Literature DB >> 22925568

Effect of cerebral protection strategy on outcome of patients with Stanford type A aortic dissection.

Dominik Wiedemann1, Alfred Kocher, Marion Dorfmeister, Amit Vadehra, Stephane Mahr, Günther Laufer, Marek Ehrlich.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the present study was to assess the efficacy and mid- to long-term results of different cerebral protection techniques in the treatment of acute type A aortic dissection.
METHODS: Between April 1987 and January 2011, 329 patients (220 male patients; median age, 60 years; range, 16-87) with type A aortic dissection underwent replacement of the ascending aorta or aortic arch with an open distal anastomosis. Either hypothermic circulatory arrest alone at 18 °C (n = 116; 35%) or combined with retrograde cerebral perfusion (n = 122; 37%) or antegrade cerebral perfusion at 25 °C (n = 91; 28%) was used.
RESULTS: The median circulatory arrest time was 30 minutes (range, 12-92). The overall 30-day mortality was 19% (62 of 329). The 30-day mortality stratified by group was 26% (30 patients) in the hypothermic circulatory arrest group, 16% in the retrograde cerebral perfusion group (20 patients), and 13% (12 patients) in the antegrade cerebral perfusion group (P = .047). Permanent neurologic dysfunction occurred in 53 patients (16%), with statistically significant differences among the 3 groups (23% for hypothermic circulatory arrest, 12% for retrograde cerebral perfusion, and 12% for antegrade cerebral perfusion; P = .033). Univariate analysis showed a significant effect of the brain protection strategy on 30-day mortality and neurologic outcome. Multivariate analysis revealed preoperative hemodynamic instability, preoperative resuscitation, age, and operative year as independent predictors of 30-day mortality. Regarding permanent neurologic dysfunction, the multivariate analysis could not identify any independent predictors. Kaplan-Meier analyses revealed statistically significant differences among the 3 groups with a 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival rate of 84%, 79%, and 77% with antegrade cerebral perfusion, 75%, 72%, and 66% with retrograde cerebral perfusion, and 66%, 62%, and 60% with hypothermic circulatory arrest alone.
CONCLUSIONS: Patients in the antegrade cerebral perfusion group had the best short- and long-term survival rates. However, during the study period, several significant improvements in the treatment of patients with type A aortic dissection were achieved; therefore, independent predictors of mortality and permanent neurologic dysfunction were difficult to identify.
Copyright © 2013 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  26; 26.1; 26.1.2; 26.1.3; ACP; CPB; HCA; PND; RCP; antegrade cerebral perfusion; bACP; bilateral ACP; cardiopulmonary bypass; hypothermic circulatory arrest; permanent neurologic deficit; retrograde cerebral perfusion; uACP; unilateral ACP

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22925568     DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2012.07.072

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg        ISSN: 0022-5223            Impact factor:   5.209


  15 in total

Review 1.  Neuroprotective Strategies in Repair and Replacement of the Aortic Arch.

Authors:  Frank Manetta; Clancy W Mullan; Michael A Catalano
Journal:  Int J Angiol       Date:  2018-05-27

Review 2.  Cerebral perfusion issues in type A aortic dissection.

Authors:  Davide Pacini; Giacomo Murana; Luca Di Marco; Marianna Berardi; Carlo Mariani; Giuditta Coppola; Mariafrancesca Fiorentino; Alessandro Leone; Roberto Di Bartolomeo
Journal:  J Vis Surg       Date:  2018-04-24

3.  Comparison between antegrade and retrograde cerebral perfusion or profound hypothermia as brain protection strategies during repair of type A aortic dissection.

Authors:  Sotiris C Stamou; Laura A Rausch; Nicholas T Kouchoukos; Kevin W Lobdell; Kamal Khabbaz; Edward Murphy; Robert C Hagberg
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2016-07

4.  Con-debate: short circulatory arrest times in arch reconstructive surgery: is simple retrograde cerebral perfusion or hypothermic circulatory arrest as good or better than complex antegrade cerebral perfusion for open distal involvement or hemi-arch?

Authors:  Luca Di Marco; Giacomo Murana; Alessandro Leone; Davide Pacini
Journal:  J Vis Surg       Date:  2018-03-08

5.  Role of Moderate Hypothermia and Antegrade Cerebral Perfusion during Repair of Type A Aortic Dissection.

Authors:  Sotiris C Stamou; Michael A McHugh; Brian D Conway; Marcos Nores
Journal:  Int J Angiol       Date:  2018-10-29

6.  Antegrade versus retrograde cerebral perfusion for hemiarch replacement with deep hypothermic circulatory arrest: does it matter? A propensity-matched analysis.

Authors:  Asvin M Ganapathi; Jennifer M Hanna; Matthew A Schechter; Brian R Englum; Anthony W Castleberry; Jeffrey G Gaca; G Chad Hughes
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2014-04-13       Impact factor: 5.209

7.  Simple retrograde cerebral perfusion is as good as complex antegrade cerebral perfusion for hemiarch replacement.

Authors:  Akiko Tanaka; Anthony L Estrera
Journal:  J Vis Surg       Date:  2018-03-13

8.  Open and closed distal anastomosis for acute type A aortic dissection repair.

Authors:  Pietro G Malvindi; Amit Modi; Szabolcs Miskolczi; Markku Kaarne; Theodore Velissaris; Clifford Barlow; Sunil K Ohri; Geoffrey Tsang; Steven Livesey
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2016-03-07

9.  A meta-analysis of deep hypothermic circulatory arrest versus moderate hypothermic circulatory arrest with selective antegrade cerebral perfusion.

Authors:  David H Tian; Benjamin Wan; Paul G Bannon; Martin Misfeld; Scott A LeMaire; Teruhisa Kazui; Nicholas T Kouchoukos; John A Elefteriades; Joseph Bavaria; Joseph S Coselli; Randall B Griepp; Friedrich W Mohr; Aung Oo; Lars G Svensson; G Chad Hughes; Tristan D Yan
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2013-03

10.  Effect of Retrograde Cerebral Protection Strategy on Outcome of Patients with Stanford Type A Aortic Dissection.

Authors:  Ming-Yuan Kang; Shih-Rong Hsieh; Hung-Wen Tsai; Hao-Ji Wei; Chung-Chi Wang; Chu-Leng Yu; Chung-Lin Tsai
Journal:  Acta Cardiol Sin       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 2.672

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.