| Literature DB >> 22929185 |
Thekra A Al-Kashwan1, Massoud Houshmand, Asaad Al-Janabi, Alice K Melconian, Dhafir Al-Abbasi, Muhammad N Al-Musawi, Maryam Rostami, Akeel A Yasseen.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: To unfold specific-mutational patterns in TP53 gene due to exposures to war environmental hazards and to detect the association of TP53 gene alteration with the depth of bladder cancer.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2012 PMID: 22929185 PMCID: PMC3439300 DOI: 10.1186/1756-0500-5-466
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Res Notes ISSN: 1756-0500
Figure 1Example of PCR-SSCP/HD and DNA sequencing analysis of p53 gene in transitional cell carcinoma. (a) PCR-SSCP/HD analysis of exon 5 shows extra bands and bands with mobility shift indicated by arrows (−ve: undenaturated DNA control; +ve: denaturated DNA control, and T: tumors). DNA sequencing reveals transition CGC → CAC at codon 175 in exon 5 (b) and insertion A after codon 244 (GGC) in exon in exon 7 (d) in compared to wild types (c) and (e) respectively (arrows).
Mutational analysis of the p53 detection by SSCP and DNA sequencing, p53 nuclear reactivity and p53 status
| 1 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 2 | - | - | - | | - | - | - |
| 3 | 5/184 | GAT→AAT | G→A | Ts | Asp184Asn | ++ | + |
| 4 | - | - | - | | - | - | - |
| 5 | 7/244 | GGC→GGA | C→A | Tv | Gly244Gly | - | - |
| 6 | 7/230 | Del A | - | Fr | - | - | + |
| 7 | 7/NS | - | - | | - | ++ | + |
| 8 | - | - | - | | - | - | - |
| 9 | - | - | - | | - | ++ | + |
| 10 | - | - | - | | - | ++ | + |
| 11 | - | - | - | | - | - | - |
| 12* | 5/154 | GGC→GGA | C→A | Tv | Gly154Gly | + | + |
| | 6/192 | CAG→CAC | G→C | Tv | Glu192His | | |
| 13 | 7/244 | + A | - | Fr | - | - | + |
| 14 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 15 | 7/244 | + A | - | Fr | - | - | + |
| 16 | - | - | - | - | - | ++ | + |
| 17 | - | - | - | - | - | + | + |
| 18 | - | - | - | - | - | + | + |
| 19 | - | - | - | - | - | ++ | + |
| 20* | 6/196 | CGA→CAA | G→A | Ts | Arg196Glu | ++ | + |
| | 8/283 | CGC→CCC | G→C | Tv | Arg283Pro | | |
| 21 | 5/175 | CGC→CAC | G→A | Ts | Arg175His | ++ | + |
| 22 | 5/176 | TGC→GGC | T→G | Tv | Cys176Gly | ++ | + |
| 23 | - | - | - | - | - | ++ | + |
| 24 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 25* | 8/293 | Del G | - | Fr | - | - | + |
| | 8/294 | GAG→GAA | G→A | Ts | Glu294Glu | | |
| 26 | 6/196 | CGA→CAA | G→A | Ts | Arg196Glu | ++ | + |
| 27 | - | - | - | - | - | ++ | + |
| 28 | - | | | | | ++ | + |
| 29 | - | - | - | - | ++ | + |
p53 status; + has alteration (mutation) or immunoreactivty +,++ (IHC), -; no alteration (mutation (−) and IHC (−,+/−), Ts; Transition, Tv; Transvertion, *; Tumor with double mutation, NS; DNA not sequenced but p53 mutation detected by SSCP analysis, - G; deletion of one base (G) at codon 293, - A; deletion of one base (A) at codon 230, + A; Insertion of one base (A) after codon 244/exon 7, Fr; Frameshift.
Association between p53 mutations as analyzed by SSCP and DNA sequencing, p53 immunoreactivty and p53 status with clinicopathological features
| Total | 29 | 11(37.9) | 18(62.1) | | | 6(20.7) | 6(20.7) | 12(41.4) | 3(10.3) | 14(48.3) | 17(58.6) | | 21(72.4) | 8(27.6) | |
| Grade | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Low(I&II) | 14 | 5(35.7) | 9(64.3) | 1.2 | 0.26-5.4 | 4(28.6) | 5(35.7) | 9(64.3) | 1(7.1) | 4(28.6) | 5(35.7) | 0.02 | 7(50) | 7(50) | 0.01 |
| High (III) | 15 | 6(40) | 9(60) | 2(13.3) | 1(6.7) | 3(20) | 2(13.3) | 10(66.7) | 12(80) | 14(93.3) | 1(6.9) | ||||
| Stage | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Low(Ta&T1) | 14 | 5(35.7) | 9(64.3) | 1.2 | 0.26-5.4 | 4(28.6) | 5(35.7) | 9(64.3) | 1(7.1) | 4(28.6) | 5(35.7) | 0.02 | 7(50) | 7(50) | 0.01 |
| High (T2) | 15 | 6(40) | 9(60) | 2(13.3) | 1(6.7) | 3(20) | 2(13.3) | 10(66.7) | 12(80) | 14(93.3) | 1(6.9) | ||||
Negative indicates that less than 10% of tumor nuclei demonstrated p53 immunoreactivty, positive; 10% or more of tumor nuclei demonstrated p53 immunoreactivty, p53 status; + has alteration (mutation, or immunoreactivty score +,++, or both), - no alteration (mutation (−) and IHC (score -, +/−) for p53), OR, Odds Ratio; CI, Confidence Intervals, P Value ≤ 0.05 or 0.01 (Fisher’s exact probability test).
Figure 2Immunohistochemical detection of p53 nuclear reactivity in transitional cell carcinoma (a) Invasive transitional cell carcinoma, poorly differentiated (Grade III) showing no detectible nuclear p53 immunostaining (Score (−), (10X)).(b) Papillary transitional cell carcinoma, well differentiated (Grade I) showing a few p53 immunoreactivty of tumor nuclei (Score (+/−), arrowed, (10X and 40X)). (c) Invasive transitional cell carcinoma, poorly differentiated (Grade II) showing heterogeneous p53 nuclear immunostaining (Score (+); arrowed,(40X)). (d) Papillary transitional cell carcinoma, well differentiated (Grade I) showing homogenous intense p53 nuclear immunostaining (Score (++); yellow arrow, (10X and 40X), (Red arrow indicates surrounding stromal and infiltrative lymphocytes with no detectible nuclear p53 immunostaining)).
Relation of p53 immunoreactivty to p53 mutation analyzed by SSCP and DNA sequencing
| p53 mutation No. (%) | 29 | 17(58.6) | 12(41.4) | |
| p53 mut | 11(37.9) | 7(63.7) | 4(36.3) | 0.09 |
| p53 wt | 18(62.1) | 10(55.6) | 8(44.4) | |
P-value> 0.05 (Fisher’s exact probability test); Mut, mutant; wt, wild-type.