Literature DB >> 22929493

Is low-molecular-weight heparin safe for venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in patients with traumatic brain injury? A Western Trauma Association multicenter study.

Michael E Kwiatt1, Mitul S Patel, Steven E Ross, Mary T Lachant, Heather G MacNew, M Gage Ochsner, Scott H Norwood, LaDonna Speier, Rosemary Kozar, Jonathan A Gerber, Susan Rowell, Sheetal Krishnakumar, David H Livingston, George Manis, James M Haan.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a significant risk in trauma patients. Although low-molecular weight heparin (LMWH) is effective in VTE prophylaxis, its use for patients with traumatic intracranial hemorrhage remains controversial. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety of LMWH for VTE prophylaxis in blunt intracranial injury.
METHODS: We conducted a retrospective multicenter study of LMWH chemoprophylaxis on patients with intracranial hemorrhage caused by blunt trauma. Patients with brain Abbreviated Injury Scale score of 3 or higher, age 18 years or older, and at least one repeated head computed tomographic scan were included. Patients with previous VTE; on preinjury anticoagulation; hospitalized for less than 48 hours; on heparin for VTE prophylaxis; or required emergent thoracic, abdominal, or vascular surgery at admission were excluded. Patients were divided into two groups: those who received LMWH and those who did not. The primary outcome was progression of intracranial hemorrhage on repeated head computed tomographic scan.
RESULTS: The study included 1,215 patients, of which 220 patients (18.1%) received LMWH and 995 (81.9%) did not. Hemorrhage progression occurred in 239 of 995 control subjects and 93 of 220 LMWH patients (24% vs. 42%, p < 0.001). Hemorrhage progression occurred in 32 patients after initiating LMWH (14.5%). Nine of these patients (4.1%) required neurosurgical intervention for hemorrhage progression.
CONCLUSION: Patients receiving LMWH were at higher risk for hemorrhage progression. We were unable to demonstrate safety of LMWH for VTE prophylaxis in patients with brain injury. The risk of using LMWH may exceed its benefit. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic study, level IV.
Copyright © 2012 by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22929493     DOI: 10.1097/TA.0b013e318265cab9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Trauma Acute Care Surg        ISSN: 2163-0755            Impact factor:   3.313


  9 in total

1.  Venous thromboembolism prophylaxis and the impact of a thrombosis service at a Canadian level 1 trauma centre

Authors:  Paul T. Engels; Heather Thomas; Angela Coates; Husham Bakry; Abdulaziz Alali; Ahmad AlGhambdi; Ahmed Al-Jabri; Ahmed Bugshan
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2019-12-01       Impact factor: 2.089

2.  EpCAM aptamer mediated cancer cell specific delivery of EpCAM siRNA using polymeric nanocomplex.

Authors:  Nithya Subramanian; Jagat R Kanwar; Prasanna Kumar Athalya; Narayanan Janakiraman; Vikas Khetan; Rupinder K Kanwar; Sailaja Eluchuri; Subramanian Krishnakumar
Journal:  J Biomed Sci       Date:  2015-01-09       Impact factor: 8.410

3.  EpCAM Aptamer-siRNA Chimera Targets and Regress Epithelial Cancer.

Authors:  Nithya Subramanian; Jagat R Kanwar; Rupinder K Kanwar; JagadeeshBabu Sreemanthula; Jyotirmay Biswas; Vikas Khetan; Subramanian Krishnakumar
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-07-15       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 4.  Timing for deep vein thrombosis chemoprophylaxis in traumatic brain injury: an evidence-based review.

Authors:  Hiba Abdel-Aziz; C Michael Dunham; Rema J Malik; Barbara M Hileman
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2015-03-24       Impact factor: 9.097

5.  Venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in patients with traumatic brain injury: a systematic review.

Authors:  Yohalakshmi Chelladurai; Kent A Stevens; Elliott R Haut; Daniel J Brotman; Ritu Sharma; Kenneth M Shermock; Sosena Kebede; Sonal Singh; Jodi B Segal
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2013-05-29

6.  High level of venous thromboembolism in critically ill trauma patients despite early and well-driven thromboprophylaxis protocol.

Authors:  S R Hamada; C Espina; T Guedj; R Buaron; A Harrois; S Figueiredo; J Duranteau
Journal:  Ann Intensive Care       Date:  2017-09-12       Impact factor: 6.925

7.  Intracranial pressure monitors associated with increased venous thromboembolism in severe traumatic brain injury.

Authors:  Angela Allen; Areg Grigorian; Ashton Christian; Sebastian D Schubl; Cristobal Barrios; Michael Lekawa; Borris Borazjani; Victor Joe; Jeffry Nahmias
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2020-03-10       Impact factor: 3.693

Review 8.  Perioperative Management of Severe Traumatic Brain Injury: What Is New?

Authors:  Deacon Farrell; Audrée A Bendo
Journal:  Curr Anesthesiol Rep       Date:  2018-08-14

9.  Pharmaceutical Venous Thrombosis Prophylaxis in Critically Ill Traumatic Brain Injury Patients.

Authors:  Jilske A Huijben; Dana Pisica; Iris Ceyisakar; Nino Stocchetti; Giuseppe Citerio; Andrew I R Maas; Ewout W Steyerberg; David K Menon; Mathieu van der Jagt; Hester F Lingsma
Journal:  Neurotrauma Rep       Date:  2022-01-07
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.