Literature DB >> 12808543

Reliability and validity of ankle proprioceptive measures.

Nandini Deshpande1, Denise M Connelly, Elsie G Culham, Patrick A Costigan.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the reliability and validity of ankle proprioceptive measures.
DESIGN: Reliability was assessed between test occasions. Construct validity was addressed by the ability of measures to differentiate among groups.
SETTING: Laboratory of an educational institution. PARTICIPANTS: Eight healthy adults were recruited into each of 3 groups: (1) young (20-39y), (2) middle-aged (40-59y), and (3) older adults (>or=60y). Four subjects from each group (n=12) participated in retesting.
INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Threshold for perception of passive movement, error in active reproduction of position, error in reproduction of velocity, and error in reproduction of torque.
RESULTS: Intersession reliability was excellent (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC] range, .79 - .95) for threshold for perception of movement, error in active reproduction, error in velocity reproduction, and error in dorsiflexion torque reproduction; intersession reliability was good for error in reproduction of plantarflexion torque (ICC=.72). Threshold for perception of movement differed between groups 1 and 3 and between groups 2 and 3 (P<.05). Error in reproduction of position was greater in group 2 than in group 1 (P<.05).
CONCLUSION: Differences in proprioception between the older and the 2 younger groups were best detected by using threshold for perception of passive movement.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12808543     DOI: 10.1016/s0003-9993(03)00016-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil        ISSN: 0003-9993            Impact factor:   3.966


  21 in total

1.  Ageing of internal models: from a continuous to an intermittent proprioceptive control of movement.

Authors:  Matthieu P Boisgontier; Vincent Nougier
Journal:  Age (Dordr)       Date:  2012-05-26

2.  Accuracy of Clinical Techniques for Evaluating Lower Limb Sensorimotor Functions Associated With Increased Fall Risk.

Authors:  Alex Donaghy; Trina DeMott; Lara Allet; Hogene Kim; James Ashton-Miller; James K Richardson
Journal:  PM R       Date:  2015-09-25       Impact factor: 2.298

3.  Assessing proprioceptive function: evaluating joint position matching methods against psychophysical thresholds.

Authors:  Naveen Elangovan; Amanda Herrmann; Jürgen Konczak
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2013-11-21

4.  Presbypropria: the effects of physiological ageing on proprioceptive control.

Authors:  Matthieu P Boisgontier; Isabelle Olivier; Olivier Chenu; Vincent Nougier
Journal:  Age (Dordr)       Date:  2011-08-18

5.  Sex-specific age associations of ankle proprioception test performance in older adults: results from the Baltimore Longitudinal Study of Aging.

Authors:  Seung-Uk Ko; Eleanor Simonsick; Nandini Deshpande; Luigi Ferrucci
Journal:  Age Ageing       Date:  2015-01-29       Impact factor: 10.668

6.  Restoration of sagittal and transverse plane proprioception following anatomic double-bundle ACL reconstruction.

Authors:  Takashi Nagai; Nicholas R Heebner; Timothy C Sell; Takumi Nakagawa; Freddie H Fu; Scott M Lephart
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-08-29       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  Ankle Proprioception-Associated Gait Patterns in Older Adults: Results from the Baltimore Longitudinal Study of Aging.

Authors:  Seung-Uk Ko; Eleanor M Simonsick; Nandini Deshpande; Stephanie Studenski; Luigi Ferrucci
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 5.411

8.  New method of measuring wrist joint position sense avoiding cutaneous and visual inputs.

Authors:  Andre Gay; Kimberly Harbst; Kenton R Kaufman; Diana K Hansen; Edward R Laskowski; Richard A Berger
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2010-02-10       Impact factor: 4.262

9.  Community-dwelling adults with a history of falling report lower perceived postural stability during a foam eyes closed test than non-fallers.

Authors:  E Anson; S Studenski; P J Sparto; Y Agrawal
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2019-01-02       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Knee proprioception and strength and landing kinematics during a single-leg stop-jump task.

Authors:  Takashi Nagai; Timothy C Sell; Anthony J House; John P Abt; Scott M Lephart
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2013 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.860

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.