Literature DB >> 22933891

Attitudes of midwifery students towards teaching breast-self examination.

Andrej Plesnicar1, Martina Golicnik, Irena Kirar Fazarinc, Bozo Kralj, Viljem Kovac, Blanka Kores Plesnicar.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to asses the attitude of undergraduate midwifery students towards teaching other women in methods of breast self-examination (BSE). PARTICIPANTS AND METHODS.: The study was performed at the beginning and at the end of students' study at the Faculty of Health Sciences in Ljubljana, Slovenia. It was carried out during the academic year 2002/2003 and involved 28 first and 25 third year undergraduate midwifery students. The data were gathered from questionnaires and processed with the use of descriptive and inferential statistics.
RESULTS: All study participants were of the opinion that teaching other women in methods of BSE is of great importance for an early detection of breast cancer (BC) and that this task ought to be one of their duties. There were no significant differences between the two groups when the readiness to upgrade their own knowledge of BSE or when the optimism regarding the progress in breast cancer detection and therapy in the future were concerned.
CONCLUSIONS: The readiness of midwifery students to pass the knowledge of BSE to other women could help to increase their breast health awareness and thus improve their willingness and ability to detect early changes, associated with BC.

Entities:  

Keywords:  breast cancer, teaching breast self-examination; breast health awareness; midwifery students; specific education

Year:  2010        PMID: 22933891      PMCID: PMC3423671          DOI: 10.2478/v10019-010-0009-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiol Oncol        ISSN: 1318-2099            Impact factor:   2.991


Introduction

Breast cancer is the most common form of cancer and the cause of death from cancer in women in Slovenia (population two million), where it was diagnosed in 1112 women in the year 2006 and has shown a fivefold increase in its incidence in the last five decades.1–3 Breast cancer incidence may be low in less developed countries, but survival rates of those suffering from this disease are also low, thus making it an important health care problem all over the world.4,5 The efficacy of BC screening with mammography has been confirmed in a number of randomized and observation studies.6,7 However, small palpable tumours can also be detected with the clinical breast examination (CBE), performed in clinical surroundings, and with BSE, which can be done by properly trained women themselves.6–8 Despite many controversies, it has been accepted that BSE increases the awareness of normal appearance and structure of breasts and the consequent ability to detect subtle changes that don’t correspond to the normal features of healthy breasts. Breast health awareness may, therefore, increase the ability of women to find small palpable tumours early, leading them to consult their physician immediately after discovering undue changes in their breasts.6,9,10 Unfortunately, few women perform BSE and there is little information on the attitude of individual women and specific groups of women towards this way of breast change detection.3,6 In this study, we, thus, assessed the attitude of midwifery students towards the teaching other women in methods of BSE. We also assessed how the specific education of midwifery students, gained during the course of their three year study, affects their attitude towards BSE. Finally, we examined their attitude towards the progress in BC detection and treatment in the future.

Participants and methods

Twenty eight first year and 25 third year midwifery students were included in the study carried out in the academic year 2002/2003 at the Faculty of Health Sciences in Ljubljana, Slovenia. There were no males among the midwifery students in both study groups in that academic year. The part of the study involving the first-year students was carried out at the end of their first term and the part involving third-year students at the end of their sixth term. A written consent was obtained from all the involved participants before enrolling them in the study and all were asked to complete the questionnaires with data about their personal characteristics. Questionnaires also included five statements concerning their attitudes whether teaching other women in methods of BSE helps in BC detection, whether teaching other women about BSE ought to be one of their duties, about their attitude regarding additional BSE training and the form of such training. Finally, they were asked to express their attitude about the development and successfulness of the BC treatment in the future. The acquired data were sorted and analyzed with the help of Microsoft Excel 97 and SPSS 11.0 for Windows programs. Most answers were assessed with the use of Chi-square test for 2X2 contingency tables with which the differences in frequencies were verified. The results were considered as statistically significant if p<0.05.11

Results

The mean age of the first-year midwifery students in the study was 19.86 ± 1.18 (SD) years (range 18–23 years), the mean age of the third-year students was 21.76 ± 2.26 (SD) years (range 20–32 years). None of them had undergone a mammography or ultrasound breast examination prior to participating in the study. All the participants, regardless of the year of study, were of the opinion that teaching BSE to other women helps in the early detection of BC. All were of the opinion that teaching and informing women of the advantages and disadvantages of BSE ought to be one of their duties. Most of the participants from both groups would be willing to receive additional training in how to perform BSE. The number of the participants willing to receive this training was slightly smaller in the group of the third-year students, but the difference was not statistically significant. In the group of the first-year students more participants were in favour of practical BSE lessons given live by experts and demonstrators as compared to a brochure on BSE obtained by mail (Table 1). The majority of the participants from both groups were optimistic in their opinion regarding the progress in the development and successfulness of the BC detection and the treatment in the future. The number of participants holding such opinion was slightly larger in the group of the third-year students, the difference between both groups was not statistically significant (Table 1).
TABLE 1

The attitudes of midwifery students (Faculty of Health Sciences, Ljubljana, Slovenia, academic year 2002/2003) towards teaching BSE, receiving additional BSE education and breast towards BC detection and treatment in the future

1. year (n = 28)3. year (n = 25)Chi-squarep-value
Teaching BSE helps early BC detectionYes28 (100%)25 (100%)//
No0 (0%)0 (0%)
Teaching BSE should be one of midwives’ dutiesYes28 (100%)25 (100%)//
No0 (0%)0 (0%)
I am willing to receive further BSE educationYes26 (92.86%)22 (88%)0.3620.5469
No2 (7.14%)3 (12%)
I favour practical demonstration of BSEYes22 (78.56%)16 (64%)0.93270.3341
No6 (21.44%)9 (36%)
I am optimistic about BC detection and treatment in the futureYes24 (85.71%)23 (92%)0.53110.4664
No4 (14.29%)2 (8%)

n = number; BSE = breast self-examination; BC = breast cancer

Discussion

In this study, we found that midwifery students could be regarded as having a positive attitude towards teaching other women in methods of BSE. They were of opinion that this type of teaching helps in the BC detection and that it ought to be one of their duties. Most of the participants were also willing to receive the additional training in BSE themselves. The opinion that they should play an active part in educating other women and that they should additionally educate themselves probably makes them optimistic in their views of the development and successfulness of the BC detection and the treatment in the future. A favourable attitude of midwifery students towards BSE may come from an inherent motivation to become involved in problems associated with BC and from the specific education they gain during the course of their study. This knowledge makes them more informed than other women5,12–18, giving them a profound insight into the anatomy, histology and physiology of healthy breasts, as well as into the significance of the incidence, mortality and pathogenic characteristics of BC.19 Midwifery students are at the end of their study in possession of an important amount of information about BC and know that it is an important public health problem. In this context, it is safe to conclude that their specific education is of utmost importance. A special emphasis should be given to the attitude of all the participants in the study that BSE is important in the early detection of BC. All of them would fully participate in teaching other women about BSE that certainly must include its advantages and disadvantages.6,15 Their willingness to teach BSE should receive the additional support by giving the results of the studies investigating BSE some further consideration. According to some of the studies, BSE does not decrease the mortality caused by BC.20–22 However, the results of one of such studies also show that the compliance of one of the study groups to BSE program (BSE every month or every two months) helped to achieve a higher rate of 15 year survival.22 Some of the studies also show that BSE reduces the size of newly discovered primary breast tumours20,23,24, which may lead to a prompter use of modern diagnostic procedures and enables carrying out more conservative surgical procedures.10,25 Even when examining the negative results from some of these studies, a careful consideration should be given to local cultural values, level of readiness of participants to perform BSE and the likelihood that all of them were properly informed about BC issues.20,26–29 Despite some of the doubts mentioned above, the possibility that BSE is used for achieving the increased breast health awareness in women should be examined carefully.6,30–32 The breast health awareness means accepting health responsibilities to a greater extent by being able to recognize a normal appearance and structure of breasts during different cycle periods and with regard to age, by being able to recognize undue changes and to inform the physician immediately.6,23,30,31,33 If the breast health awareness in women is to increase, the easiest way to achieve this would probably be by teaching them how to perform BSE. In some opinions the breast health awareness should take the role of BSE30, with BSE itself being not much different from what the concept of the breast health awareness includes.23,34 The majority of midwifery students in our study were willing to receive the additional education in relation to BSE. Most of them favoured the practical demonstration of the BSE procedures. A smaller interest in the additional training and practical demonstrations is understandable with the students finishing their study and, on the other hand, this smaller interest again proves the importance of knowledge gained during the study of midwifery.19 A slightly bigger number of those who hold an optimistic view of the future of the BC treatment in the group of the third-year students probably also points to the importance of this knowledge.18,35,36 In this study we found that female midwifery students included in the study have a favourable attitude towards teaching BSE, although it is undoubtedly hard to learn and teach.37–39 All considered BSE to be of great importance for an early breast cancer detection and all were willing to teach it to other women, including those with previously treated malignant disease.40 As a consequence of their attitude towards BSE and specific contents of their study, midwifery students could towards the end of their study probably also perform CBE quite efficiently and relieve other women of difficult endeavour of learning all the steps of the appropriate and effective BSE.41,42 In Slovenia and elsewhere, this application of their knowledge would be especially important when younger women are in question, because in their cases mammography screening is not so efficient.9,23 On the other hand, the participants in this study could, due to their knowledge and other characteristics, represent a specific group continuing with quality and regular BSE. Their attitude towards and knowledge of BSE could, in due course, be evaluated again. However, in some of the less developed parts of the world, the knowledge of BSE could enable similarly educated midwives to have an important impact on the early detection of breast cancer and, along with other nurses, an important role in health promotion, prevention and education activities associated with breast cancer.43,44 In conclusion, in this study we show that midwifery students, a highly motivated and specifically educated group, are ready to pass the knowledge of BSE to other women, to receive the further BSE education themselves and are generally optimistic about the BC detection and the treatment in the future. In this way, they could have an important role in increasing the breast health awareness of other women and thus improve their willingness and ability to detect early changes associated with BC.
  34 in total

1.  Effect of breast self-examination techniques on the risk of death from breast cancer.

Authors:  B J Harvey; A B Miller; C J Baines; P N Corey
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1997-11-01       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  The natural history of breast carcinoma: what have we learned from screening?

Authors:  L Tabár; S W Duffy; B Vitak; H H Chen; T C Prevost
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1999-08-01       Impact factor: 6.860

3.  The effect of mass screening by physical examination combined with regular breast self-examination on clinical stage and course of Japanese women with breast cancer.

Authors:  Y Koibuchi; Y Iino; H Takei; M Maemura; J Horiguchi; T Yokoe; Y Morishita
Journal:  Oncol Rep       Date:  1998 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.906

4.  Estimates of the worldwide mortality from eighteen major cancers in 1985. Implications for prevention and projections of future burden.

Authors:  P Pisani; D M Parkin; J Ferlay
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  1993-12-02       Impact factor: 7.396

5.  Preliminary results of the Nottingham breast self-examination education programme.

Authors:  C S Dowle; A Mitchell; C W Elston; E J Roebuck; C P Hinton; H Holliday; R W Blamey
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1987-03       Impact factor: 6.939

6.  The role of breast self-examination in early breast cancer detection (results of the 5-years USSR/WHO randomized study in Leningrad).

Authors:  V F Semiglazov; V M Moiseyenko; J L Bavli; N Sh Migmanova; N K Seleznyov; R T Popova; O A Ivanova; A A Orlov; O A Chagunava; N J Barash
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 8.082

7.  Improving clinical breast examination training in a medical school: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  C Pilgrim; C Lannon; R P Harris; W Cogburn; S W Fletcher
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 5.128

8.  Improving physicians' and nurses' clinical breast examination: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  H S Campbell; S W Fletcher; C A Pilgrim; T M Morgan; S Lin
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  1991 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.043

9.  Clinical measures to assess the practice and efficiency of breast self-examination.

Authors:  J Philip; W G Harris; C Flaherty; C A Joslin
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1986-08-15       Impact factor: 6.860

10.  Breast self-examination: clinical results from a population-based prospective study.

Authors:  J Philip; W G Harris; C Flaherty; C A Joslin; J H Rustage; D P Wijesinghe
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1984-07       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  8 in total

Review 1.  Current Status and Future Projections of Breast Cancer in Asia.

Authors:  Lei Fan; Paul E Goss; Kathrin Strasser-Weippl
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2015-12-15       Impact factor: 2.860

2.  Recurrent invasive lobular carcinoma presenting as a ruptured breast implant.

Authors:  Maikel Botros; Kenneth Chang; Robert Miller; Sunil Krishnan; Matthew Iott
Journal:  Radiol Oncol       Date:  2011-10-08       Impact factor: 2.991

3.  Triple negative breast cancer - prognostic factors and survival.

Authors:  Tanja Ovcaricek; Snjezana Grazio Frkovic; Erika Matos; Barbara Mozina; Simona Borstnar
Journal:  Radiol Oncol       Date:  2010-12-31       Impact factor: 2.991

4.  Chemotherapy increases caspase-cleaved cytokeratin 18 in the serum of breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Engin Ulukaya; Esra Karaagac; Ferda Ari; Arzu Y Oral; Saduman B Adim; Asuman H Tokullugil; Türkkan Evrensel
Journal:  Radiol Oncol       Date:  2011-03-15       Impact factor: 2.991

5.  5-HTTLPR polymorphism and anxious preoccupation in early breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Giulia Schillani; Daniel Era; Tania Cristante; Giorgio Mustacchi; Martina Richiardi; Luigi Grassi; Tullio Giraldi
Journal:  Radiol Oncol       Date:  2012-11-09       Impact factor: 2.991

6.  Mammographycally occult high grade ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) as second primary breast cancer, detected with MRI: a case report.

Authors:  Marta Zebic-Sinkovec; Maksimiljan Kadivec; Gasper Podobnik; Erik Skof; Marko Snoj
Journal:  Radiol Oncol       Date:  2010-08-09       Impact factor: 2.991

7.  Breast cancer awareness among women in Eastern China: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Li-Yuan Liu; Fei Wang; Li-Xiang Yu; Zhong-Bing Ma; Qiang Zhang; De-Zong Gao; Yu-Yang Li; Liang Li; Zhong-Tang Zhao; Zhi-Gang Yu
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2014-09-26       Impact factor: 3.295

8.  Factors associated with insufficient awareness of breast cancer among women in Northern and Eastern China: a case-control study.

Authors:  Li-Yuan Liu; Yong-Jiu Wang; Fei Wang; Li-Xiang Yu; Yu-Juan Xiang; Fei Zhou; Liang Li; Qiang Zhang; Qin-Ye Fu; Zhong-Bing Ma; De-Zong Gao; Yu-Yang Li; Zhi-Gang Yu
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-02-20       Impact factor: 2.692

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.