ uptake of H1299 cells (Figure 1d).
Moreover, the ability of p53NLS-M to induce apoptosis upon treatment with etoposide was
significantly reduced as compared with p53NLS (Figure 1e).
In further support, as compared with wild-type full-length p53, p53-M (Figure 1a) was almost unable of inducing transcription-independent
apoptosis when overexpressed in the presence of α-amanitin (Supplementary Figure 1F). Taken together, these data suggest
that modification of p53 by Pin1 is an essential step for optimal execution of
transcription-independent p53-mediated apoptosis at mitochondria.
Pin1 is required for efficient mitochondrial localization of p53
A key step during induction of transcription-independent apoptosis is the
relocalization of cytoplasmic p53 to mitochondria in response to apoptotic
stimuli.[3, 18] Thus, we investigated whether modification by Pin1 affects the
mitochondrial localization of p53 induced by DNA damage. Mitochondria were isolated from
HCT116 p53+/+ cells after treatment with cytotoxic doses of
chemotherapeutic drugs for 6 h. As compared with untreated cells, both
doxorubicin and etoposide treatments caused accumulation of p53 at mitochondria, in
agreement with published data,[18] whereas the
mitochondrial fraction of Pin1 remained unchanged (Supplementary
Figure 2A). Notably, mitochondrial accumulation of p53 in drug-treated
cells was strongly increased by Pin1 overexpression and reduced by RNAi-mediated
knockdown of Pin1 (Figure 2a, and Supplementary Figure 2A and B). Importantly, the overexpression of
siRNA-resistant wild-type Pin1 rescued p53's mitochondrial translocation, whereas
a catalytic inactive Pin1 mutant (S67E) failed to exert this effect (Figure 2a). This highlights the importance of Pin1 isomerase activity in
inducing p53's proapoptotic function. In further support, in vitro
translated p53 was able to bind its mitochondrial partner BclXL only after isomerization
by catalytically active Pin1 (Supplementary Figure
2C).
Figure 2
Pin1 stimulates mitochondrial localization of p53. (a) The effect of Pin1
depletion and overexpression on mitochondrial accumulation of endogenous p53 protein was
analyzed by WB on both mitochondrial fractions and total lysates of HCT116
p53+/+ cells. Cells were transduced with retroviral vector pMSCV
expressing either Pin1-HA, siRNA-resistant (SR) Pin1-HA, siRNA-resistant Pin1-HA-S67E
(catalytically inactive) or empty vector, and then transfected with Pin1-specific RNAi
or control RNAi. Forty-eight hours after transfection, cells were treated with
doxorubicin (Dox) 1 μM for 6 h and processed for subcellular
fractionation. (b) Rapid mitochondrial localization of p53 in cardiac muscle
in vivo was compared in wt (Pin1+/+) and Pin1-KO
(Pin1−/−) mice treated IP with 20 mg/kg of doxorubicin for
3 h. Western blots show p53 content in total lysate (TOT) of heart tissue and in
mitochondrial fraction (MITO). Mitochondrial purity from nuclear contamination was
verified by Lamin B WB. (c) The ability of p53-WT and p53-M proteins (Figure 1a)
to localize at mitochondria was compared as in Figure 2a upon transfection in HCT116
p53−/− cells and treatment with doxorubicin (Dox)
1 μM for 6 h. (d) The effect of Pin1 on the balance
between mono- and polyubiquitinated forms of p53 was analyzed in H1299 cells transfected
with constructs expressing p53, HA-ubiquitin and Pin1 in the indicated combinations, and
then treated with doxorubicin 1 μM for 6 h and with the
proteasome inhibitor MG-132 50 μM for 4 h before IP and WB
analysis
Direct mitochondrial activity of p53 has been implicated in radiation and drug
sensitivity in vivo; genotoxic treatments induce mitochondrial accumulation of
p53 in radio- and chemosensitive mouse organs, leading to rapid apoptosis;[4] moreover, inhibition of mitochondrial p53 activity
protects mice from effects of lethal γ-radiation.[19] Thus, we sought to determine the impact of Pin1 on
the p53-dependent mitochondrial response in vivo. To this end, we treated
wild-type and Pin1-KO mice with a cardiotoxic dose of doxorubicin, and analyzed early
mitochondrial accumulation of p53 in cardiac muscle, a tissue particularly rich in
mitochondria and a major site of doxorubicin-related toxicity. Strikingly, although p53
accumulated to high levels at mitochondria of treated wild-type mice, this response was
absent in tissues lacking Pin1 (Figure 2b), suggesting that
Pin1 is essential for mitochondrial localization and mitochondrial functions of p53
in vivo.Likewise, impaired mitochondrial accumulation upon doxorubicin and defective
transcription-independent apoptosis was also observed in HCT116 p53−/−
cells transfected with the p53-M mutant lacking the major Pin1-binding sites (Figure 2c and Supplementary Figure
1F), confirming that direct modification by Pin1 alters p53's ability
to associate with mitochondria. Importantly, after lethal irradiation of wild-type and
Pin1-KO mice, bone marrow cells derived from Pin1-KO animals were resistant to apoptosis
as compared with wild-type counterparts (Supplementary Figure
2D). This difference was however not observed for thymocytes, thus
suggesting a potential tissue-specific proapoptotic activity of Pin1 in
vivo.One important post-translational modification regulating mitochondrial translocation of
p53 is monoubiquitination.[3] Interestingly, Pin1
was found to affect p53's mono- versus polyubiquitination
ratio.[20] Importantly, consistent with this
notion, upon overexpression of Pin1, we observed a marked decrease of the
polyubiquitinated p53 pool in H1299 cells treated with doxorubicin
1 μM for 6 h (Figure 2d,
analyzed in the presence of the proteasome inhibitor MG132 for optimal visualization).
Conversely, overexpression of Pin1 favored the increase of monoubiquitinated p53 species
(Figure 2d). This observation may explain the mechanism by
which Pin1 drives the mitochondrial localization of p53.
Pin1 induces mitochondrial function of p53 in a Ser46-dependent fashion
To gain insights into the mechanism by which modification by Pin1 may increase p53
monoubiquitination, we first sought to determine which Pin1-target site(s) on p53 is
responsible for activating p53-mediated mitochondrial apoptosis. Ser46 phosphorylation
is determinant for transcriptional apoptotic activity of p53[21, 22] induced by a Pin1-dependent
mechanism.[9, 10] We generated a cytosolic p53 construct mimicking the absence of
Ser46 phosphorylation (p53NLS-S46A). As compared with its wild-type counterpart,
p53NLS-S46A displayed greatly reduced binding to Pin1 (Supplementary Figure 3A), suggesting that phospho-Ser46-Pro47 represents a
major Pin1-binding site on cytosolic p53. p53NLS-S46A displayed reduced mitochondrial
localization in doxorubicin-treated cells (Figure 3a and
Supplementary Figure 3B) and was consequently impaired
for mitochondrial activities, that is, alteration of the mitochondrial Ca2+ uptake
(Figure 3b) and induction of transcription-independent
apoptosis (Figure 3c). Importantly, the weak apoptotic
activity of p53NLS-S46A could not be potentiated by overexpression of Pin1 (Figure 3c), indicating that Ser46 phosphorylation is indeed the
determinant for inducing mitochondrial apoptosis by a Pin1-dependent mechanism.
Consistent with this notion, Pin1 was able to increase monoubiquitination of wild type,
but not of S46A-mutated p53 (Supplementary Figure
2E).
Figure 3
Pin1 induces the mitochondrial function of p53 in a Ser46-dependent fashion. (a)
The ability of p53-WT, p53-S46A and p53-M proteins to localize at mitochondria was
compared by WB on the mitochondrial fraction upon transfection in HCT116
p53−/− cells and treatment with etoposide 50 μM for
6 h. Left panels: a representative experiment is shown. Right panel:
quantification of relative mitochondrial localization of different p53 proteins was
calculated as described in Methods section. The graph shows the mean results and S.D. of
three independent experiments. (b) Mitochondrial Ca2+ response
was performed as above, comparing H1299 cells overexpressing p53NLS with p53NLS S46A
proteins. Peak values 1.57±0.03 μM for control,
1.51±0.06 μM for p53NLS S46A, n=10 each,
versus 1.20±0.04 μM for p53NLS, P<0.01.
(c) The ability of p53NLS and p53NLS-S46A proteins to induce
transcription-independent apoptosis upon treatment with etoposide
50 μM for 24 h, and the relative effect of overexpression of
Pin1-HA was compared by AnnexinV/PI staining and FACS analysis upon transfection of
the indicated combinations of plasmids in H1299 cells. The graph shows the mean results
and S.D. of three independent experiments
HIPK2 and Pin1 cooperate to induce direct apoptotic activity of p53 at
mitochondria
The above results suggest that p53's apoptotic activity at mitochondria is
triggered by upstream stimuli inducing Ser46 phosphorylation. In fact, a 6-h treatment
with doxorubicin, which is sufficient to induce mitochondrial accumulation of p53
(Supplementary Figure 2A), also triggers its robust
phosphorylation on this Pin1-binding site (Supplementary Figure
4A). In these conditions, we observed stabilization of the proapoptotic
homeodomain-interacting protein kinase-2 (HIPK2; Supplementary
Figure 4B), which phosphorylates p53 at Ser46.[23, 24] We thus hypothesized that
HIPK2 could act as an important mediator in activating both the nuclear and
mitochondrial apoptotic pathways of p53.To directly address the question whether HIPK2 might promote p53 localization to
mitochondria, we knocked down HIPK2 expression by RNAi in HCT116 p53+/+
cells and consequently observed a decrease of stress-induced mitochondrial accumulation
of p53 (Figure 4a and Supplementary
Figure 4C). Conversely, overexpression of wild-type HIPK2 kinase, but not
of the catalytic inactive mutant HIPK2-K221R, potentiated doxorubicin-induced
accumulation of p53 at mitochondria (Figure 4b and Supplementary Figure 4C). Notably, Pin1 appears to be essential
for this effect, as HIPK2 failed to trigger mitochondrial translocation of p53 upon Pin1
silencing (Figure 4c). Confirming this notion,
transcription-independent apoptosis triggered by forced expression of HIPK2 in the
presence of α-amanitin also required Pin1 (Figure
4d). In summary, these data suggest that upon genotoxic stress, rapid
phosphorylation on Ser46 mediated by HIPK2 drives early activation of p53. Pin1 is then
required to further modify Ser46-phosphorylated p53, thus enabling its translocation to
mitochondria and triggering direct apoptosis.
Figure 4
HIPK2 and Pin1 cooperate to induce p53-dependent direct apoptosis. (a) HIPK2
promotes mitochondrial localization of p53. Accumulation of endogenous p53 within the
mitochondrial fraction of HCT116 p53+/+ cells was analyzed by WB upon
RNAi-mediated knockdown of HIPK2 and treatment with doxorubicin 1 μM
for 6 h. C: control RNAi. (b) Mitochondrial localization of endogenous p53
upon overexpression of either wild-type HIPK2 or the catalytically inactive mutant
HIPK2K221R in HCT116 p53+/+ cells and treatment with
1 μM doxorubicin for 6 h was analyzed as in a.
(c) Pin1 is required for the ability of HIPK2 to promote mitochondrial
localization of p53. The effect of wild-type HIPK2 overexpression on the mitochondrial
localization of endogenous p53 was evaluated as in a in HCT116
p53+/+ cells treated with doxorubicin 1 μM for
6 h upon RNAi-mediated knockdown of Pin1 expression. (d) To estimate the
roles of HIPK2 and Pin1 in inducing transcription-independent apoptosis, HCT116
p53+/+ cells transfected with the indicated combinations of GFP-HIPK2
expression vector and Pin1-specific RNAi were treated with α-amanitin
10 μg/ml. Apoptosis of GFP-expressing cells was then evaluated
by TUNEL assays. The graph shows the mean results and S.D. of three independent
experiments
Pin1 is essential for transcription-independent apoptosis induced by RITA in
transformed cells
The small molecule RITA (reactivation of p53 and induction of tumor cell apoptosis) has
been described as being able to activate wild-type p53's apoptotic function with
consequent antitumor activity. Mechanistically, RITA disrupts the p53-HDM2 complex by
binding to p53[25] and induces HIPK2
stabilization with consequent phosphorylation of p53 on Ser46.[26] On these premises, we investigated the ability of RITA to induce
p53's direct mitochondrial activity. We analyzed cell viability upon
administration of RITA in combination with α-amanitin to HCT116
p53+/+ and HCT116 p53−/− cells. RITA induced HIPK2
stabilization and consequent phosphorylation of p53 on Ser46 (Supplementary Figure 5A) and caused p53-dependent cytotoxicity (Figure 5a, and Supplementary Figure 5B and
C) through both transcription-dependent and -independent pathways (Figures 5a and c). Indeed, a clear accumulation of endogenous p53
was observed in the mitochondrial fraction of RITA-treated HCT116 p53+/+
cells (Figure 5b). Induction of p53-Ser46 phosphorylation
(Rinaldo et al[26] and Supplementary Figure 5A) was required for the pro-apoptotic
effect of RITA, given that the p53-S46A mutant failed to efficiently localize at
mitochondria in response to RITA treatment (Supplementary Figure
5D). Importantly, reducing Pin1 expression with RNAi strongly inhibited
RITA-induced mitochondrial p53 accumulation (Figure 5b) and
transcription-independent apoptosis (Figure 5c). The
observed requirement of Pin1 for RITA-dependent cytotoxicity may offer a possible
explanation for RITA's selective apoptotic effect in tumor cells, as opposed to
its inefficiency in normal cells.[25, 27] Indeed, Pin1 is frequently overexpressed in many
common cancers, including mammary, prostate, colorectal and hepatic ([28] and references therein). To test the role of Pin1 in
determining the outcome of RITA treatment in transformed versus non-transformed
cells, we employed MCF10A normal mammary epithelial cells where either
HRASV12 or empty vector were stably inserted. Consistent with the notion
that Pin1 expression is enhanced by HRAS,[29,
30] MCF10A-HRASV12 cells exhibited
elevated Pin1 levels as compared with parental cells (Figure
5d). Treatment with RITA led to significant induction of apoptosis (as
estimated by PARP cleavage) only in RAS-transformed cells (Figure
5d), and importantly, this response could be efficiently inhibited by
reducing Pin1 expression by RNAi (Figure 5e). Consistently,
subcellular fractionation highlighted that RITA treatment induced mitochondrial
accumulation of p53 in RAS-transformed cells (Figure 5f) but
not in control MCF10A cells (Supplementary Figure 5E).
This effect was significantly reduced by depleting Pin1 by RNAi (Figure 5f). Of note, overexpression of Pin1 in parental MCF10A cells was
sufficient to shift the response to RITA treatment towards apoptosis (Supplementary Figure 5F). Taken together, these data strongly
suggest that Pin1 expression levels are an important determinant of cancer cell
sensitivity to RITA-induced cytotoxicity by favoring direct mitochondrial apoptosis.
Figure 5
Pin1 expression is required for RITA-induced transcription-independent apoptosis.
(a) HCT116 p53+/+ cells were treated with RITA
1 μM alone or in combination with α-amanitin
10 μg/ml or left untreated. Cell viability was analyzed after
24 h. The graph shows the mean results and S.D. of three independent experiments.
(b) The effect of Pin1 depletion by RNAi on mitochondrial localization of
endogenous p53 protein upon treatment of HCT116 p53+/+ cells with RITA
1 μM for 24 h was analyzed by WB of mitochondrial fractions
and total cell lysates. C: control RNAi. (c) HCT116 p53+/+ cells
were transfected with Pin1-specific or control (C) siRNA before treatment with RITA
1 μM and α-amanitin 10 μg/ml
for 24 h. The percentage of cells with sub-G1 DNA content (apoptotic cells) was
estimated by PI staining and FACS analysis. The graph shows the mean results and S.D. of
three independent experiments. (d) MCF10A cells stably transfected with either
HRASV12 or empty vector (pLPC) were treated with RITA
1 μM for 24 h. Induction of apoptosis was then monitored by
analyzing PARP cleavage by WB. The expression levels of HIPK2, p53, RAS and Pin1 were
also compared by WB, using actin levels as loading control. (e) The effect of
Pin1 depletion by RNAi on apoptosis of MCF10A-HRASV12 transformed cells upon
treatment with RITA 1 μM for 24 h was analyzed by monitoring
PARP cleavage by WB. (f) The effect of Pin1 depletion by RNAi on mitochondrial
localization of endogenous p53 protein upon treatment of MCF10A-HRASV12
transformed cells with RITA 1 μM for 24 h was analyzed by WB
of both mitochondrial fractions and total cell lysates
Discussion
Recent years have brought a significant advancement in understanding the contribution of
various partners and co-factors in determining numerous aspects of the p53
pathway.[31, 32] Among these, the prolyl-isomerase Pin1, a phospho-specific
transducer of post-translational modifications for numerous key signaling molecules,
surely is one of the most interesting.[12]
Although many evidences established the essential role of Pin1 in the
transcription-dependent functions on p53 in the nucleus,[8, 9, 33]
to our knowledge no data have supported an involvement of Pin1 in other key aspects of
p53's growth-suppressive activities, such as its mitochondrial death program.In this work, we demonstrate the strong requirement of this isomerase in the very early
phases of p53-dependent apoptosis by controlling its mitochondrial accumulation and
activation. The transcription-independent death program of p53 may be regarded as an
attractive pathway to be exploited for therapeutic intervention. Therefore, in addition to
provide insights into the yet poorly understood mechanisms of p53-dependent mitochondrial
apoptosis, our results also carry implications for the effectiveness of anticancer
treatments.A role for Pin1 at the mitochondria level has been shown in controlling the activity of
apoptosis regulators such as Bcl2,[34]
BIMEL[35] and p66Shc[16] in response to various extra- and intracellular stimuli. Our
results demonstrating that, through isomerization of Ser46-phosphorylated p53, Pin1
promotes its mitochondrial trafficking signal (i.e., monoubiquitination) and translocation
to these organelles further extends the cellular functions of the Pin1 isomerase. It is
well known that by promoting p53 prolyl-isomerization, Pin1 lowers its affinity for HDM2
(8), and that low cellular levels of HDM2 favor p53 monoubiquitination and mitochondrial
translocation.[3, 36] Moreover, it has been shown that Pin1 inhibition results in
decreased p53 monoubiquitination in favor of polyubiquitination.[20] Together, these and our evidences raise the possibility that by
priming Pin1-dependent conformational changes of p53, phosphorylation at Ser46 on p53
represents a key event in promoting its monoubiquitination and underlines the pivotal role
of Pin1 in p53 mitochondrial relocalization and function. In this regard, we have shown
that phosphorylation of p53 on Ser46 by the pro-apoptotic kinase HIPK2 is both necessary
and sufficient for subsequent Pin1-mediated engagement of p53 to mitochondria where,
facilitated by resident HDMX, it may then interact with Bcl2 as proposed by Mancini et
al.[37] Pin1 has been reported to localize
in nucleus, cytoplasm and mitochondria, and it may act both in the cytoplasm, by
triggering mitochondrial translocation of p53, and directly on the mitochondria, by
increasing the retention of p53 in this compartment.Our findings might also explain the reported impact of the p53 codon 72 Pro/Arg
polymorphism on direct mitochondrial activity of p53. The Arg72 isoform displays higher
mitochondrial translocation,[38] and indeed, we
have found this variant to be more phosphorylated on Ser46 and to bind Pin1 better than
the Pro72 counterpart.[9] Our work thus confirms a
widespread crucial role for Ser46 phosphorylation in governing p53's apoptotic
activity at all levels, by triggering the rapid mitochondrial response to acute cytotoxic
stress, as well as enabling the subsequent transcriptional activation of apoptotic target
genes upon prolonged death-inducing stimuli. However, it is conceivable that in addition
to HIPK2, other cytoplasmic pro-apoptotic kinases triggering p53 Ser46 phosphorylation
(e.g., PKC-δ) could similarly induce, through Pin1, the localization of p53
at mitochondria.[10, 39]Of note, we have recently found that HIPK2 engages p53 to induce the death of neurons
expressing mutant forms of the protein Huntingtin.[10] In light of the results presented here, a possible contribution of
p53 transcription-independent apoptosis to neuronal death in Huntington's disease
could be envisaged.The finding that a common set of stress-responsive factors (i.e., HIPK2 and Pin1) governs
both the transcription-independent and -dependent arms of p53's apoptotic program
emphasizes the cooperative nature of these phases in fully executing the cellular response
to stress stimuli. It can be envisioned that following a first wave of direct
mitochondrial permeabilization induced by the HIPK2/Pin1/p53 pathway, prolonged
signaling along the same axis reaches the threshold for activating p53 target genes, thus
amplifying the response through a full apoptotic program (Figure
6).
Figure 6
Model for regulation of both transcription-dependent and -independent apoptotic
activity of p53 by Pin1. Treatment with either chemotherapeutic drugs or RITA leads to
stabilization of the apoptotic kinase HIPK2 and consequent phosphorylation of p53 on
Ser46. Subsequent prolyl-isomerization by Pin1 then leads to decreased
polyubiquitination of p53 in favor of its monoubiquitination, with consequent
relocalization of cytosolic p53 to mitochondria and induction of MOMP and direct
apoptosis. On the other hand, Pin1-mediated isomerization of the Ser46-Pro47 site
unlocks p53 from the apoptosis inhibitor iASPP, leading to induction of apoptotic target
genes and establishment of a full apoptotic response
This said, not all cell types are equally prone to undergo transcription-independent
apoptosis. In vivo, radiation-sensitive tissues respond to DNA-damaging
treatments with mitochondrial localization of p53 and rapid apoptosis, whereas
radio-resistant tissues fail to undergo these processes.[4] Moreover, Pin1 appears to be required for p53-dependent apoptosis
in some tissues, whereas not in others. It would be interesting to explore the basis of
this tissue specificity, possibly related to different kinases phosphorylating p53.Besides its activity in a normal context, we have demonstrated that Pin1 is a crucial
determinant for the sensitivity of oncogene-transformed cells to the p53- and
HIPK2-activating drug RITA. We have observed that in tumor-derived cell lines, RITA
induces mitochondrial accumulation of p53 and transcription-independent apoptosis. This is
in line with studies where inhibition of p53's mitochondrial activity by
pifithrin-μ[19] was able to reduce
RITA's cytotoxic effects in cancer cell lines.[40, 41] On the basis of our observations
that this process requires Pin1, one may anticipate that tumors displaying high levels of
Pin1 might be more sensitive to RITA-dependent cytotoxicity, thus increasing the chances
of selectively targeting cancer cells and minimizing undesired side effects. Of note, also
the p53-activating molecule Nutlin has been shown to mainly induce p53-mediated
transcription-independent apoptosis.[7] It would be
of interest to evaluate the role of Pin1 in this pathway, given that Ser46 phosphorylation
appears to be a common requirement for the cytotoxic action of both Nutlin and RITA in
cancer cells.[42]As a consequence of its enzymatic nature, Pin1's function is strongly influenced by
the cellular context and it may therefore support the function of either tumor suppressors
or oncogenic substrates. We have recently reported that in cancer cells, Pin1 acts to
fully unleash the oncogenic potential of mutant p53.[30, 43] Remarkably, RITA has been shown
to confer transcription-independent apoptotic activity at least to some p53 mutant
proteins,[40] and also it might therefore
prove effective in treatment of tumors bearing mutant p53 and high levels of Pin1.Finally, besides its death-inducing potential, p53 localization at mitochondria may have
broader tumor suppressive roles, related to inhibition of autophagy[44] and tumor cell survival, as well as to metabolism
control.[45] Exploring the implications of the
mitochondrial connection between p53 and Pin1 has therefore the potential to disclose
further complexity.
Materials and Methods
Cell lines and treatments
Human colon carcinoma HCT116 p53+/+ and
p53−/− and p53-null H1299 non-small cell lung carcinoma
cell lines were maintained in DMEM or RPMI (H1299) with 10% FCS. MCF10A and
MCF10A-HRasV12 were maintained in DMEM/F12 Ham's (Sigma-Aldrich,
St. Louis, MO, USA) 1 : 1, supplemented with 5% horse serum (Gibco,
Life Technologies, Darmstadt, Germany), insulin (10 μg/ml;
Sigma-Aldrich), hydrocortisone (0.5 μg/ml) and EGF
(20 ng ml–1; Peprotech, Rocky Hill, NJ, USA).
α-amanitin (Sigma-Aldrich), MG132 (Sigma-Aldrich), doxorubicin (Ebewe
Pharma, Holzkirchen, Germany), etoposide (Sigma-Aldrich), RITA (Cayman, Ann Arbor, MI,
USA), Ubiquitin Aldehyde (Enzo Life Biosciences, Vinci, Italy) were used at the
concentrations indicated in the text.
Transfection and retroviral transduction
Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen, Life Technologies, Darmstadt, Germany) was used for DNA
transfection; for RNAi, double-stranded RNA oligonucleotides
(10 pmol/cm2) were transfected using Lipofectamine RNAiMax
(Invitrogen) according to the manufacturer's instructions.Oligonucleotide sequences are reported below:Retroviruses were made by calcium phosphate transfection of 293-GP packaging cells with
the appropriate plasmids in combination with pMD2ENV coding for envelope proteins, and
harvested 48 h later. Infected cells were selected with puromycin or blasticidin
2 mg/ml.
Expression plasmids
pcDNA3-Pin1, pcDNA3-Pin1-HA, pGEX-Pin1WW, pcDNA3-p53 WT, pcDNA3-p53-M and
pcDNA3p53-S46A have been previously described.[8,
10] pcDNA3-p53NLS was generated by subcloning
from pCMV BamNeo-p53NLS.[3] pcDNA3-p53NLS-M
mutant was generated by PCR-directed mutagenesis. pLPC-Pin1-HA was generated by
subcloning. HA-Ubiquitin expression vector was provided by PP DiFiore (IFOM, Milan,
Italy). pCMV-Flag-HIPK2 WT, pEGFP-HIPK2 WT and pCMV-Flag-K221R was provided by S. Soddu
(IRE Rome, Italy). pLPC-HRASV12 was provided by M. Serrano (CNIO, Madrid,
Spain). pMSCV-HA Pin1SR and pMSCV-HA Pin1SR-S67E were generated introducing silent
mutations in the region targeted by Pin1 siRNA by site-directed mutagenesis of
pcDNA3-HAPin1 or pcDNA3-HAPin1S67E, and then subcloning in pMSCV vector.
Apoptosis and viability assays
Apoptosis was determined by cytofluorimetry using the Annexin V-FICT apoptosis
detection kit (Sigma-Aldrich). For propidium iodide (PI) staining, cells were
permeabilized with 0.1% NP40 in PBS and 2 μg/ml RNaseA,
and treated with 10 μg/ml PI before analysis by flow cytometry.
At least 1.5 × 104 cells were analyzed in each acquisition and the
percentage of cells with DNA content <2n was calculated. TUNEL assays were performed
with TMR Red in situ Cell Death Detection Kit (Roche, Nutley, NJ, USA)
following manufacturer's instructions. For viability assays, cells placed in
96-well plates (3000 cells per well) and treated with indicated compounds were
incubated with WST-1 reagent (Roche) and further analyzed according to the
manufacturer's instructions.
The cells were grown on coverslips and transfected with an aequorin chimera targeted to
the mitochondrial matrix (mtAEQ). After 1–2 h of incubation with
5 μM coelenterazine, the coverslips were transferred to the
perfusion chamber.All aequorin measurements were carried out in KRB (Krebs-Ringer modified buffer:
125 mM NaCl, 5 mM KCl, 1 mM Na3PO4,
1 mM MgSO4, 5.5 mM glucose, 20 mM HEPES, pH 7.4,
37 °C) supplemented with 1 mM CaCl2. Agonists were added to
the same medium. The experiments were terminated by lysing the cells with
100 μM digitonin in a hypotonic Ca2+-rich solution
(10 mM CaCl2 in H2O), thus discharging the remaining
aequorin pool. The light signal was collected and calibrated into
[Ca2+] values by an algorithm based on the
Ca2+ response curve of aequorin at physiological conditions of pH,
[Mg2+] and ionic strength, as previously
described.[16] Representative traces are
shown in the figures, whereas the full data set is included in the legends.
In vitro binding, immunoprecipitation and western blotting
Western blot (WB) analysis, immunoprecipitations and GST pull-down assays were
performed as previously described.[8] For
ubiquitination assays, cells were lysed in 2% SDS, 150 mM NaCl,
10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0, 1 mM PMSF, 5 mM NaF, 1 mM
Na3VO4, 0,5% (v/v) sodium deoxycholate with protease
inhibitor cocktail (Sigma-Aldrich) and Ubiquitin Aldeyde 50 ng/ml. Cell
lysates were diluted in IP buffer: 10 mM Tris-HCl, pH8.0, 150 mM NaCl,
2 mM EDTA, 1% Triton. Anti-p53 393FL (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa
Cruz, CA, USA) antibody was covalently bound to protein G Sepharose (Amersham
Biosciences, GE Healthcare, Munich, Germany) using 5 mg/ml
dimethylpimelimidate (Pierce Biosciences, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Bonn, Germany).
Other antibodies were anti-p53 DO-1 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology), monoclonal anti-Pin1
(G8, Santa Cruz Biotechnology) and polyclonal anti-Pin1,[8] anti-PARP p85 (Promega, Mannheim, Germany), anti-Porin VDAC
(31HL, Calbiochem, Merck, Darmstadt, Germany), anti-lamin B1 (ABI6048), anti-PCNA
(FL-261, Santa Cruz Biotechnology), polyclonal anti-actin (C11, Sigma-Aldrich),
anti-p53pS46 (Cell Signaling), anti-HA 12CA5, anti-cleaved-caspase 3 (Cell Signaling,
Danvers, MA, USA). Anti-HIPK2 antibody was kindly provided by T Hoffman (DKFZ,
Heidelberg, Germany). For WB, equal protein amounts of mitochondrial and crude cell
lysates were loaded. In cases where WBs were normalized for equal p53 loading, a first
quantitation WB was run.
Mitochondria purification
Mitochondria were isolated by differential centrifugation, using Mitochondria
Fractionation Kit (Pierce Biosciences). Mitochondrial purity was verified by WB for
absence of nuclear (PCNA or Lamin B) contamination; equal mitochondrial loading was
verified by WB for the mitochondrial resident porin VDAC. Quantification of relative
mitochondrial localization was performed by densitometry analysis of WBs using the
ImageJ analysis tool. Absolute intensity (AI) for each experimental p53 band and
corresponding control band was obtained, and relative intensity was calculated by
normalizing the experimental AI to the corresponding control AI. Mitochondrial p53 band
was normalized both for mitochondrial extraction (mitochondrial VDAC band) and for
transfection efficiency.Immunofluorescence staining was performed as previously described.[32] Briefly, cells were fixed in 4%
paraformaldehyde for 20 min, washed in PBS, and blocked in PBS and BSA 10%
for 30 min. Antigen recognition was done by incubating with anti-p53 DO1 as
primary antibody for 1 h at 37 °C and with anti-mouse Alexa Fluor 594
as secondary antibody for 30 min a 37 °C.
Colocalization analysis
Colocalization between mt-GFP and p53 NLS (nuclear localization signal) proteins was
calculated using ImageJ (rsb.info.nih.gov/ij) with the plug-in: Manders' Coefficients.
Colocalization was expressed as the Pearson's correlation coefficient. For each
condition, 20 single-cell images were collected by using confocal microscope Zeiss LSM
510 (Zeiss, Göttingen, Germany) and processed for colocalization analysis.
In vitro transcription and translation and in vitro
isomerization
In vitro transcription and translation of MBP and MBP-p53 proteins was
performed by using the TNT transcription-translation system (Promega) following the
manufacturer's instructions. In vitro isomerization was performed by
incubating purified MBP-p53 proteins with 200 ng of either GST–Pin1WT,
GST–WW or GST in the following buffer: 50 mM HEPES, pH7.5, 100 mM
NaCl, 1 mM MgCl2, 1 mM dithiothreitol, supplemented with phosphatase
inhibitors, for 20 min at room temperature.
Mice strains and mitochondria purification from mouse tissues
Pin1 KO mice in C57Bl background[46] were
provided by A. Means (Duke University, Durham, NC, USA). Genotyping was performed by PCR
on tail DNA as described.[46] Mice were injected
IP with a single dose of either doxorubicin at 20 mg/kg or the same volume of
saline as a control. Mice were killed after 3 h, and heart tissues were
subsequently collected and processed for subcellular fractionation as
described.[47]For irradiation, mice were subjected to whole-body γIR with
10 Gy. Mice were killed 3 h after the treatment, and organs were
immediately harvested and processed for WB.
Authors: Natalia Issaeva; Przemyslaw Bozko; Martin Enge; Marina Protopopova; Lisette G G C Verhoef; Maria Masucci; Aladdin Pramanik; Galina Selivanova Journal: Nat Med Date: 2004-11-21 Impact factor: 53.440
Authors: Alice Grison; Fiamma Mantovani; Anna Comel; Elena Agostoni; Stefano Gustincich; Francesca Persichetti; Giannino Del Sal Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2011-10-19 Impact factor: 11.205