Literature DB >> 22926358

AO group, AO subgroup, Garden and Pauwels classification systems of femoral neck fractures: are they reliable and reproducible?

Drago Gašpar1, Tomislav Crnković, Dražen Durović, Dinko Podsednik, Ferdinand Slišurić.   

Abstract

AIM: To determine which of the classification systems for the femoral neck fracture between AO group, AO subgroup, Garden and Pauwels is much more reliable and reproducible to predict a method of treatment, radiological prediction of nonunion and prediction of outcomes.
METHODS: Five observers classified 77 randomly selected anterior- posterior (AP) and lateral view preoperative radiographs of the femoral neck fractures according to AO group, AO subgroup, Garden and Pauwels classification systems. The procedure was repeated on the same radiographs after three months. First classification is used to calculate interobserver agreement by kappa value between observers, while the first and second classification has served to calculate intraobserver kappa value for each examiner.
RESULTS: Overall mean for classification system for interobserver agreement is: AO 0.44, AO subgroup 0.17, Garden 0.41 and Pauwels 0.19. Mean intraobserver agreement for AO group was 0.56, AO subgroup 0.38, Garden 0.49 and Pauwels 0.38 coefficient kappa value.
CONCLUSION: Garden and AO group are useful for the division of femoral neck fractures without displacement and with displacement, but they are not for clinical use. AO subgroup and Pauwels classification are not recommended for further use.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22926358

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Glas (Zenica)        ISSN: 1840-0132


  9 in total

Review 1.  Classifications in Brief: Garden Classification of Femoral Neck Fractures.

Authors:  Jillian M Kazley; Samik Banerjee; Mostafa M Abousayed; Andrew J Rosenbaum
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 2.  Tips and tricks for ORIF of displaced femoral neck fractures in the young adult patient.

Authors:  Stephen C Stacey; Christopher H Renninger; David Hak; Cyril Mauffrey
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2016-03-10

3.  Mechanical analysis of femoral neck fracture fixation with dynamic condylar screw in synthetic bone.

Authors:  Anderson Freitas; Rafael Almeida Maciel; Renato De Almeida Lima; Diogo Ranier De Macedo Souto; Marcelo De Almeida Ferrer
Journal:  Acta Ortop Bras       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 0.513

4.  Is surgeons' experience important on intra- and inter-observer reliability of classifications used for adult femoral neck fracture?

Authors:  Ali Turgut; Mert Kumbaracı; Önder Kalenderer; Gökhan İlyas; Tayfun Bacaksız; Levent Karapınar
Journal:  Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc       Date:  2016-11-23       Impact factor: 1.511

5.  Femoral neck fracture: the reliability of radiologic classifications.

Authors:  Gianpiero Cazzato; Maria Serena Oliva; Giulia Masci; Raffaele Vitiello; Alessandro Smimmo; Maria Rosaria Matrangolo; Osvaldo Palmacci; Stefano D'Adamio; Antonio Ziranu
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2022-01-25       Impact factor: 2.362

Review 6.  Management of proximal femur fractures in the elderly: current concepts and treatment options.

Authors:  H Fischer; T Maleitzke; C Eder; S Ahmad; U Stöckle; K F Braun
Journal:  Eur J Med Res       Date:  2021-08-04       Impact factor: 2.175

7.  Three-Dimensional Reconstruction Modeling of the Spatial Displacement, Extent and Rotational Orientation of Undisplaced Femoral Neck Fractures.

Authors:  Xin Fu; Gui-Jun Xu; Zhi-Jun Li; Chang-Ling Du; Zhe Han; Tao Zhang; Xinlong Ma
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 1.817

Review 8.  An update on the Pauwels classification.

Authors:  Min Shen; Chen Wang; Hui Chen; Yun-Feng Rui; Song Zhao
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2016-12-12       Impact factor: 2.359

Review 9.  Biomechanics of Osteoporotic Fracture Fixation.

Authors:  Marianne Hollensteiner; Sabrina Sandriesser; Emily Bliven; Christian von Rüden; Peter Augat
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 5.096

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.