Literature DB >> 14605799

Functional outcome and quality of life following hip fracture in elderly women: a prospective controlled study.

Steven Boonen1, Philippe Autier, Martine Barette, Dirk Vanderschueren, Paul Lips, Patrick Haentjens.   

Abstract

The aim of this prospective study was to document the functional outcome and quality of life (QoL) over 1 year following hip fracture in elderly women. A total of 159 unselected elderly women with a first hip fracture were matched for age and residence with an equal number of control women. Functional status was measured by completing a Rapid Disability Rating Scale version 2 (RDRS-2) questionnaire [score ranging from 0 (best) to 54 (worse)], before hospital discharge and 12 months later. To examine longitudinal change in health-related QoL, fracture subjects and controls completed the Short Form 36 (SF-36) questionnaire. For the 134 women still alive at 1 year, the mean RDRS-2 score before hospital discharge was 16.2 (95% CI: 15.0-18.0) and 3.5 (2.6-4.3) in patients and controls, respectively ( P<0.001). During the year following hospital discharge, the mean RDRS-2 score improved to 13.0 (11.1-14.1) in hip-fracture women and worsened to 4.3 (3.3-5.0) in the control group (differences with initial scores: P<0.001 in both groups). After adjustment for potential confounders (including age and comorbidity), the estimated functional decline attributable to a hip fracture was 24% in the first year. Poor functional status upon discharge was the strongest predictor of a poor functional status at 1 year. Overall, similar trends were observed when using SF-36 scores as compared with RDRS-2 scores. However, only 51% of the study population was able to complete the SF-36 questionnaire at discharge and after 1 year, and these subjects were considerably younger ( P<0.001), had less cognitive impairment ( P<0.001), and had better functional status ( P<0.001) than those who were unable to complete the SF-36. For those women able to complete the SF-36 questionnaires, the mean SF-36 score before hospital discharge was 56.4 (95% CI: 51.9-60.9) and 71.1 (67.5-74.8) in patients and controls, respectively ( P<0.001). During the year following hospital discharge, the mean SF-36 score improved significantly to 61.1 (56.5-65.7) in hip-fracture patients ( P=0.03), but remained unchanged in the control group ( P=0.23). Overall, the results of this study indicate that women who sustain a hip fracture continue to suffer from substantial functional impairment and loss in QoL at 1 year, despite a significant recovery during this 12-month period. Function upon hospital discharge is the strongest predictor of functional status 1 year later. Assessing QoL in hip fracture women through self-administered questionnaires is subject to considerable bias due to non-response.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14605799     DOI: 10.1007/s00198-003-1515-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Osteoporos Int        ISSN: 0937-941X            Impact factor:   4.507


  23 in total

1.  The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection.

Authors:  J E Ware; C D Sherbourne
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 2.983

2.  Predictors of functional recovery after hip fracture in the elderly.

Authors:  K J Koval; M L Skovron; G B Aharonoff; J D Zuckerman
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Determinants of recovery 12 months after hip fracture: the importance of psychosocial factors.

Authors:  J M Mossey; E Mutran; K Knott; R Craik
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 9.308

4.  Intertrochanteric versus femoral neck hip fractures: differential characteristics, treatment, and sequelae.

Authors:  K M Fox; J Magaziner; J R Hebel; J E Kenzora; T M Kashner
Journal:  J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 6.053

5.  A case-control study of quality of life and functional impairment in women with long-standing vertebral osteoporotic fracture.

Authors:  S E Hall; R A Criddle; T L Comito; R L Prince
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 4.507

6.  The rapid disability rating scale-2.

Authors:  M W Linn; B S Linn
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  1982-06       Impact factor: 5.562

7.  Deterioration in quality of life following hip fracture: a prospective study.

Authors:  A G Randell; T V Nguyen; N Bhalerao; S L Silverman; P N Sambrook; J A Eisman
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 8.  Epidemiology and outcomes of osteoporotic fractures.

Authors:  Steven R Cummings; L Joseph Melton
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2002-05-18       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  The effect of hip fracture on mortality, hospitalization, and functional status: a prospective study.

Authors:  F D Wolinsky; J F Fitzgerald; T E Stump
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 9.308

10.  Risk factors for hip fracture in a high incidence area: a case-control study from Oslo, Norway.

Authors:  H E Meyer; C Henriksen; J A Falch; J I Pedersen; A Tverdal
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 4.507

View more
  80 in total

1.  Potentially Inappropriate Medications and the Time to Full Functional Recovery After Hip Fracture.

Authors:  Andrea Iaboni; Kerri Rawson; Craig Burkett; Eric J Lenze; Alastair J Flint
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 3.923

2.  A prognostic model predicting recovery of walking independence of elderly patients after hip-fracture surgery. An experiment in a rehabilitation unit in Northern Italy.

Authors:  G Bellelli; M Noale; F Guerini; R Turco; S Maggi; G Crepaldi; M Trabucchi
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2012-01-06       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  Activities of daily living after hip fracture: profile and rate of recovery during 2 years of follow-up.

Authors:  T Alarcón; J I González-Montalvo; P Gotor; R Madero; A Otero
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2010-06-03       Impact factor: 4.507

4.  Hip fracture and other predictors of anti-osteoporosis drug use in Norway.

Authors:  H M Devold; A J Søgaard; A Tverdal; J A Falch; K Furu; H E Meyer
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2012-07-10       Impact factor: 4.507

5.  Epidemiology of hip fractures in northwestern Italy: a multicentric regional study on incidence of hip fractures and their outcome at 3-year follow-up.

Authors:  Federico Dettoni; Alberto Peveraro; Angelo Dettoni; Roberto Rossi; Filippo Castoldi; Ali Zareh; Fabrizio Amberti; Alessio Giai Via; Alessio Giai Via; Davide Bonasia
Journal:  Musculoskelet Surg       Date:  2011-07-17

Review 6.  Sideways fall-induced impact force and its effect on hip fracture risk: a review.

Authors:  M Nasiri Sarvi; Y Luo
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2017-07-20       Impact factor: 4.507

7.  Association of nutritional status as measured by the Mini-Nutritional Assessment Short Form with changes in mobility, institutionalization and death after hip fracture.

Authors:  M Nuotio; P Tuominen; T Luukkaala
Journal:  Eur J Clin Nutr       Date:  2015-10-21       Impact factor: 4.016

Review 8.  Outcome in geriatric fracture patients and how it can be improved.

Authors:  T Roth; C Kammerlander; M Gosch; T J Luger; M Blauth
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2010-11-06       Impact factor: 4.507

9.  Examining Contextual Influences on Fall-Related Injuries Among Older Adults for Population Health Management.

Authors:  Geoffrey J Hoffman; Hector P Rodriguez
Journal:  Popul Health Manag       Date:  2015-04-28       Impact factor: 2.459

10.  Evaluation of the health-related quality of life in elderly patients according to the type of hip fracture: femoral neck or trochanteric.

Authors:  Tânia Maria da Silva Mendonça; Carlos Henrique Martins da Silva; Roberto Sérgio de Tavares Canto; Nívea de Macedo Oliveira Morales; Rogério de Melo Costa Pinto; Rogério de Rizo Morales
Journal:  Clinics (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 2.365

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.