Literature DB >> 22924959

Real-time fit of a respirator during simulated health care tasks.

Jessica Hauge1, Marc Roe, Lisa M Brosseau, Craig Colton.   

Abstract

Fit is an important but difficult-to-predict feature of respirator performance. This study examined a new approach to measuring respirator performance using two continuous direct-reading particle-counting instruments in a simulated health care workplace. A pilot test was conducted with eight experienced health care professionals who passed a traditional quantitative fit test before performing three randomized 10-min health care scenarios (patient assessment [PA], IV treatment [IV], and wound care [WC]). Two TSI Portacount Plus (Model 8020) with N95 Companion (Model 8095) instruments were used to continuously measure 1-sec ambient particle concentrations inside and outside the respirator facepiece. A simulated workplace protection factor (SWPF) was calculated by dividing outside by inside concentrations. Data were log transformed and examined using analysis of variance (ANOVA) between subjects, scenario types, and scenario order. The GM SWPF for the eight subjects, three scenarios per subject, ranged from 172 to 1073 (GSD 1.7 to 3.5) and was significantly different for each subject. A multi-way analysis of variance showed no difference between the three scenario types (PA, IV, WC). There were differences by the order in which scenarios were performed: the third scenario SWPF was significantly different and higher than that of the first and second scenarios. All subjects passed the initial quantitative fit test with a fit factor of at least 100. Five subjects had fit factors greater than 200 and GM scenario SWPFs greater than 400. Three participants with initial fit factors less than 200 had GM scenario SWPFs ranging from 132 to 326. This pilot test demonstrates that it is possible to evaluate instantaneous respirator fit using two quantitative fit test instruments in a simulated health care environment. Results suggest that an initial fit test may be predictive of fit during simulated tasks and that one scenario may be adequate for measuring a simulated workplace protection factor. [Supplementary materials are available for this article. Go to the publisher's online edition of Journal of Occupational and Environmental Hygiene for the following free supplemental resource: a video for subject D activities overlaid with simulated workplace protection factor data.].

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22924959     DOI: 10.1080/15459624.2012.711699

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Occup Environ Hyg        ISSN: 1545-9624            Impact factor:   2.155


  9 in total

1.  Performance of two respiratory protective devices used by home-attending health care workers (a pilot study).

Authors:  Reported By Yousef Elmashae; Sergey A Grinshpun; Tiina Reponen; Michael Yermakov; Robert Riddle
Journal:  J Occup Environ Hyg       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 2.155

2.  Protection factor for N95 filtering facepiece respirators exposed to laboratory aerosols containing different concentrations of nanoparticles.

Authors:  Samy Rengasamy; Gary Walbert; William Newcomb; Christopher Coffey; James Terrence Wassell; Jonathan Szalajda
Journal:  Ann Occup Hyg       Date:  2014-11-25

3.  Effect of Pregnancy Upon Facial Anthropometrics and Respirator Fit Testing.

Authors:  Raymond J Roberge; Jung-Hyun Kim; Andrew Palmiero; Jeffrey B Powell
Journal:  J Occup Environ Hyg       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.155

4.  Are quantitative fit factors predictive of respirator fit during simulated healthcare activities?

Authors:  Margaret Sietsema; Lisa M Brosseau
Journal:  J Occup Environ Hyg       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 2.155

5.  Effect of upper strap downward displacement on n95 filtering facepiece respirator fit factors: a pilot study.

Authors:  Raymond J Roberge; Andrew J Palmiero; Yuewei Liu; Jung-Hyun Kim; Ziqing Zhuang
Journal:  J Occup Environ Hyg       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 2.155

6.  A technique to measure respirator protection factors against aerosol particles in simulated workplace settings using portable instruments.

Authors:  Evanly Vo; Matthew Horvatin; Michael Bergman; Bingbing Wu; Ziqing Zhuang
Journal:  J Occup Environ Hyg       Date:  2020-04-03       Impact factor: 3.359

7.  Assessing real-time performances of N95 respirators for health care workers by simulated workplace protection factors.

Authors:  Hyunwook Kim; Jung-Eun Baek; Hye-Kyung Seo; Jong-Eun Lee; Jun-Pyo Myong; Seung-Joo Lee; Jin-Ho Lee
Journal:  Ind Health       Date:  2015-08-28       Impact factor: 2.179

8.  Considerations for recommending extended use and limited reuse of filtering facepiece respirators in health care settings.

Authors:  Edward M Fisher; Ronald E Shaffer
Journal:  J Occup Environ Hyg       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 2.155

9.  Viscoelastic Polyurethane Foams for Use in Seals of Respiratory Protective Devices.

Authors:  Małgorzata Okrasa; Milena Leszczyńska; Kamila Sałasińska; Leonard Szczepkowski; Paweł Kozikowski; Katarzyna Majchrzycka; Joanna Ryszkowska
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2021-03-25       Impact factor: 3.623

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.