Literature DB >> 22931865

Extended frequency range hearing thresholds and otoacoustic emissions in acute acoustic trauma.

Markus Büchler1, Martin Kompis, Michel André Hotz.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: We sought to evaluate the relative value of pure tone audiometry (PTA), extended high-frequency audiometry (EFA) and transiently evoked otoacoustic emissions (OAE) and distortion products when monitoring acute acoustic trauma (AAT). STUDY
DESIGN: Controlled prospective clinical study.
SETTING: Tertiary referral center. PATIENTS: Seventy one active duty soldiers in the same age with normal hearing
INTERVENTIONS: Forty one soldiers suffered assault-rifle-induced acute acoustic traumas with hearing loss and tinnitus. Thirty soldiers served as a control group. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Pure tone threshold changes detected by PTA and EFA, amplitude and reproducibility changes in transiently evoked OAE, distortion products, and tinnitus analysis based on a visual analog scale.
RESULTS: Assault rifle-induced AAT caused unilateral temporary threshold shifts (TTS) in PTA and bilateral TTS in EFA. Two frequency regions with the largest threshold shifts were identified: one between 3 and 6 kHz and another between 11 and 14 kHz. The reproducibility of transiently evoked OAEs revealed changes related to the acoustic trauma in the 3- to 5-kHz frequency window. The amplitudes of the low stimulation level distortion products at 6 kHz were correlated with the audiometric AAT-induced TTS.
CONCLUSION: Acute acoustic trauma-induced audiometric TTS are predominantly confined to 2 specific frequency regions. PTA and EFA are both necessary to identify the full extent of acute acoustic trauma. PTA and EFA revealed that the TTSs were correlated to with distortion product OAE amplitude shifts at 6 kHz and changes in the reproducibility of transiently evoked OAE in the 3- to 5-kHz frequency window. PTA remains the most important measurement to monitor AAT. It may be useful to complement it with EFA, focusing on the 11 to 14 kHz frequency range. If used, OAE should be analyzed in the frequency range of 3 to 6 kHz.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22931865     DOI: 10.1097/MAO.0b013e318263d598

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Otol Neurotol        ISSN: 1531-7129            Impact factor:   2.311


  9 in total

1.  A longitudinal study of changes in distortion-product otoacoustic emissions and pure-tone thresholds in an industrial setting.

Authors:  Antonis Moukos; Dimitrios G Balatsouras; Thomas Nikolopoulos; Pavlos Maragoudakis; Evangelos I Yiotakis; Stavros G Korres; Dimitrios Kandiloros
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2013-10-11       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  Conventional Audiometry, Extended High-Frequency Audiometry, and DPOAE for Early Diagnosis of NIHL.

Authors:  Amir Houshang Mehrparvar; Seyyed Jalil Mirmohammadi; Mohammad Hossein Davari; Mehrdad Mostaghaci; Abolfazl Mollasadeghi; Maryam Bahaloo; Seyyed Hesam Hashemi
Journal:  Iran Red Crescent Med J       Date:  2014-01-05       Impact factor: 0.611

3.  The influence of self-reported noise exposure on 2ƒ12 distortion product otoacoustic emission level, fine structure, and components in a normal-hearing population.

Authors:  Gayla L Poling; Jonathan H Siegel; Jungwha Lee; Sumitrajit Dhar
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2022-04       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 4.  [The professional ear user-implications for the prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of ear diseases].

Authors:  David Bächinger; Raphael Jecker; Jean-Christoph Hannig; Andreas Werner; Horst Hildebrandt; Michael Eidenbenz; Martin Kompis; Tobias Kleinjung; Dorothe Veraguth
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2022-10-21       Impact factor: 1.330

5.  Evaluation of early hearing damage in personal listening device users using extended high-frequency audiometry and otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  A H Sulaiman; R Husain; K Seluakumaran
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2013-06-28       Impact factor: 2.503

6.  Profiles of Stimulus-Frequency Otoacoustic Emissions from 0.5 to 20 kHz in Humans.

Authors:  James B Dewey; Sumitrajit Dhar
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2016-09-28

7.  Evaluation of Distortion Product Otoacoustic Emissions (DPOAEs) among workers at an Industrial Company exposed to different industrial noise levels in 2014.

Authors:  Sajad Zare; Parvin Nassiri; Mohammad Reza Monazzam; Akram Pourbakht; Kamal Azam; Taghi Golmohammadi
Journal:  Electron Physician       Date:  2015-07-20

8.  Decreased Speech-In-Noise Understanding in Young Adults with Tinnitus.

Authors:  Annick Gilles; Winny Schlee; Sarah Rabau; Kristien Wouters; Erik Fransen; Paul Van de Heyning
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2016-06-28       Impact factor: 4.677

9.  Time-controllable Nkcc1 knockdown replicates reversible hearing loss in postnatal mice.

Authors:  Takahisa Watabe; Ming Xu; Miho Watanabe; Junichi Nabekura; Taiga Higuchi; Karin Hori; Mitsuo P Sato; Fumiaki Nin; Hiroshi Hibino; Kaoru Ogawa; Masatsugu Masuda; Kenji F Tanaka
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-10-19       Impact factor: 4.379

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.