PURPOSE: To assess the construct validity of the Thai EuroQoL (EQ-5D) among an occupational population in Thailand. METHODS: Data were derived from a large cohort study among employees of the Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand. In 2008 and 2009, 4,850 participants completed the Thai EQ-5D and Short-Form 36 version 2 (SF-36v2). Thai preferences weights were used to convert EQ-5D health states into EQ-5D index scores. Construct validity of the Thai EQ-5D was examined by specifying and testing hypotheses about the relationships between the EQ-5D, SF-36v2, and participants' demographic and medical characteristics. RESULTS: Construct validity of the Thai EQ-5D was supported by expected relationships with SF-36v2 scale and summary scores. For example, SF-36v2 scores on the mental health scale were much lower for participants who reported having problems on the EQ-5D anxiety/depression dimension compared to those reporting no problems (mean norm-based SF-36v2 scores: 52.9 vs. 41.8, p < 0.001). Additionally, reporting a problem in a given EQ-5D dimension was generally associated with lower SF-36v2 summary scores. The EQ-5D index score distinguished between groups of participants in the expected manner, on the basis of sex, age, education and self-reported health, thus providing evidence of known-groups validity. CONCLUSION: The study demonstrated good construct validity of the Thai EQ-5D in a large occupational population in Thailand.
PURPOSE: To assess the construct validity of the Thai EuroQoL (EQ-5D) among an occupational population in Thailand. METHODS: Data were derived from a large cohort study among employees of the Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand. In 2008 and 2009, 4,850 participants completed the Thai EQ-5D and Short-Form 36 version 2 (SF-36v2). Thai preferences weights were used to convert EQ-5D health states into EQ-5D index scores. Construct validity of the Thai EQ-5D was examined by specifying and testing hypotheses about the relationships between the EQ-5D, SF-36v2, and participants' demographic and medical characteristics. RESULTS: Construct validity of the Thai EQ-5D was supported by expected relationships with SF-36v2 scale and summary scores. For example, SF-36v2 scores on the mental health scale were much lower for participants who reported having problems on the EQ-5D anxiety/depression dimension compared to those reporting no problems (mean norm-based SF-36v2 scores: 52.9 vs. 41.8, p < 0.001). Additionally, reporting a problem in a given EQ-5D dimension was generally associated with lower SF-36v2 summary scores. The EQ-5D index score distinguished between groups of participants in the expected manner, on the basis of sex, age, education and self-reported health, thus providing evidence of known-groups validity. CONCLUSION: The study demonstrated good construct validity of the Thai EQ-5D in a large occupational population in Thailand.
Authors: Yuji Okura; Lynn H Urban; Douglas W Mahoney; Steven J Jacobsen; Richard J Rodeheffer Journal: J Clin Epidemiol Date: 2004-10 Impact factor: 6.437
Authors: Nantasit Luangasanatip; Stefan Flasche; David A B Dance; Direk Limmathurotsakul; Bart J Currie; Chiranjay Mukhopadhyay; Tim Atkins; Richard Titball; Mark Jit Journal: BMC Med Date: 2019-07-05 Impact factor: 8.775
Authors: Husna Ahmad Ainuddin; Muhammad Hibatullah Romli; Tengku Aizan Hamid; Mazatulfazura S F Salim; Lynette Mackenzie Journal: Front Public Health Date: 2021-03-03
Authors: Mahham Shafiq; Alan Yean Yip Fong; E Shyong Tai; Ei Ei Khaing Nang; Hwee Lin Wee; John Adam; Mark Woodward; Piyamitr Sritara; Richie Poulton; Rody Sy; Kavita Venkataraman Journal: Int J Epidemiol Date: 2018-10-01 Impact factor: 7.196