Literature DB >> 22933340

CAD-score: a new contact area difference-based function for evaluation of protein structural models.

Kliment Olechnovič1, Eleonora Kulberkytė, Ceslovas Venclovas.   

Abstract

Evaluation of protein models against the native structure is essential for the development and benchmarking of protein structure prediction methods. Although a number of evaluation scores have been proposed to date, many aspects of model assessment still lack desired robustness. In this study we present CAD-score, a new evaluation function quantifying differences between physical contacts in a model and the reference structure. The new score uses the concept of residue-residue contact area difference (CAD) introduced by Abagyan and Totrov (J Mol Biol 1997; 268:678-685). Contact areas, the underlying basis of the score, are derived using the Voronoi tessellation of protein structure. The newly introduced CAD-score is a continuous function, confined within fixed limits, free of any arbitrary thresholds or parameters. The built-in logic for treatment of missing residues allows consistent ranking of models of any degree of completeness. We tested CAD-score on a large set of diverse models and compared it to GDT-TS, a widely accepted measure of model accuracy. Similarly to GDT-TS, CAD-score showed a robust performance on single-domain proteins, but displayed a stronger preference for physically more realistic models. Unlike GDT-TS, the new score revealed a balanced assessment of domain rearrangement, removing the necessity for different treatment of single-domain, multi-domain, and multi-subunit structures. Moreover, CAD-score makes it possible to assess the accuracy of inter-domain or inter-subunit interfaces directly. In addition, the approach offers an alternative to the superposition-based model clustering. The CAD-score implementation is available both as a web server and a standalone software package at http://www.ibt.lt/bioinformatics/cad-score/.
Copyright © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22933340     DOI: 10.1002/prot.24172

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proteins        ISSN: 0887-3585


  49 in total

1.  Structure alignment of membrane proteins: Accuracy of available tools and a consensus strategy.

Authors:  Marcus Stamm; Lucy R Forrest
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2015-08-01

2.  Comparative analysis of methods for evaluation of protein models against native structures.

Authors:  Kliment Olechnovič; Bohdan Monastyrskyy; Andriy Kryshtafovych; Česlovas Venclovas
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2019-03-15       Impact factor: 6.937

3.  Continuous Automated Model EvaluatiOn (CAMEO) complementing the critical assessment of structure prediction in CASP12.

Authors:  Jürgen Haas; Alessandro Barbato; Dario Behringer; Gabriel Studer; Steven Roth; Martino Bertoni; Khaled Mostaguir; Rafal Gumienny; Torsten Schwede
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2017-12-17

4.  LAGUERRE-INTERSECTION METHOD FOR IMPLICIT SOLVATION.

Authors:  Michelle Hatch Hummel; Bihua Yu; Carlos Simmerling; Evangelos A Coutsias
Journal:  Int J Comput Geom Appl       Date:  2018-03-29

5.  High-accuracy protein structures by combining machine-learning with physics-based refinement.

Authors:  Lim Heo; Michael Feig
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2019-11-15

6.  Assessment of model accuracy estimations in CASP12.

Authors:  Andriy Kryshtafovych; Bohdan Monastyrskyy; Krzysztof Fidelis; Torsten Schwede; Anna Tramontano
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2017-09-08

7.  Construction of a novel lipolytic fusion biocatalyst GDEst-lip for industrial application.

Authors:  Renata Gudiukaite; Mikas Sadauskas; Audrius Gegeckas; Vilius Malunavicius; Donaldas Citavicius
Journal:  J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2017-01-19       Impact factor: 3.346

8.  Challenging the state of the art in protein structure prediction: Highlights of experimental target structures for the 10th Critical Assessment of Techniques for Protein Structure Prediction Experiment CASP10.

Authors:  Andriy Kryshtafovych; John Moult; Patrick Bales; J Fernando Bazan; Marco Biasini; Alex Burgin; Chen Chen; Frank V Cochran; Timothy K Craig; Rhiju Das; Deborah Fass; Carmela Garcia-Doval; Osnat Herzberg; Donald Lorimer; Hartmut Luecke; Xiaolei Ma; Daniel C Nelson; Mark J van Raaij; Forest Rohwer; Anca Segall; Victor Seguritan; Kornelius Zeth; Torsten Schwede
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2014-02

9.  CASP11 statistics and the prediction center evaluation system.

Authors:  Andriy Kryshtafovych; Bohdan Monastyrskyy; Krzysztof Fidelis
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2016-03-09

10.  Influence of N- and/or C-terminal regions on activity, expression, characteristics and structure of lipase from Geobacillus sp. 95.

Authors:  Renata Gudiukaitė; Audrius Gegeckas; Darius Kazlauskas; Donaldas Citavicius
Journal:  Extremophiles       Date:  2013-11-28       Impact factor: 2.395

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.