BACKGROUND: The usage of a drain following evacuation of a chronic subdural haematoma (CSDH) is known to reduce recurrence. In this study we aim to compare the clinical outcomes and recurrence rate of utilising two different types of drains (subperiosteal and subdural drain) following drainage of a CSDH. METHODS: Prospective randomised single-centre study analysing 50 patients who underwent CSDH treatment. Two types of drains, subperiosteal (SPD) and subdural (SDD), were utilised on consecutive alternate patients following burr-hole craniostomy, with a total of 25 patients in each group. The drains were left in for 48-h duration and then removed. The modified Rankin Scale (mRS) was used for outcome measurement at 3 and 6 months. RESULTS: Data analysis was performed by unpaired t test with Welch's correction. It was observed that none of the patients in either group had haematoma recurrence during a 6-month follow-up, and a significant difference in outcome was noted at 6 months (p = 0.0118) more than at 3 months (p = 0.0493) according to the statistical analysis. Postoperative seizure and inadvertent placement of the subdural drain into the brain parenchyma were the two complications noted in this study. Anticoagulant use prior to the surgery did not affect the outcome in either group. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude there was no recurrence of CSDH utilising the SDD and SPD following burr-hole craniostomy. The mRS measurement at the 6-month follow-up was found to be statistically significant, with better outcomes with utilisation of the SPD. The SPD may thus prove to be more beneficial than the SDD in the treatment of CSDH. A multi-centre study with a larger group of patients is recommended to reinforce the results from our study.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: The usage of a drain following evacuation of a chronic subdural haematoma (CSDH) is known to reduce recurrence. In this study we aim to compare the clinical outcomes and recurrence rate of utilising two different types of drains (subperiosteal and subdural drain) following drainage of a CSDH. METHODS: Prospective randomised single-centre study analysing 50 patients who underwent CSDH treatment. Two types of drains, subperiosteal (SPD) and subdural (SDD), were utilised on consecutive alternate patients following burr-hole craniostomy, with a total of 25 patients in each group. The drains were left in for 48-h duration and then removed. The modified Rankin Scale (mRS) was used for outcome measurement at 3 and 6 months. RESULTS: Data analysis was performed by unpaired t test with Welch's correction. It was observed that none of the patients in either group had haematoma recurrence during a 6-month follow-up, and a significant difference in outcome was noted at 6 months (p = 0.0118) more than at 3 months (p = 0.0493) according to the statistical analysis. Postoperative seizure and inadvertent placement of the subdural drain into the brain parenchyma were the two complications noted in this study. Anticoagulant use prior to the surgery did not affect the outcome in either group. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude there was no recurrence of CSDH utilising the SDD and SPD following burr-hole craniostomy. The mRS measurement at the 6-month follow-up was found to be statistically significant, with better outcomes with utilisation of the SPD. The SPD may thus prove to be more beneficial than the SDD in the treatment of CSDH. A multi-centre study with a larger group of patients is recommended to reinforce the results from our study.
Authors: Elena I Fomchenko; Emily J Gilmore; Charles C Matouk; Jason L Gerrard; Kevin N Sheth Journal: Curr Treat Options Neurol Date: 2018-07-18 Impact factor: 3.598
Authors: Laurence Johann Glancz; Michael Tin Chung Poon; Ian Craig Coulter; Peter John Hutchinson; Angelos Georgiou Kolias; Paul Martin Brennan Journal: Neurosurgery Date: 2019-10-01 Impact factor: 4.654
Authors: Laurence Johann Glancz; Michael Tin Chung Poon; Peter John Hutchinson; Angelos Georgiou Kolias; Paul Martin Brennan Journal: Acta Neurochir (Wien) Date: 2020-04-27 Impact factor: 2.216