Literature DB >> 12919957

P53 alterations in bladder tumors from arsenic and tobacco exposed patients.

Lee E Moore1, Allan H Smith, Clarence Eng, Sandy DeVries, Dave Kalman, Vivek Bhargava, Karen Chew, Catterina Ferreccio, Omar A Rey, Claudia Hopenhayn, Mary Lou Biggs, Michael N Bates, Frederic M Waldman.   

Abstract

Previous studies demonstrated that tobacco and arsenic exposure are risk factors for bladder cancer. A case-case study was conducted to compare p53 mutations in 147 bladder tumors from South American patients by tobacco and arsenic exposure. Information on residential history and lifestyle factors was collected. The prevalence of p53 mutations and protein expression was examined in relation to tumor stage, grade, patient age, gender, tobacco and arsenic exposure. Smokers were grouped as ever/never smokers and by pack years of exposure (0, 1-20, >20). Patients were also grouped into four arsenic exposure categories based on the average of the five highest years arsenic concentration in their drinking water: group 1, non-detectable to <10 microg/l (n = 50); group 2, 10-99 microg/l (n = 31); group 3, 100-299 microg/l (n = 35); group 4, >300 microg/l (n = 30). The proportion of tumor samples with p53 mutations and P53 immunopositivity increased strongly with both stage and grade, but not with arsenic exposure or smoking. The prevalence of tumors containing mutational transitions increased markedly with tumor stage (from 14 to 52%, P(trend) = 0.005) and grade (from 11 to 48%, P(trend) = 0.004) and was higher in smokers than in non-smokers (34 versus 18%, respectively, P = 0.10). An increasing trend was observed with pack years of smoking (P = 0.09). The majority of mutations in tumors from both smokers and non-smokers were G-->A transitions, however, in smokers a preference for G-->A transitions at CpG sites was observed (P = 0.07, two-tailed) and a positive trend was observed with pack years of exposure (P = 0.04). A hotspot was found at codon 273 in 12% of the tumors from smokers but was not observed in never smokers (P = 0.05) and a positive trend was observed with pack years of tobacco exposure (P = 0.001). Neither stage nor grade demonstrated a preference for CpG site mutation, suggesting that these changes may be early exposure-related events in carcinogenesis and are not related to tumor progression. Arsenic exposure was not associated with an increased prevalence of p53 mutation or P53 immunopositivity and there was no evidence of interaction between arsenic and smoking with these outcome variables.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12919957     DOI: 10.1093/carcin/bgg136

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Carcinogenesis        ISSN: 0143-3334            Impact factor:   4.944


  10 in total

1.  Specific intronic p53 mutation in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma in Southern Thailand.

Authors:  Paramee Thongsuksai; Pleumjit Boonyaphiphat; Puttisak Puttawibul; Wanna Sudhikaran
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-11-14       Impact factor: 5.742

2.  N6-methyladenosine mediates arsenite-induced human keratinocyte transformation by suppressing p53 activation.

Authors:  Tianhe Zhao; Donglei Sun; Manyu Zhao; Yanhao Lai; Yuan Liu; Zunzhen Zhang
Journal:  Environ Pollut       Date:  2020-01-07       Impact factor: 8.071

3.  Cell-cycle control in urothelial carcinoma: large-scale tissue array analysis of tumor tissue from Maine and Vermont.

Authors:  Petra Lenz; Ruth Pfeiffer; Dalsu Baris; Alan R Schned; Mikiko Takikita; M Cristina Poscablo; Molly Schwenn; Alison Johnson; Michael Jones; Masatoshi Kida; Kenneth P Cantor; Nathaniel Rothman; Debra T Silverman; Stephen M Hewitt; Lee E Moore
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2012-07-03       Impact factor: 4.254

4.  Genetic polymorphisms in the DNA repair genes XPD and XRCC1, p53 gene mutations and bladder cancer risk.

Authors:  Weimin Gao; Marjorie Romkes; Shilong Zhong; Tomoko Nukui; Raj A Persad; Patrick J B Smith; Robert Branch; Phouthone Keohavong
Journal:  Oncol Rep       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 3.906

5.  Lifetime exposure to arsenic in drinking water and bladder cancer: a population-based case-control study in Michigan, USA.

Authors:  Jaymie R Meliker; Melissa J Slotnick; Gillian A AvRuskin; David Schottenfeld; Geoffrey M Jacquez; Mark L Wilson; Pierre Goovaerts; Alfred Franzblau; Jerome O Nriagu
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2010-01-19       Impact factor: 2.506

6.  Genetic variation in glutathione S-transferase omega-1, arsenic methyltransferase and methylene-tetrahydrofolate reductase, arsenic exposure and bladder cancer: a case-control study.

Authors:  Jennifer L Beebe-Dimmer; Priyanka T Iyer; Jerome O Nriagu; Greg R Keele; Shilpin Mehta; Jaymie R Meliker; Ethan M Lange; Ann G Schwartz; Kimberly A Zuhlke; David Schottenfeld; Kathleen A Cooney
Journal:  Environ Health       Date:  2012-06-29       Impact factor: 5.984

Review 7.  Bladder cancer, a review of the environmental risk factors.

Authors:  Silvia Letašiová; Alžbeta Medve'ová; Andrea Šovčíková; Mária Dušinská; Katarína Volkovová; Claudia Mosoiu; Alena Bartonová
Journal:  Environ Health       Date:  2012-06-28       Impact factor: 5.984

8.  Arsenic exposure and age and sex-specific risk for skin lesions: a population-based case-referent study in Bangladesh.

Authors:  Mahfuzar Rahman; Marie Vahter; Nazmul Sohel; Muhammad Yunus; Mohammad Abdul Wahed; Peter Kim Streatfield; Eva-Charlotte Ekström; Lars Ake Persson
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 9.031

9.  Specific-mutational patterns of p53 gene in bladder transitional cell carcinoma among a group of Iraqi patients exposed to war environmental hazards.

Authors:  Thekra A Al-Kashwan; Massoud Houshmand; Asaad Al-Janabi; Alice K Melconian; Dhafir Al-Abbasi; Muhammad N Al-Musawi; Maryam Rostami; Akeel A Yasseen
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2012-08-28

10.  Inorganic arsenic in drinking water and bladder cancer: a meta-analysis for dose-response assessment.

Authors:  Kenneth G Brown
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 3.390

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.