PURPOSE: To characterize fast and slow diffusion components in diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DW-MRI) of pediatric Crohn's disease (CD). Overall diffusivity reduction as measured by the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) in patients with CD has been previously demonstrated. However, the ADC reduction may be due to changes in either fast or slow diffusion components. In this study we distinguished between the fast and slow diffusion components in the DW-MRI signal decay of pediatric CD. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We acquired MRI from 24 patients, including MR enterography (MRE) and DW-MRI with 8 b-values (0-800 s/mm(2)). We characterized fast and slow diffusivity by intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) model parameters (f, D*, D), and overall diffusivity by ADC values. We determined which model best described the DW-MRI signal decay. We assessed the influence of the IVIM model parameters on the ADC. We evaluated differences in model parameter values between the enhancing and nonenhancing groups. RESULTS: The IVIM model described the observed data significantly better than the ADC model (P = 0.0088). The ADC was correlated with f (r = 0.67, P = 0.0003), but not with D (r = 0.39, P = 0.062) and D* (r = -0.39, P = 0.057). f values were significantly lower (P < 0.003) and D* values were significantly higher (P = 0.03) in the enhancing segments, while D values were not significantly different between the groups (P = 0.14). CONCLUSION: For this study population the IVIM model provides a better description of the DW-MRI signal decay than the ADC model. The reduced ADC is related to changes in the fast diffusion rather than to changes in the slow diffusion.
PURPOSE: To characterize fast and slow diffusion components in diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DW-MRI) of pediatric Crohn's disease (CD). Overall diffusivity reduction as measured by the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) in patients with CD has been previously demonstrated. However, the ADC reduction may be due to changes in either fast or slow diffusion components. In this study we distinguished between the fast and slow diffusion components in the DW-MRI signal decay of pediatric CD. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We acquired MRI from 24 patients, including MR enterography (MRE) and DW-MRI with 8 b-values (0-800 s/mm(2)). We characterized fast and slow diffusivity by intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) model parameters (f, D*, D), and overall diffusivity by ADC values. We determined which model best described the DW-MRI signal decay. We assessed the influence of the IVIM model parameters on the ADC. We evaluated differences in model parameter values between the enhancing and nonenhancing groups. RESULTS: The IVIM model described the observed data significantly better than the ADC model (P = 0.0088). The ADC was correlated with f (r = 0.67, P = 0.0003), but not with D (r = 0.39, P = 0.062) and D* (r = -0.39, P = 0.057). f values were significantly lower (P < 0.003) and D* values were significantly higher (P = 0.03) in the enhancing segments, while D values were not significantly different between the groups (P = 0.14). CONCLUSION: For this study population the IVIM model provides a better description of the DW-MRI signal decay than the ADC model. The reduced ADC is related to changes in the fast diffusion rather than to changes in the slow diffusion.
Authors: Conor G Loftus; Edward V Loftus; W Scott Harmsen; Alan R Zinsmeister; William J Tremaine; L Joseph Melton; William J Sandborn Journal: Inflamm Bowel Dis Date: 2007-03 Impact factor: 5.325
Authors: Vahid Taimouri; Onur Afacan; Jeannette M Perez-Rossello; Michael J Callahan; Robert V Mulkern; Simon K Warfield; Moti Freiman Journal: Med Phys Date: 2015-04 Impact factor: 4.071
Authors: Moti Freiman; Jeannette M Perez-Rossello; Michael J Callahan; Stephan D Voss; Kirsten Ecklund; Robert V Mulkern; Simon K Warfield Journal: Med Image Anal Date: 2013-01-03 Impact factor: 8.545
Authors: Onur Afacan; Ali Gholipour; Robert V Mulkern; Carol E Barnewolt; Judy A Estroff; Susan A Connolly; Richard B Parad; Sigrid Bairdain; Simon K Warfield Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2016-05-09 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Christian Eberhardt; Moritz C Wurnig; Andrea Wirsching; Cristina Rossi; Markus Rottmar; Pinar S Özbay; Lukas Filli; Mickael Lesurtel; Andreas Boss Journal: MAGMA Date: 2016-04-19 Impact factor: 2.310
Authors: Sila Kurugol; Moti Freiman; Onur Afacan; Jeannette M Perez-Rossello; Michael J Callahan; Simon K Warfield Journal: Med Image Anal Date: 2016-04-01 Impact factor: 8.545