BACKGROUND: Approximately one in five patients with giant cell tumor of bone presents with a pathologic fracture. However, recurrence rates after resection or curettage differ substantially in the literature and it is unclear when curettage is reasonable after fracture. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We therefore determined: (1) local recurrence rates after curettage with adjuvants or en bloc resection; (2) complication rates after both surgical techniques and whether fracture healing occurred after curettage with adjuvants; and (3) function after both treatment modalities for giant cell tumor of bone with a pathologic fracture. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 48 patients with fracture from among 422 patients treated between 1981 and 2009. The primary treatment was resection in 25 and curettage with adjuvants in 23 patients. Minimum followup was 27 months (mean, 101 months; range, 27-293 months). RESULTS: Recurrence rate was higher after curettage with adjuvants when compared with resection (30% versus 0%). Recurrence risk appears higher with soft tissue extension. The complication rate was lower after curettage with adjuvants when compared with resection (4% versus 16%) and included aseptic loosening of prosthesis, allograft failure, and pseudoarthrosis. Tumor and fracture characteristics did not increase complication risk. Fracture healing occurred in 24 of 25 patients. Mean Musculoskeletal Tumor Society score was higher after curettage with adjuvants (mean, 28; range, 23-30; n = 18) when compared with resection (mean, 25; range, 13-30; n = 25). CONCLUSIONS: Our observations suggest curettage with adjuvants is a reasonable option for giant cell tumor of bone with pathologic fractures. Resection should be considered with soft tissue extension, fracture through a local recurrence, or when structural integrity cannot be regained after reconstruction. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, therapeutic study. See Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
BACKGROUND: Approximately one in five patients with giant cell tumor of bone presents with a pathologic fracture. However, recurrence rates after resection or curettage differ substantially in the literature and it is unclear when curettage is reasonable after fracture. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We therefore determined: (1) local recurrence rates after curettage with adjuvants or en bloc resection; (2) complication rates after both surgical techniques and whether fracture healing occurred after curettage with adjuvants; and (3) function after both treatment modalities for giant cell tumor of bone with a pathologic fracture. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 48 patients with fracture from among 422 patients treated between 1981 and 2009. The primary treatment was resection in 25 and curettage with adjuvants in 23 patients. Minimum followup was 27 months (mean, 101 months; range, 27-293 months). RESULTS: Recurrence rate was higher after curettage with adjuvants when compared with resection (30% versus 0%). Recurrence risk appears higher with soft tissue extension. The complication rate was lower after curettage with adjuvants when compared with resection (4% versus 16%) and included aseptic loosening of prosthesis, allograft failure, and pseudoarthrosis. Tumor and fracture characteristics did not increase complication risk. Fracture healing occurred in 24 of 25 patients. Mean Musculoskeletal Tumor Society score was higher after curettage with adjuvants (mean, 28; range, 23-30; n = 18) when compared with resection (mean, 25; range, 13-30; n = 25). CONCLUSIONS: Our observations suggest curettage with adjuvants is a reasonable option for giant cell tumor of bone with pathologic fractures. Resection should be considered with soft tissue extension, fracture through a local recurrence, or when structural integrity cannot be regained after reconstruction. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, therapeutic study. See Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Authors: Jan H N Lindeman; Roeland Hanemaaijer; Adri Mulder; P D Sander Dijkstra; Károly Szuhai; Dieter Bromme; Jan H Verheijen; Pancras C W Hogendoorn Journal: Am J Pathol Date: 2004-08 Impact factor: 4.307
Authors: R J O'Donnell; D S Springfield; H K Motwani; J E Ready; M C Gebhardt; H J Mankin Journal: J Bone Joint Surg Am Date: 1994-12 Impact factor: 5.284
Authors: Lizz van der Heijden; P D Sander Dijkstra; Michiel A J van de Sande; Judith R Kroep; Remi A Nout; Carla S P van Rijswijk; Judith V M G Bovée; Pancras C W Hogendoorn; Hans Gelderblom Journal: Oncologist Date: 2014-04-09
Authors: Jose I Albergo; German L Farfalli; Angeles Cabas-Geat; Pablo Roitman; Miguel A Ayerza; Luis A Aponte-Tinao Journal: Clin Orthop Relat Res Date: 2020-11 Impact factor: 4.755