Literature DB >> 22929085

Emergence of extensively drug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii complex over 10 years: nationwide data from the Taiwan Surveillance of Antimicrobial Resistance (TSAR) program.

Shu-Chen Kuo1, Shan-Chwen Chang, Hui-Ying Wang, Jui-Fen Lai, Pei-Chen Chen, Yih-Ru Shiau, I-Wen Huang, Tsai-Ling Yang Lauderdale.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Acinetobacter baumannii complex (ABC) has emerged as an important pathogen causing a variety of infections. Longitudinal multicenter surveillance data on ABC from different sources in Taiwan have not been published. Using data from the Taiwan Surveillance of Antimicrobial Resistance (TSAR) conducted biennially, we investigated the secular change in resistance of 1640 ABC from 2002 to 2010 (TSAR period III to VII) to different antimicrobial agents and identified factors associated with imipenem-resistant and extensively drug-resistant ABC (IRABC and XDRABC).
METHODS: Isolates were collected by TSAR from the same 26 hospitals located in all 4 regions of Taiwan. Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC) were determined by reference broth microdilution method. Isolates nonsusceptible to all tested aminoglycosides, fluoroquinolones, β-lactam, β-lactam/β-lactam inhibitors, and carbapenems were defined as extensively drug-resistant (XDR). Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to assess the relationship between predictor variables among patients with resistant ABC and patients with non-resistant ABC.
RESULTS: The prevalence of IRABC increased from 3.4% in 2002 to 58.7% in 2010 (P < 0.001; odds ratio [OR], 2.138; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.947 to 2.347) and that of XDRABC increased from 1.3% in 2002 to 41.0% in 2010 (P < 0.001; OR, 1.970; 95% CI, 1.773-2.189). The rates of non-susceptibility to other antimicrobial agents remained high (>55%) over the years with some fluctuations before and after TSAR V (2006) on some agents. Multivariate analysis revealed that recovery from elderly patients, origins other than blood, from ICU settings, or geographic regions are independent factors associated with IRABC and XDRABC. Although the prevalence of XDRABC increased in all four regions of Taiwan over the years, central Taiwan had higher prevalence of XDRABC starting in 2008. Susceptibility to polymyxin remained high (99.8%).
CONCLUSIONS: This longitudinal multicenter surveillance program revealed significant increase and nationwide emergence of IRABC and XDRABC in Taiwan over the years. This study also identified factors associated with IRABC and XDRABC to help guide empirical therapy and at-risk groups requiring more intense interventional infection control measures with focused surveillance efforts.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22929085      PMCID: PMC3462144          DOI: 10.1186/1471-2334-12-200

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMC Infect Dis        ISSN: 1471-2334            Impact factor:   3.090


Background

Acinetobacter spp., especially Acinetobacter baumannii complex (ABC), has emerged as an important pathogen causing a variety of infections including urinary tract infection, skin and soft tissue infections, and pneumonia and bloodstream infections with high morbidity and mortality [1]. The ability to chronically colonize patients and cause outbreaks which are usually hard to eradicate poses significant challenge to infection control and increases healthcare expenditure [2]. In addition to its intrinsic resistance to many commonly used antibiotics, this troublesome pathogen can gain additional mechanism rapidly in response to new broad-spectrum antibiotics [3,4]. Due to treatment failure, drug-resistant strains have been associated with higher mortality and prolonged hospital stay compared with susceptible ones [5,6]. Carbapenems such as imipenem and meropenem are the last resort of drugs for the treatment of multidrug-resistant pathogens including ABC. However, the incidence of carbapenem resistance in ABC increased steadily in the 2000s [4,7]. In Europe, the MYSTIC program in 2006 revealed a considerable increase in carbapenem resistance rates to 42.5% [8]. Worldwide, the SENTRY program documented an overall increase in imipenem nonsusceptibility from 34.5% in 2006 to 59.8% in 2009 [9]. Imipenem-resistance in Taiwan ranged from 22% in 2000 to 25% in 2005 [10]. Ampicillin/sulbactam, tigecycline, and colistin are possible options for imipenem-resistant ABC but decreasing susceptibility to these agents has also been reported [1]. Surveillance is therefore important in providing useful information for physicians in choosing empirical antibiotics. It also helps to address specific resistant issues within a region to help identify targeted intervention measures [11,12]. Although there have been reports of the high prevalence of drug-resistant ABC in Taiwan [13,14], longitudinal nationwide surveillance data on isolates from different sources in Taiwan have not been published. The Taiwan Surveillance of Antimicrobial Resistance (TSAR) is a nationwide program at the National Health Research Institutes [11] and has been conducted biennially since 1998 [15]. Using data from TSAR, we aimed at detailing the secular change of resistance to various antimicrobial agents in ABC from different sources over 10 years and identify factors associated with imipenem-resistant and extensively drug-resistant ABC (IRABC and XDRABC).

Methods

Study period and isolate collection process

The study period spanned from 2002 to 2010 (corresponding to TSAR period III to VII). Bacterial isolates were collected biennially from July to September by the TSAR program from the same 26 hospitals except TSAR V (2006), in which one hospital did not participate. These hospitals comprised 11 medical centers and 15 regional hospitals, and are located in all 4 regions of Taiwan including 7, 8, 8, and 3 in the north, central, south and east region, respectively. The majority of the Taiwan’s population lives in the western part (north, central and south regions) while the eastern part is the least populated region. The collection protocol was similar for all 5 rounds of TSAR as described previously [16,17]. Briefly, each hospital first collected 50 outpatient isolates, 30 adult ICU and 100 non-ICU inpatient isolates, and 20 pediatric isolates. After completion of the above collection, an additional 20 (for TSAR III to V) to 50 (for TSAR VI and VII) isolates from blood and sterile body sites were collected. The isolates were collected sequentially without specifying species. All isolates were stored at −80°C for subsequent testing. The bacterial isolates were recovered from clinical samples taken as part of standard care. The study was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of National Health Research Institutes (EC960205).

Bacterial isolates and information

For Acinetobacter spp., isolates were subcultured to blood agar and McConkey agar plates at our laboratory for purity check and to confirm species identification. Either Vitek I (prior to 2008) or Vitek II (2008 and 2010) GN card was used (bioMérieux, Marcy l'Etoile, France). In addition, conventional biochemical tests including oxidase, Triple Sugar Iron, 42°C, malonate, and hemolysis on sheep blood agar were used to aid in confirmation of the A. baumannii complex [18]. The hospital also provided information on specimen source and patient age. For analysis, samples from upper respiratory tract were designated as respiratory origin. Samples from pus/discharge included those from abscesses or wounds.

Antimicrobial susceptibility

Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC) of different agents were determined by reference broth microdilution test following the guidelines of Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) using custom designed Sensititre panels (Trek Diagnostics, West Essex, England) [19] Amikacin, ampicillin/sulbactam, ceftazidime, cefepime, ciprofloxacin, gentamicin, levofloxacin, imipenem, and piperacillin/tazobactam were tested on all isolates from each study year. Polymyxin B and tigecycline were tested on imipenem-resistant isolates in 2002 and 2004 and on all isolates from 2008–2010. Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole was tested on all isolates from 2002, 2004 and 2010. Control strains included Pseudomonas aeruginosa ATCC 27853, Escherichia coli ATCC 25922 and ATCC 35218. Results were interpreted using the CLSI breakpoints except for colistin and tigecycline, for which the EUCAST breakpoints (for Enterobacteriaceae) were used (http://www.eucast.org/clinical_breakpoints). Isolates nonsusceptible to all the tested aminoglycosides, fluoroquinolones, β-lactam, β-lactam/β-lactam inhibitors, and carbapenems were defined as extensively drug-resistant (XDR) [20,21].This is a modification of the ECDC definition for XDR, which is defined as non-susceptibility to at least one agent in all but two or fewer antimicrobial categories [20].

Data and statistical analysis

For analysis of susceptibility rates in different year and patient groups, we used the Whonet software [22]. Univariate analysis was done using Student’s t test/Mann–Whitney U test, or Fisher’s exact tests as appropriate. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to assess the relationship between predictor variables among patients with resistant ABC and patients with non-resistant ABC. The variables included those identified in the univariate analysis as possibly being associated with resistance rate (P < 0.05). For comparison of resistance between regions and specimen types, these variables were entered in the multivariate analysis in a dummy form (resistance rate in northern Taiwan or that of blood samples as the reference group, respectively). For the trend test calculation, a continuous variable (TSAR period III to VII corresponding to 3 to 7, respectively) was used [23]. All analyses were performed with the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences version 18.0 (SPSS, Chicago, IL, USA). A P < 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.

Results

Bacterial isolates

Between 2002 and 2010, a total of 1,681 Acinetobacter spp. isolates were collected and ABC comprised 97.6% (1,640 isolates). Non-ABC isolates were excluded from subsequent data analysis. Among the 1640 ABC isolates, the mean age of patients was 66.8 ± 19.8 years. Table 1 lists the source breakdown of the isolates for each round of TSAR. Isolates were mostly recovered from respiratory samples (822 isolates, 50.1%), followed by blood (244, 14.9%), pus/discharge (219, 13.4%) and urine (216, 13.2%). Seven hundred and thirty-five (44.8%) were from medical centers and 600 (36.6%) were from ICU. Isolates from central Taiwan comprised the largest proportion (627, 38.2%) (Table 1).
Table 1

Source breakdown ofcomplex from the Taiwan Surveillance of Antimicrobial Resistance (TSAR) by year

StrataTSAR III (2002)
TSAR IV (2004)
TSAR V (2006)
TSAR VI (2008)
TSAR VII (2010)
TSAR III-VII Combined
Pa
N%N%N%N%N%N%
Hospital type
 Medical centers (11)
162
54.4
124
47.9
126
41.4
172
41.1
151
41.8
735
44.8
0.002
 Regional hospitals (15)
136
45.6
135
52.1
178
58.6
246
58.9
210
58.2
905
55.2
0.002
Region
 North (7)
90
30.2
70
27.0
76
25.0
118
28.2
118
32.7
472
28.8
0.2354
 Central (8)
94
31.5
91
35.1
109
35.9
189
45.2
144
39.9
627
38.2
0.0024
 South (8)
77
25.8
57
22.0
76
25.0
65
15.6
68
18.8
343
20.9
0.0032
 East (3)
37
12.4
41
15.8
43
14.1
46
11.0
31
8.6
198
12.1
0.0194
Patient location
 ICU
100
33.6
105
40.5
103
33.9
157
37.6
135
37.4
600
36.6
0.3848
 Non-ICU
174
58.4
138
53.3
165
54.3
227
54.3
201
55.7
905
55.2
0.7578
 OPD/ER
24
8.1
16
6.2
36
11.8
34
8.1
25
6.9
135
8.2
0.1104
Specimen type
 Respiratory
157
52.7
136
52.5
137
45.1
208
49.8
184
51.0
822
50.1
0.3294
 Blood
33
11.1
28
10.8
34
11.2
84
20.1
65
18.0
244
14.9
0.0002
 Pus/discharge
49
16.4
40
15.4
56
18.4
40
9.6
34
9.4
219
13.4
0.0005
 Urine
34
11.4
30
11.6
50
16.4
57
13.6
45
12.5
216
13.2
0.332
 Others
25
8.4
25
9.7
27
8.9
29
6.9
33
9.1
139
8.5
0.7321
Total2982593044183611640 

aThe differences of hospital types, regions, patient locations, and specimen types among TSAR III to VII were compared using Pearson's chi-squared test.

Source breakdown ofcomplex from the Taiwan Surveillance of Antimicrobial Resistance (TSAR) by year aThe differences of hospital types, regions, patient locations, and specimen types among TSAR III to VII were compared using Pearson's chi-squared test.

Changes in non-susceptibility to different antimicrobial agents over the years

Rates of non-susceptibility to different antimicrobial agents between 2002 and 2010 are shown in Table 2. The secular trend of non-susceptibility to amikacin, ceftazidime, levofloxacin, and imipenem over the 10 years is also shown in Figure 1 to highlight the sharp increase of carbapenem (imipenem) non-susceptibility from 3.4% in 2002 to 58.7% in 2010 (P < 0.001; odds ratio [OR], 2.138; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.947 to 2.347). The increased carbapenem-resistance was observed in isolates from elderly as well as non-elderly patients, and in those from different specimen types, ICU and non-ICU patients, and throughout different regions of Taiwan (Figure 2).
Table 2

Secular trend of antimicrobial non-susceptibility incomplex from the 2002 to 2010 Taiwan Surveillance of Antimicrobial Resistance (TSAR) program

Antimicrobial agentsaResistance rate (%) by year
2002 to 2006b
2006 to 2010
2002 (298)2004 (259)2006 (304)2008 (418)2010 (361)POR95% CIPOR95% CI
Amikacin
63.1
68
70.7
66.5
64.3
0.046
1.19
1.003-1.411
0.081
0.865
0.735-1.018
Amp/Sulb
57.4
64.1
57.6
61.5
59.6
0.971
1.003
0.852-1.180
0.637
1.038
0.889-1.212
Cefepime
64.1
70.7
74
71.3
60.9
0.008
1.265
1.062-1.507
<0.001
0.731
0.619-0.864
Ceftazidime
68.1
73.4
76.6
74.6
70.4
0.019
1.241
1.036-1.486
0.063
0.848
0.712-1.009
Ciprofloxacin
68.8
75.3
76
75.4
75.3
0.047
1.202
1.002-1.441
0.853
0.983
0.824-1.174
Gentamicin
73.5
78.8
76.6
70.3
72.9
0.367
1.09
0.904-1.315
0.311
0.915
0.770-1.087
Imipenem
3.4
18.1
31.6
51.4
58.7
<0.001
3.043
2.348-3.944
<0.001
1.732
1.478-2.029
Levofloxacin
66.1
72.6
74.3
73.9
71.2
0.027
1.222
1.023-1.458
0.349
0.921
0.775-1.094
Pip/Tazo
62.8
76.8
75.3
74.6
68.4
0.001
1.363
1.139-1.631
0.041
0.835
0.703-0.992
TMP/SMX73.875.7NTcNT71.5NDd  ND  

aAmp/Sulb, Ampicillin/sulbactam; Pip/Tazo, Piperacillin/tazobactam; TMP/SMX, trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole.

bOR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval.

cNT, not tested.

dND, not done.

Figure 1

Rapid increase of imipenem-resistance incomplex (OR 2.277; 95% CI, 2.054-2.523; < 0.001) in Taiwan based on the Taiwan Surveillance of Antimicrobial Resistance (TSAR) data. The secular trends of resistance to 4 other agents are shown for comparison.

Figure 2

Secular trend of imipenem-resistance rate incomplex recovered from 2002 to 2010 in Taiwan. Differences in resistance rates were stratified by (a) patient age, (b) sample origins, (c) healthcare settings, and (d) geographic regions, based on the Taiwan Surveillance of Antimicrobial Resistance (TSAR) data.

Secular trend of antimicrobial non-susceptibility incomplex from the 2002 to 2010 Taiwan Surveillance of Antimicrobial Resistance (TSAR) program aAmp/Sulb, Ampicillin/sulbactam; Pip/Tazo, Piperacillin/tazobactam; TMP/SMX, trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole. bOR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval. cNT, not tested. dND, not done. Rapid increase of imipenem-resistance incomplex (OR 2.277; 95% CI, 2.054-2.523; < 0.001) in Taiwan based on the Taiwan Surveillance of Antimicrobial Resistance (TSAR) data. The secular trends of resistance to 4 other agents are shown for comparison. Secular trend of imipenem-resistance rate incomplex recovered from 2002 to 2010 in Taiwan. Differences in resistance rates were stratified by (a) patient age, (b) sample origins, (c) healthcare settings, and (d) geographic regions, based on the Taiwan Surveillance of Antimicrobial Resistance (TSAR) data. The rates of non-susceptibility to other antimicrobial agents remained high (>55%) over the years although fluctuations were observed before and after TSAR V (2006) on some agents (Table 2 & Figure 1); non-susceptibility to amikacin, cefepime, ceftazidime, levofloxacin, and piperacillin/tazobactam increased significantly before 2006 (TSAR V), then stayed at a plateau and even declined thereafter (Table 2). In contrast, the rates of non-susceptibility to ampicillin/sulbactam (range 56.1% - 64.1%) fluctuated over 10 years without significant change (P = 0.775; OR, 1.010; 95% CI, 0.942 to 1.084), while that of gentamicin decreased slightly since 2004 (P = 0.034; OR, 0.883; 95% CI, 0.787 to 0.991). The overall rate of susceptibility to tigecycline (MIC < = 2 mg/L) and polymyxin B was 97.7% and 99.8%, respectively in 1,160 tested isolates and 98.1% and 100%, respectively in IRABC.

Factors associated with emergence of imipenem-resistant A. baumannii complex (IRABC)

Table 3 presents the factors associated with the emergence of IRABC. Isolates from elderly patients (> 65 years old), respiratory tract origin, ICU settings, or central Taiwan were significantly associated with imipenem resistance whereas rates of imipenem-resistance were lower in isolates from blood or pus/discharge, medical centers, southern or northern Taiwan (Figure 2). Multivariate analysis revealed recovery from elderly patients, origins other than blood, ICU settings, geographic region, and latter collection year remained independent factors (Table 3).
Table 3

Factors associated with imipenem-resistantcomplex (IRABC) in Taiwan

CharacteristicNon-IRABCIRABCPaORb95% CIbPb
Number
1060
580
 
 
 
 
 Mean age ± SDc
65.0 ± 20.2
70.0 ± 18.8
<0.001
 
 
 
 Age 65 and olderc
629 (61.1)
401 (71.9)
<0.001
1.464
1.122-1.912
0.005
Specimen types
 Respiratory tracts
481 (45.4)
341 (58.8)
<0.001
2.597
1.888-3.570
<0.001
 Blood
192 (18.1)
52 (9.0)
<0.001
 
 
Reference
 Pus/discharge
160 (15.1)
59 (10.2)
0.005
1.934
1.240-3.018
0.004
 Urine
140 (13.2)
76 (13.1)
>0.99
2.138
1.401-3.263
<0.001
Healthcare settings
 Medical centers
507 (47.8)
228 (39.3)
0.001
0.814
0.631-1.049
0.112
 ICU Settings
328 (30.9)
272 (46.9)
<0.001
1.919
1.482-2.486
<0.001
Geographic regions
 Northern
336 (31.7)
136 (23.4)
<0.001
 
 
Reference
 Central
341 (32.2)
286 (49.3)
<0.001
2.43
1.791-3.296
<0.001
 Southern
258 (24.3)
85 (14.7)
<0.001
1.178
0.812-1.710
0.388
 Eastern
125 (11.8)
73 (12.6)
0.635
2.24
1.489-3.370
<0.001
TSAR periodd   2.2772.054-2.523<0.001

aP value by chi-square test.

bP value by multivariate analysis; OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval.

cThe patient ages for 50 patients were unknown.

dTaiwan Surveillance of Antimicrobial Resistance (TSAR) III (2002) to VII (2010).

Factors associated with imipenem-resistantcomplex (IRABC) in Taiwan aP value by chi-square test. bP value by multivariate analysis; OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval. cThe patient ages for 50 patients were unknown. dTaiwan Surveillance of Antimicrobial Resistance (TSAR) III (2002) to VII (2010).

Emergence of extensively drug-resistant A. baumannii complex (XDRABC)

The prevalence of XDRABC increased significantly from 1.3% in 2002 to 41.0% in 2010, respectively (P <0.001; OR, 1.970; 95% CI, 1.773-2.189), with an overall prevalence of 26.1% (428 isolates) over the 10 years. The increased XDRABC also occurred in isolates from elderly and non-elderly patients both, and in those from different specimen types, ICU as well as non-ICU patients, while central region saw a sharp increase of XDRABC in 2008–2010 (Figure 3). Ten (2.3%) of the XDRABC had tigecycline > 2 mg/L and all were susceptible to polymyxin B. Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole was tested on 187 XDRABC isolates and all but 4 were resistant.
Figure 3

Secular trend of extensively drug-resistance rate incomplex recovered from 2002 to 2010 in Taiwan. Differences in resistance rates were stratified by (a) patient age (b) sample origins (c) healthcare settings (d) geographic regions based on the Taiwan Surveillance of Antimicrobial Resistance (TSAR) data.

Secular trend of extensively drug-resistance rate incomplex recovered from 2002 to 2010 in Taiwan. Differences in resistance rates were stratified by (a) patient age (b) sample origins (c) healthcare settings (d) geographic regions based on the Taiwan Surveillance of Antimicrobial Resistance (TSAR) data.

Factors associated with emergence of XDRABC

Factors associated with XDRABC strains included recovery from elderly patients (> 65 years old), respiratory tract origin, ICU settings, or central Taiwan (Table 4). The extensively drug-resistant rates over 10 years stratified by these independent factors are shown in Figure 3. Isolates from blood or pus/discharge, medical center, southern or northern Taiwan were less likely to be XDR. The independent factors associated with XDRABC included recovery from elderly patients, origins other than blood, ICU settings, geographic region, and latter collection year (Table 4).
Table 4

Factors associated with extensively drug-resistantcomplex (XDRABC) in Taiwan

CharacteristicNon-XDRABCXDRABCPaORb95% CIbPb
Number
1212
428
 
 
 
 
 Mean age ± SDc
65.4 ± 20.2
70.6 ± 18.1
<0.001
 
 
 
 Age 65 and olderc
733 (71.2)
297 (28.8)
<0.001
1.39
1.052-1.836
0.021
Specimens
 Respiratory tracts
571 (47.1)
251 (58.6)
<0.001
2.102
1.507-2.932
<0.001
 Blood
210 (17.3)
34 (7.9)
<0.001
 
 
Reference
 Pus/discharge
176 (14.5)
43 (10.0)
0.02
1.598
0.996-2.568
0.052
 Urine
160 (13.2)
56 (13.1)
>0.99
1.759
1.130-2.739
0.012
Healthcare settings
 Medical centers
570 (47.0)
165 (38.6)
0.003
0.804
0.617-1.046
0.104
 ICU settings
404 (33.3)
196 (45.8)
<0.001
1.468
1.126-1.915
0.005
Geographic regions
 Northern
365 (30.1)
107 (25.0)
0.047
 
 
Reference
 Central
404 (33.3)
223 (52.1)
<0.001
1.965
1.466-2.671
<0.001
 Southern
290 (23.9)
53 (12.4)
<0.001
0.814
0.544-1.216
0.314
 Eastern
153 (12.6)
45 (10.5)
0.263
1.303
0.847-2.006
0.229
TSAR periodd   1.971.773-2.189<0.001

aP value by chi-square test.

bP value by multivariate analysis; OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval.

cThe patient ages of 50 patients were unknown.

dTaiwan Surveillance of Antimicrobial Resistance (TSAR) III (2002) to VII (2010).

Factors associated with extensively drug-resistantcomplex (XDRABC) in Taiwan aP value by chi-square test. bP value by multivariate analysis; OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval. cThe patient ages of 50 patients were unknown. dTaiwan Surveillance of Antimicrobial Resistance (TSAR) III (2002) to VII (2010).

Discussion

This nationwide longitudinal study of 1,640 ABC over 10 years revealed the continuous increase of non-susceptibility to imipenem and emergence of XDRABC. For most other antibiotics, resistance rate increased from 2002 to 2006 but ceased to increase or even decreased thereafter. The prevalence of IRABC and XDRABC was independently affected by age of patients, specimen types, healthcare settings, and geographic regions. Resistance to imipenem, which is often accompanied with resistance to multiple other agents, has increased in all parts of the world, ranging from 14.1% in Europe to 39.4% in Latin America in 2004–2006 [24], and from 34.5% in 2006 to 59.8% in 2009 overall worldwide [9]. Our study revealed the rapid increase in the prevalence of imipenem-resistance over 10 years in Taiwan, from 3.4% in 2002 to 58.7% in 2010. The imipenem-nonsusceptible rate of 62.6% in isolates from Asia-Pacific in 2009 reported by the SENTRY study was comparable to our result [9]. Although XDRABC in Taiwan has been observed in other pilot studies [10,14], this is the first study addressing the emergence of XDRABC in Taiwan over a long period. However, the variety of definition regarding XDR precluded the comparison of our data with previous ones. The definition of XDR in our study was in accordance to that of Tan et al. [21] and approached the consensus of European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control [20] except that not all isolates were tested for trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole. However, almost all of XDRABC tested showed resistance to it. Prolonged hospitalization, ICU stay, invasive medical procedures, and prior broad-spectrum antibiotic use, especially carbapenem, third-generation cephalosporins, and fluoroquinolones, have been shown to be risk factors for acquisition of IRABC [4,7,25]. These factors, as well as clonal dissemination [26,27], likely all contributed to the increased prevalence of IRABC and XDRABC in Taiwan over the years. A recent study found carbapenem use in Taiwan hospitals increased by 86% between 2003 and 2008, which was significantly associated with increased healthcare associated IRABC infections [28]. The same study also found that the largest increase in carbapenem use occurred in the central region, the area we found the highest prevalence of IRABC and XDRABC. Strain variability and differences in oxacillinase distribution [26,27] may also account for regional differences and the changes in resistance after 2006, and remain to be investigated. Based on the independent associated factors we identified, the prevalence of imipenem-resistance and XDRABC varied greatly. To our knowledge, variations in resistance profiles among ABC from different sample origins have rarely been addressed before. Whether the lower resistance of isolates from blood compared to other sample origins resulted from different clonality and/or impaired virulence in the cost of resistance [29] remained to be elucidated. Varied prevalence among different areas and healthcare settings (ICU) in Asia has been observed [10]. The insignificant difference between medical centers and regional hospitals may have resulted from frequent transportation of patients and high density of hospitals in Taiwan. The advanced age may imply the underlying conditions of the patients. Higher prevalence of IRABC and XDRABC in ICU and regional variations within Taiwan likely reflect differences in patient populations and antibiotic use [28,30]. The rate of resistance to polymyxin B in our study was only 0.2%, which is similar to that found in isolates from the Asia-Western Pacific region between 2006 and 2009 [9]. In contrast, one study in Korea reported a resistance rate of 18.1% [31]. As for tigecycline, 0.2% of IRABC isolates had MIC > 2 mg/L in Asia region [32] whereas our study found it to be 1.9% in Taiwan. Susceptibility to polymyxin remained high even for the XDRABC isolates in our study. However, in a pilot study by Jean et al., [14], the authors reported higher rate of resistance to colistin and tigecycline in Taiwan. The source of isolates differed in the two studies. Ours were from different patient groups of both teaching and regional hospitals while theirs were from ICUs of ten major teaching hospitals. The underlying conditions, disease severity, and amount of colistin and tigecycline used would be different. However, both studies revealed that compared to other antibiotics, tigecycline and polymyxin B (or its less toxic derivatives, colistin) remained an in vitro effective antimicrobial agent for the treatment of IRABC or XDRABC in Taiwan.

Conclusion

This longitudinal multicenter surveillance program revealed significant increase and nationwide emergence of IRABC and XDRABC in Taiwan despite that non-susceptibility to other antibiotics remained stable or declined over the past 6 years. This study also identified factors associated with their resistance to help guide empirical therapy and at-risk groups requiring more intense interventional infection control measures with focused surveillance efforts.

Abbreviations

IRABC, Imipenem-Resistant Acinetobacter baumannii Complex; XDRABC, Extensively Drug-Resistant Acinetobacter baumannii Complex.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors' contributions

SCK performed data analysis and interpretation, and drafted the manuscript. SCC participated in the design and data interpretation of the study and helped to finalize the manuscript. HYW, JFL, PCC, YRS and IWH carried out the laboratory assays and participated in data analysis. TLL designed and supervised the study, participated in data analysis and interpretation, and finalized the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Pre-publication history

The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here: http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2334/12/200/prepub
  30 in total

1.  Surveillance of antibiotic resistance in Taiwan, 1998.

Authors:  M Ho; L C McDonald; T L Lauderdale; L L Yeh; P C Chen; Y R Shiau
Journal:  J Microbiol Immunol Infect       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 4.399

2.  Multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter: a threat to the antibiotic era.

Authors:  A Y Peleg; D L Paterson
Journal:  Intern Med J       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 2.048

Review 3.  Global challenge of multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii.

Authors:  Federico Perez; Andrea M Hujer; Kristine M Hujer; Brooke K Decker; Philip N Rather; Robert A Bonomo
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2007-07-23       Impact factor: 5.191

4.  Surveillance of antimicrobial resistance: the WHONET program.

Authors:  J M Stelling; T F O'Brien
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 9.079

5.  Impact of imipenem resistance on mortality in patients with Acinetobacter bacteraemia.

Authors:  Ki Tae Kwon; Won Sup Oh; Jae-Hoon Song; Hyun-Ha Chang; Sook-In Jung; Shin-Woo Kim; Seong Yeol Ryu; Sang Taek Heo; Dong Sik Jung; Ji-Young Rhee; Sang Yop Shin; Kwan Soo Ko; Kyong Ran Peck; Nam Yong Lee
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2007-01-09       Impact factor: 5.790

Review 6.  Risk factors for the isolation of multi-drug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii and Pseudomonas aeruginosa: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  M E Falagas; P Kopterides
Journal:  J Hosp Infect       Date:  2006-07-05       Impact factor: 3.926

7.  Emergence and dissemination of blaOXA-23-carrying imipenem-resistant Acinetobacter sp in a regional hospital in Taiwan.

Authors:  Ming-Feng Lin; Han-Yueh Kuo; Hui-Wen Yeh; Chih-Man Yang; Chih-Hung Sung; Chi-Chao Tu; Mei-Luan Huang; Ming-Li Liou
Journal:  J Microbiol Immunol Infect       Date:  2011-01-12       Impact factor: 4.399

8.  High rates of resistance to colistin and polymyxin B in subgroups of Acinetobacter baumannii isolates from Korea.

Authors:  Kwan Soo Ko; Ji Yoeun Suh; Ki Tae Kwon; Sook-In Jung; Kyong-Hwa Park; Cheol In Kang; Doo Ryeon Chung; Kyong Ran Peck; Jae-Hoon Song
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2007-08-29       Impact factor: 5.790

9.  Multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter infection mortality rate and length of hospitalization.

Authors:  Rebecca H Sunenshine; Marc-Oliver Wright; Lisa L Maragakis; Anthony D Harris; Xiaoyan Song; Joan Hebden; Sara E Cosgrove; Ashley Anderson; Jennifer Carnell; Daniel B Jernigan; David G Kleinbaum; Trish M Perl; Harold C Standiford; Arjun Srinivasan
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 6.883

10.  Antimicrobial susceptibility among organisms from the Asia/Pacific Rim, Europe and Latin and North America collected as part of TEST and the in vitro activity of tigecycline.

Authors:  Ralf Rene Reinert; Donald E Low; Flávia Rossi; Xiaojiang Zhang; Chand Wattal; Michael J Dowzicky
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2007-09-13       Impact factor: 5.790

View more
  41 in total

1.  A 4-year surveillance of antimicrobial resistance patterns of Acinetobacter baumanni in a university-affiliated hospital in China.

Authors:  Ting Xu; Wenying Xia; Guodong Rong; Shiyang Pan; Peijun Huang; Bing Gu
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 2.  Clinical and Pathophysiological Overview of Acinetobacter Infections: a Century of Challenges.

Authors:  Darren Wong; Travis B Nielsen; Robert A Bonomo; Paul Pantapalangkoor; Brian Luna; Brad Spellberg
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 26.132

3.  Antimicrobial photodynamic therapy against clinical isolates of carbapenem-susceptible and carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii.

Authors:  Mirian Marcolan De Mello; Patrícia Pimentel De Barros; Renata de Cassia Bernardes; Silvio Rubens Alves; Naiara Pires Ramanzini; Lívia Mara Alves Figueiredo-Godoi; Ana Carolina Chipoletti Prado; Antonio Olavo Cardoso Jorge; Juliana Campos Junqueira
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2019-03-20       Impact factor: 3.161

4.  Molecular Epidemiology of Emerging blaOXA-23-Like- and blaOXA-24-Like-Carrying Acinetobacter baumannii in Taiwan.

Authors:  Shu-Chen Kuo; Wei-Cheng Huang; Tzu-Wen Huang; Hui-Ying Wang; Jui-Fen Lai; Te-Li Chen; Tsai-Ling Lauderdale
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2018-02-23       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 5.  Antimicrobial resistance in Acinetobacter baumannii: From bench to bedside.

Authors:  Ming-Feng Lin; Chung-Yu Lan
Journal:  World J Clin Cases       Date:  2014-12-16       Impact factor: 1.337

Review 6.  Code blue: Acinetobacter baumannii, a nosocomial pathogen with a role in the oral cavity.

Authors:  A M Richards; Y Abu Kwaik; R J Lamont
Journal:  Mol Oral Microbiol       Date:  2014-09-27       Impact factor: 3.563

7.  The Asp20-to-Asn Substitution in the Response Regulator AdeR Leads to Enhanced Efflux Activity of AdeB in Acinetobacter baumannii.

Authors:  Jennifer Nowak; Thamarai Schneiders; Harald Seifert; Paul G Higgins
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2015-12-07       Impact factor: 5.191

8.  In Vivo and In Vitro Efficacy of Minocycline-Based Combination Therapy for Minocycline-Resistant Acinetobacter baumannii.

Authors:  Ya-Sung Yang; Yi Lee; Kuo-Chuan Tseng; Wei-Cheng Huang; Ming-Fen Chuang; Shu-Chen Kuo; Tsai-Ling Yang Lauderdale; Te-Li Chen
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2016-06-20       Impact factor: 5.191

9.  In vitro activity of imipenem/relebactam, meropenem/vaborbactam, ceftazidime/avibactam, cefepime/zidebactam and other novel antibiotics against imipenem-non-susceptible Gram-negative bacilli from Taiwan.

Authors:  Shu-Chen Kuo; Yung-Chih Wang; Mei-Chen Tan; Wei-Cheng Huang; Yih-Ru Shiau; Hui-Ying Wang; Jui-Fen Lai; I-Wen Huang; Tsai-Ling Lauderdale
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2021-07-15       Impact factor: 5.790

10.  Antimicrobial Resistance Mechanisms and Virulence of Colistin- and Carbapenem-Resistant Acinetobacter baumannii Isolated from a Teaching Hospital in Taiwan.

Authors:  Noor Andryan Ilsan; Yuarn-Jang Lee; Shu-Chen Kuo; I-Hui Lee; Tzu-Wen Huang
Journal:  Microorganisms       Date:  2021-06-14
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.