Literature DB >> 1867894

Improving physicians' and nurses' clinical breast examination: a randomized controlled trial.

H S Campbell1, S W Fletcher, C A Pilgrim, T M Morgan, S Lin.   

Abstract

Health professionals' clinical breast examination accuracy and skills are not optimal. We conducted a randomized trial to evaluate changes in physicians' and nurses' lump detection accuracy and examination skills after a training program emphasizing development of tactile skills and using silicone breast models containing lumps of varying sizes, degrees of hardness, and depth of placement. Sensitivity, specificity, and examination technique were measured before and four months after training in 43 experimental group and 46 control group participants. Mean sensitivity increased from 57% to 63% in the experimental group but decreased from 57% to 56% in the control group (P less than or equal to .05). The experimental group's posttest sensitivity was better for each lump characteristic, with statistically significant improvement for the very small (0.3 cm) and medium hard lumps. Duration of examination independently predicted sensitivity. Specificity decreased from 56% to 41% in the experimental group while it increased from 56% to 68% in the control group (P less than or equal to .05). Physicians had significantly higher mean sensitivity than nurses overall, as well as for the larger (1.0 cm), very small (0.3 cm), and softer lumps, but significantly lower mean specificity (33% versus 57%, P = .03). The experimental group improved significantly in five of six technique components while the control group improved in only one. To determine the effect of training on specificity in the clinical setting, we examined medical records of women seen by a subset of experimental and control physicians during the six months following training. There were no significant differences in the proportion of abnormal breast examinations reported or the number of mammograms ordered by experimental and control physicians. Our results show health professionals can be taught successfully to improve their clinical breast examination accuracy and skills.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1867894

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Prev Med        ISSN: 0749-3797            Impact factor:   5.043


  12 in total

1.  Making behavioral technology transferable.

Authors:  H S Pennypacker; L L Hench
Journal:  Behav Anal       Date:  1997

2.  Detection and description of small breast masses by residents trained using a standardized clinical breast exam curriculum.

Authors:  Elizabeth Steiner; Donald F Austin; Nancy C Prouser
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2007-12-04       Impact factor: 5.128

3.  Lump detection is enhanced in silicone breast models simulating postmenopausal breast tissue.

Authors:  M M McDermott; N C Dolan; J Huang; D Reifler; A W Rademaker
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 5.128

4.  Evaluating the feasibility of a novel Marking Breast Oncoplastic Surgery Simulator (MBOSS) as a training tool for marking: a randomised trial.

Authors:  Geok Hoon Lim; Xue Wang; John C Allen; Ruey Pyng Ng; Bien Keem Tan; Stephen McCulley; Heow Pueh Lee
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2020-10

Review 5.  Screening for breast cancer.

Authors:  Joann G Elmore; Katrina Armstrong; Constance D Lehman; Suzanne W Fletcher
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2005-03-09       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 6.  Continuing education meetings and workshops: effects on professional practice and health care outcomes.

Authors:  Louise Forsetlund; Arild Bjørndal; Arash Rashidian; Gro Jamtvedt; Mary Ann O'Brien; Fredric Wolf; Dave Davis; Jan Odgaard-Jensen; Andrew D Oxman
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2009-04-15

7.  Improving clinical breast examination training in a medical school: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  C Pilgrim; C Lannon; R P Harris; W Cogburn; S W Fletcher
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 5.128

8.  Characterizing the range of simulated prostate abnormalities palpable by digital rectal examination.

Authors:  Leigh A Baumgart; Gregory J Gerling; Ellen J Bass
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol       Date:  2010-01-12       Impact factor: 2.984

9.  Diagnostic Accuracy of Breast Medical Tactile Examiners (MTEs): A Prospective Pilot Study.

Authors:  Michael P Lux; Julius Emons; Mayada R Bani; Marius Wunderle; Charlotte Sell; Caroline Preuss; Claudia Rauh; Sebastian M Jud; Felix Heindl; Hanna Langemann; Thomas Geyer; Anna-Lisa Brandl; Carolin C Hack; Werner Adler; Rüdiger Schulz-Wendtland; Matthias W Beckmann; Peter A Fasching; Paul Gass
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2019-01-30       Impact factor: 2.860

10.  Attitudes of midwifery students towards teaching breast-self examination.

Authors:  Andrej Plesnicar; Martina Golicnik; Irena Kirar Fazarinc; Bozo Kralj; Viljem Kovac; Blanka Kores Plesnicar
Journal:  Radiol Oncol       Date:  2010-03-18       Impact factor: 2.991

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.