PURPOSE: To investigate the restoration of knee proprioception after anatomic double-bundle ACL reconstruction. METHODS: Eleven subjects who underwent anatomic double-bundle ACL reconstruction (12.5-15 months following surgery) and eleven healthy control subjects participated in the study. Sagittal and transverse plane threshold to detect passive motion (TTDPM) were assessed utilizing a customized isokinetic dynamometer by passively rotating the tibia about a fixed femur in both the sagittal plane and transverse plane at 0.25°/s until the subject signalled recognition of movement and movement direction. Based on the normality assumption, either dependent t test or Wilcoxon test was utilized to determine whether significant differences were present between the ACL-reconstructed and the uninjured contralateral limbs. Independent t test or Mann-Whitney test was utilized to compare between the ACL-reconstructed/uninjured contralateral and the external control limbs. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in TTDPM measurement in eleven out of twelve comparisons between the ACL-reconstructed and the uninjured contralateral/external control limbs. The only statistical significant difference was found on TTDPM towards internal rotation direction from the externally rotated-test position between the ACL-reconstructed and the uninjured contralateral limbs (p = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Based on a small sample of eleven subjects, the current results indicate a restoration of both sagittal and transverse plane TTDPM following the anatomic double-bundle ACL reconstruction. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.
PURPOSE: To investigate the restoration of knee proprioception after anatomic double-bundle ACL reconstruction. METHODS: Eleven subjects who underwent anatomic double-bundle ACL reconstruction (12.5-15 months following surgery) and eleven healthy control subjects participated in the study. Sagittal and transverse plane threshold to detect passive motion (TTDPM) were assessed utilizing a customized isokinetic dynamometer by passively rotating the tibia about a fixed femur in both the sagittal plane and transverse plane at 0.25°/s until the subject signalled recognition of movement and movement direction. Based on the normality assumption, either dependent t test or Wilcoxon test was utilized to determine whether significant differences were present between the ACL-reconstructed and the uninjured contralateral limbs. Independent t test or Mann-Whitney test was utilized to compare between the ACL-reconstructed/uninjured contralateral and the external control limbs. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in TTDPM measurement in eleven out of twelve comparisons between the ACL-reconstructed and the uninjured contralateral/external control limbs. The only statistical significant difference was found on TTDPM towards internal rotation direction from the externally rotated-test position between the ACL-reconstructed and the uninjured contralateral limbs (p = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Based on a small sample of eleven subjects, the current results indicate a restoration of both sagittal and transverse plane TTDPM following the anatomic double-bundle ACL reconstruction. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.
Authors: Joshua M Drouin; Tamara C Valovich-mcLeod; Sandra J Shultz; Bruce M Gansneder; David H Perrin Journal: Eur J Appl Physiol Date: 2003-09-24 Impact factor: 3.078
Authors: Volker Musahl; James E Voos; Padhraig F O'Loughlin; Daniel Choi; Volker Stueber; Daniel Kendoff; Andrew D Pearle Journal: Arthroscopy Date: 2010-08-09 Impact factor: 4.772
Authors: Bruce Reider; Michel A Arcand; Lee H Diehl; Kenneth Mroczek; Armand Abulencia; C Christopher Stroud; Melanie Palm; Jennifer Gilbertson; Patricia Staszak Journal: Arthroscopy Date: 2003-01 Impact factor: 4.772
Authors: Andrew Strong; Ashokan Arumugam; Eva Tengman; Ulrik Röijezon; Charlotte K Häger Journal: J Orthop Surg Res Date: 2022-03-04 Impact factor: 2.359