Literature DB >> 22924691

Expectations of benefit and tolerance to risk of individuals with spinal cord injury regarding potential participation in clinical trials.

Brian K Kwon1, Arvindera Ghag, Marcel F Dvorak, Wolfram Tetzlaff, Judy Illes.   

Abstract

We conducted a survey of individuals living with spinal cord injury (SCI) to determine their receptivity to participating in clinical trials of drug therapies or stem cell therapies, their anticipation of therapeutic benefits, and their tolerance to risk. A 46-item questionnaire was administered to individuals with cervical or thoracic SCI identified through a provincial database. The average age was 42 years and the individuals were, on average, 5.5 years post-injury. Receptivity to neuroprotective drug trials in the acute setting was very high, but somewhat less so for stem cell trials in the subacute or chronic (current) setting. With respect to expectation of functional benefit, approximately one third of the respondents indicated that they would want a 5-25% chance of achieving some functional recovery if enrolling in a stem cell therapy clinical trial in the current, chronic injury state. Whereas the majority typically would require the risk of spinal cord damage, cancer, infection, and nerve pain from invasive cell transplantation trials to be ≤1%, 15-30% would participate regardless of the risk of these complications. The factors associated with this high risk tolerance were gender (males>females), age (elderly>young), and self-reported knowledge of SCI research (greater knowledge>less knowledge). Injury severity or chronicity did not have a significant correlation with risk tolerance. Whereas previous studies have shown that the understanding of stem cell science is limited among individuals with SCI, here we show that many still have high hopes for the possibility of neurological benefit, are anxious to participate in invasive stem cell trials, and, in many cases, have high tolerance for risk in such trials. Taken together, the data underscore the need for careful communication with individuals with SCI to avoid unrealistic expectations and therapeutic misconception in experimental trials.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22924691     DOI: 10.1089/neu.2012.2550

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurotrauma        ISSN: 0897-7151            Impact factor:   5.269


  8 in total

Review 1.  The challenge of recruitment for neurotherapeutic clinical trials in spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Andrew R Blight; Jane Hsieh; Armin Curt; James W Fawcett; James D Guest; Naomi Kleitman; Shekar N Kurpad; Brian K Kwon; Daniel P Lammertse; Norbert Weidner; John D Steeves
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2019-04-08       Impact factor: 2.772

Review 2.  Ethical development of stem-cell-based interventions.

Authors:  Amanda MacPherson; Jonathan Kimmelman
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2019-07-03       Impact factor: 53.440

3.  How individuals with spinal cord injury in the United States access and assess information about experimental therapies and clinical trials: results of a clinical survey.

Authors:  Clara Farrehi; Carlotta Pazzi; Maclain Capron; Kim Anderson; Bonnie Richardson; Michael Stillman
Journal:  Spinal Cord Ser Cases       Date:  2020-11-23

4.  An Assessment of Which Sociodemographic and Spinal Cord Injury-Specific Characteristics Influence Engagement With Experimental Therapies and Participation in Clinical Trials.

Authors:  Carlotta Pazzi; Clara Farrehi; Maclain Capron; Kim Anderson; Bonnie Richardson; Michael Stillman
Journal:  Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil       Date:  2021-11-17

5.  "Is a cure in my sight?" Multi-stakeholder perspectives on phase I choroideremia gene transfer clinical trials.

Authors:  Shelly Benjaminy; Ian Macdonald; Tania Bubela
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2013-09-26       Impact factor: 8.822

6.  Longitudinal study of informed consent in innovative therapy research: experience and provisional recommendations from a multicenter trial of intracerebral grafting.

Authors:  Laurent Cleret de Langavant; Sophie Sudraud; Christophe Verny; Pierre Krystkowiak; Clémence Simonin; Philippe Damier; Jean-François Demonet; Frédéric Supiot; Amandine Rialland; David Schmitz; Patrick Maison; Katia Youssov; Anne-Catherine Bachoud-Lévi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-05-26       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Recovery priorities in degenerative cervical myelopathy: a cross-sectional survey of an international, online community of patients.

Authors:  Benjamin Davies; Oliver Mowforth; Iwan Sadler; Bizhan Aarabi; Brian Kwon; Shekar Kurpad; James S Harrop; Jefferson R Wilson; Robert Grossman; Michael G Fehlings; Mark Kotter
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-10-10       Impact factor: 2.692

8.  Mechanisms underlying the promotion of functional recovery by deferoxamine after spinal cord injury in rats.

Authors:  Jian Hao; Bo Li; Hui-Quan Duan; Chen-Xi Zhao; Yan Zhang; Chao Sun; Bin Pan; Chang Liu; Xiao-Hong Kong; Xue Yao; Shi-Qing Feng
Journal:  Neural Regen Res       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 5.135

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.