Literature DB >> 22932742

Bone mineral density measurements of the proximal femur from routine contrast-enhanced MDCT data sets correlate with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry.

M Gruber1, J S Bauer, M Dobritz, A J Beer, P Wolf, K Woertler, E J Rummeny, T Baum.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the utility of femoral bone mineral density (BMD) measurements in routine contrast-enhanced multi-detector computed tomography (ceMDCT) using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) as the reference standard.
METHODS: Forty-one patients (33 women, 8 men) underwent DXA measurement of the proximal femur. Subsequently, transverse sections of routine ceMDCT of these patients were used to measure BMD of the femoral head and femoral neck. The MDCT-to-DXA conversion equations for BMD and T-score were calculated using linear regression analysis. The conversion equations were applied to the MDCT data sets of 382 patients (120 women, 262 men) of whom 74 had osteoporotic fractures.
RESULTS: A correlation coefficient of r = 0.84 (P < 0.05) was calculated for BMD(MDCT) values of the femoral head and DXA T-scores of the total proximal femur using the conversion equation T-score = 0.021 × BMD(MDCT) - 5.90. The correlation coefficient for the femoral neck was r = 0.79 (P < 0.05) with the conversion equation T-score = 0.016 × BMD(MDCT) - 4.28. Accordingly, converted T-scores for the femoral neck in patients with versus those without osteoporotic fractures were significantly different (female, -1.83 versus -1.47; male, -1.86 versus -1.47; P < 0.05).
CONCLUSION: BMD measurements of the proximal femur were computed in routine contrast-enhanced MDCT and converted to DXA T-scores, which adequately differentiated patients with and without osteoporotic fractures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22932742     DOI: 10.1007/s00330-012-2629-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Radiol        ISSN: 0938-7994            Impact factor:   5.315


  29 in total

Review 1.  Quantitative ultrasond in the assessment of osteoporosis.

Authors:  Giuseppe Guglielmi; Francesca de Terlizzi
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2009-08-03       Impact factor: 3.528

2.  International Society for Clinical Densitometry 2007 Adult and Pediatric Official Positions.

Authors:  E Michael Lewiecki; Catherine M Gordon; Sanford Baim; Mary B Leonard; Nicholas J Bishop; Maria-Luisa Bianchi; Heidi J Kalkwarf; Craig B Langman; Horatio Plotkin; Frank Rauch; Babette S Zemel; Neil Binkley; John P Bilezikian; David L Kendler; Didier B Hans; Stuart Silverman
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2008-08-15       Impact factor: 4.398

3.  Declaration of Helsinki. Ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Indian Med Assoc       Date:  2009-06

Review 4.  Treatment-related osteoporosis in men with prostate cancer.

Authors:  Matthew R Smith
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2006-10-15       Impact factor: 12.531

Review 5.  Osteoporosis and fragility fractures.

Authors:  Lídia Sànchez-Riera; Nicholas Wilson; Narainraj Kamalaraj; Joan M Nolla; Cindy Kok; Yang Li; Monique Macara; Rosana Norman; Jian Sheng Chen; Emma U R Smith; Philip N Sambrook; Carmen Santos Hernández; Anthony Woolf; Lyn March
Journal:  Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 4.098

6.  Converted lumbar BMD values derived from sagittal reformations of contrast-enhanced MDCT predict incidental osteoporotic vertebral fractures.

Authors:  Thomas Baum; Dirk Müller; Martin Dobritz; Petra Wolf; Ernst J Rummeny; Thomas M Link; Jan S Bauer
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  2012-04-07       Impact factor: 4.333

7.  Functional outcome and quality of life following hip fracture in elderly women: a prospective controlled study.

Authors:  Steven Boonen; Philippe Autier; Martine Barette; Dirk Vanderschueren; Paul Lips; Patrick Haentjens
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2003-11-07       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 8.  Osteoporosis epidemiology update.

Authors:  Zoe A Cole; Elaine M Dennison; Cyrus Cooper
Journal:  Curr Rheumatol Rep       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 4.592

9.  Compromised bone marrow perfusion in osteoporosis.

Authors:  James F Griffith; David K W Yeung; Polly H Tsang; Kai C Choi; Timothy C Y Kwok; Anil T Ahuja; Kwok S Leung; Ping C Leung
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 6.741

Review 10.  Update on identifying and managing osteoporosis in women with breast cancer.

Authors:  Deanna Sanchez Yamamoto; Pamela Hallquist Viale
Journal:  Clin J Oncol Nurs       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 1.027

View more
  12 in total

1.  Opportunistic screening for osteoporosis on routine computed tomography? An external validation study.

Authors:  Constantinus F Buckens; Gawein Dijkhuis; Bart de Keizer; Harald J Verhaar; Pim A de Jong
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-01-17       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Comparison of the diagnostic performance of CT Hounsfield unit histogram analysis and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in predicting osteoporosis of the femur.

Authors:  Hyun Kyung Lim; Hong Il Ha; Sun-Young Park; Kwanseop Lee
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-09-25       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Intravenous contrast injection significantly affects bone mineral density measured on CT.

Authors:  Esther Pompe; Martin J Willemink; Gawein R Dijkhuis; Harald J J Verhaar; Firdaus A A Mohamed Hoesein; Pim A de Jong
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2014-09-05       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Proximal Femur Hounsfield Units on CT Colonoscopy Correlate With Dual-energy X-ray Absorptiometry.

Authors:  Daniel L Christensen; Kyle E Nappo; Jared A Wolfe; Sean M Wade; Daniel I Brooks; Benjamin K Potter; Jonathan A Forsberg; Scott M Tintle
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Development of an open-source measurement system to assess the areal bone mineral density of the proximal femur from clinical CT images.

Authors:  Keisuke Uemura; Yoshito Otake; Masaki Takao; Hiroki Makino; Mazen Soufi; Makoto Iwasa; Nobuhiko Sugano; Yoshinobu Sato
Journal:  Arch Osteoporos       Date:  2022-01-17       Impact factor: 2.617

Review 6.  Fracture Prediction by Computed Tomography and Finite Element Analysis: Current and Future Perspectives.

Authors:  Fjola Johannesdottir; Brett Allaire; Mary L Bouxsein
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 5.096

7.  In-vivo assessment of femoral bone strength using Finite Element Analysis (FEA) based on routine MDCT imaging: a preliminary study on patients with vertebral fractures.

Authors:  Hans Liebl; Eduardo Grande Garcia; Fabian Holzner; Peter B Noel; Rainer Burgkart; Ernst J Rummeny; Thomas Baum; Jan S Bauer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-02-27       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  CTXA hip--an extension of classical DXA measurements using quantitative CT.

Authors:  Christopher E Cann; Judith E Adams; J Keenan Brown; Alan D Brett
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-03-17       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Bone Mineral Density Estimations From Routine Multidetector Computed Tomography: A Comparative Study of Contrast and Calibration Effects.

Authors:  Johannes Kaesmacher; Hans Liebl; Thomas Baum; Jan Stefan Kirschke
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  2017 Mar/Apr       Impact factor: 1.826

Review 10.  Quantitative computed tomography and opportunistic bone density screening by dual use of computed tomography scans.

Authors:  Alan D Brett; J Keenan Brown
Journal:  J Orthop Translat       Date:  2015-09-15       Impact factor: 5.191

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.