Literature DB >> 22932787

Cochlear implantation in older adults.

Frank R Lin1, Wade W Chien, Lingsheng Li, Danisa M Clarrett, John K Niparko, Howard W Francis.   

Abstract

Cochlear implants allow individuals with severe to profound hearing loss access to sound and spoken language. The number of older adults in the United States who are potential candidates for cochlear implantation (CI) is approximately 150,000 and will continue to increase with the aging of the population. Should CI be routinely recommended for these older adults, and do these individuals benefit from CI? We reviewed our 12-year experience with CI in adults aged ≥60 years (n = 445) at Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions to investigate the impact of CI on speech understanding and to identify factors associated with speech performance. Complete data on speech outcomes at baseline and 1 year post-CI were available for 83 individuals. Our results demonstrate that CI in adults aged ≥60 years consistently improved speech understanding scores, with a mean increase of 60.0% (SD 24.1) on HINT (Hearing in Noise Test) sentences in quiet. The magnitude of the gain in speech scores was negatively associated with age at implantation, such that for every increasing year of age at CI the gain in speech scores was 1.3 percentage points less (95% confidence interval [95% CI], 0.6-1.9) after adjusting for age at hearing loss onset. Conversely, individuals with higher pre-CI speech scores (HINT scores between 40% and 60%) had significantly greater post-CI speech scores by a mean of 10.0 percentage points (95% CI, 0.4-19.6) than those with lower pre-CI speech scores (HINT <40%) after adjusting for age at CI and age at hearing loss onset. These results suggest that older adult CI candidates who are younger at implantation and with higher preoperative speech scores obtain the highest speech understanding scores after CI, with possible implications for current United States Medicare policy. Finally, we provide an extended discussion of the epidemiology and impact of hearing loss in older adults. Future research of CI in older adults should expand beyond simple speech outcomes to take into account the broad cognitive, social, and physical functioning outcomes that are likely detrimentally affected by hearing loss and may be mitigated by CI.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22932787      PMCID: PMC3518393          DOI: 10.1097/MD.0b013e31826b145a

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)        ISSN: 0025-7974            Impact factor:   1.889


  42 in total

1.  Is age a limiting factor for adaptation to cochlear implant?

Authors:  Anne-Lise Hiel; Jean-Marc Gerard; Monique Decat; Naïma Deggouj
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2015-12-16       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  Impact of Aging and Cognition on Hearing Assistive Technology Use.

Authors:  Lindsey E Jorgensen; Jessica J Messersmith
Journal:  Semin Hear       Date:  2015-08

3.  Long-term use of cochlear implants in older adults: results from a large consecutive case series.

Authors:  Janet S Choi; Kevin J Contrera; Joshua F Betz; Caitlin R Blake; John K Niparko; Frank R Lin
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 2.311

4.  Linguistic Context Versus Semantic Competition in Word Recognition by Younger and Older Adults With Cochlear Implants.

Authors:  Nicole M Amichetti; Eriko Atagi; Ying-Yee Kong; Arthur Wingfield
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2018 Jan/Feb       Impact factor: 3.570

Review 5.  Sensation and Psychiatry: Linking Age-Related Hearing Loss to Late-Life Depression and Cognitive Decline.

Authors:  Bret R Rutherford; Katharine Brewster; Justin S Golub; Ana H Kim; Steven P Roose
Journal:  Am J Psychiatry       Date:  2017-12-05       Impact factor: 18.112

6.  Cochlear Implantation in Neurobrucellosis.

Authors:  Münir Demir Bajin; Özden Savaş; Filiz Aslan; Levent Sennaroğlu
Journal:  Balkan Med J       Date:  2016-01-01       Impact factor: 2.021

7.  Prevalence of ototoxic medication use among older adults in Beaver Dam, Wisconsin.

Authors:  Yoonmee Joo; Karen J Cruickshanks; Barbara E K Klein; Ronald Klein; OiSaeng Hong; Margaret Wallhagen
Journal:  J Am Assoc Nurse Pract       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 1.165

8.  Age-Related Differences in the Processing of Temporal Envelope and Spectral Cues in a Speech Segment.

Authors:  Matthew J Goupell; Casey R Gaskins; Maureen J Shader; Erin P Walter; Samira Anderson; Sandra Gordon-Salant
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2017 Nov/Dec       Impact factor: 3.570

9.  Quality of life after intervention with a cochlear implant or hearing aid.

Authors:  Kevin J Contrera; Joshua Betz; Lingsheng Li; Caitlin R Blake; Yoon K Sung; Janet S Choi; Frank R Lin
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2016-01-17       Impact factor: 3.325

10.  Clinical and psychosocial risk factors of hearing outcome in older adults with cochlear implants.

Authors:  Howard W Francis; Jennifer A Yeagle; Carol B Thompson
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2014-09-12       Impact factor: 3.325

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.