Paul K Maciejewski1, Holly G Prigerson. 1. Department of Psychiatry, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Abstract
CONTEXT: Overall, end-of-life (EOL) discussions are unrelated to psychological distress and associated with lower rates of aggressive care near death. Nevertheless, patients who report that they feel emotionally numb about their illness might encounter difficulties cognitively processing an EOL discussion. OBJECTIVES: We hypothesized that emotional numbness would modify the effect of EOL discussions on the receipt of less aggressive EOL care. METHODS: Data were derived from structured interviews with 290 participants in the federally-funded Coping with Cancer Study, a multisite, prospective cohort study of patients with advanced cancer followed-up till their death. Patients' reports of EOL discussions with their physician and emotional numbness were assessed at a median of 4.6 months before their death. Information about aggressive EOL care (i.e., ventilation, resuscitation in the last week of life, death in the intensive care unit) was obtained from postmortem caregiver interviews and medical charts. Main and interactive effects of EOL discussions and emotional numbness on aggressive EOL care, adjusting for potential confounds, were evaluated using multiple logistic regression. RESULTS: The likelihood of aggressive EOL care associated with having EOL discussions increased by a factor of nine (adjusted odds ratio=9.02, 95% CI 1.37, 59.6, P=0.022) for every unit increase in a patient's emotional numbness score. CONCLUSION: Emotional numbness diminishes a patient's capacity to benefit from EOL discussions. The EOL decision making may be more effective if clinical communications with emotionally numb patients are avoided.
CONTEXT: Overall, end-of-life (EOL) discussions are unrelated to psychological distress and associated with lower rates of aggressive care near death. Nevertheless, patients who report that they feel emotionally numb about their illness might encounter difficulties cognitively processing an EOL discussion. OBJECTIVES: We hypothesized that emotional numbness would modify the effect of EOL discussions on the receipt of less aggressive EOL care. METHODS: Data were derived from structured interviews with 290 participants in the federally-funded Coping with Cancer Study, a multisite, prospective cohort study of patients with advanced cancer followed-up till their death. Patients' reports of EOL discussions with their physician and emotional numbness were assessed at a median of 4.6 months before their death. Information about aggressive EOL care (i.e., ventilation, resuscitation in the last week of life, death in the intensive care unit) was obtained from postmortem caregiver interviews and medical charts. Main and interactive effects of EOL discussions and emotional numbness on aggressive EOL care, adjusting for potential confounds, were evaluated using multiple logistic regression. RESULTS: The likelihood of aggressive EOL care associated with having EOL discussions increased by a factor of nine (adjusted odds ratio=9.02, 95% CI 1.37, 59.6, P=0.022) for every unit increase in a patient's emotional numbness score. CONCLUSION:Emotional numbness diminishes a patient's capacity to benefit from EOL discussions. The EOL decision making may be more effective if clinical communications with emotionally numbpatients are avoided.
Authors: Baohui Zhang; Alexi A Wright; Haiden A Huskamp; Matthew E Nilsson; Matthew L Maciejewski; Craig C Earle; Susan D Block; Paul K Maciejewski; Holly G Prigerson Journal: Arch Intern Med Date: 2009-03-09
Authors: Alexi A Wright; Baohui Zhang; Alaka Ray; Jennifer W Mack; Elizabeth Trice; Tracy Balboni; Susan L Mitchell; Vicki A Jackson; Susan D Block; Paul K Maciejewski; Holly G Prigerson Journal: JAMA Date: 2008-10-08 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Kalen Fletcher; Holly G Prigerson; Elizabeth Paulk; Jennifer Temel; Esme Finlay; Lisa Marr; Ruth McCorkle; Lorna Rivera; Francisco Munoz; Paul K Maciejewski Journal: J Support Oncol Date: 2013-09
Authors: Sangeeta C Ahluwalia; Diana M Tisnado; Anne M Walling; Sydney M Dy; Steven M Asch; Susan L Ettner; Benjamin Kim; Philip Pantoja; Hannah C Schreibeis-Baum; Karl A Lorenz Journal: J Palliat Med Date: 2015-07-17 Impact factor: 2.947
Authors: Maxwell T Vergo; Jeremy Whyman; Zhigang Li; Jeanne Kestel; Spencer L James; Christopher Rector; John M Salsman Journal: J Palliat Med Date: 2016-09-01 Impact factor: 2.947
Authors: Renee D Stapleton; Dee W Ford; Katherine R Sterba; Nandita R Nadig; Steven Ades; Anthony L Back; Shannon S Carson; Katharine L Cheung; Janet Ely; Erin K Kross; Robert C Macauley; Jennifer M Maguire; Theodore W Marcy; Jennifer J McEntee; Prema R Menon; Amanda Overstreet; Christine S Ritchie; Blair Wendlandt; Sara S Ardren; Michael Balassone; Stephanie Burns; Summer Choudhury; Sandra Diehl; Ellen McCown; Elizabeth L Nielsen; Sudiptho R Paul; Colleen Rice; Katherine K Taylor; Ruth A Engelberg Journal: J Pain Symptom Manage Date: 2022-06 Impact factor: 5.576
Authors: Paul R Duberstein; Michael Chen; Michael Hoerger; Ronald M Epstein; Laura M Perry; Sule Yilmaz; Fahad Saeed; Supriya G Mohile; Sally A Norton Journal: J Pain Symptom Manage Date: 2019-10-19 Impact factor: 3.612