PURPOSE: To evaluate if arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) that are associated with a high rupture risk (HRR) are represented by different intranidal Time-of-Flight (TOF) magnetic resonance angiography intensity distributions compared to those with presumably low rupture risk (LRR). METHODS: Fifty post-contrast TOF datasets of patients with an AVM were analyzed in this study. The patients were classified to the HRR group in case of a deep location, presence of exclusive deep venous drainage, previous hemorrhagic event or a combination thereof. For each TOF dataset, the AVM nidus was semi-automatically delineated and used for histogram extraction. Each histogram was analyzed by calculating the skewness, kurtosis, mean and median intensity and full-width-half-maximum. Statistical analysis was performed using parameter-wise two-sided t-tests of the parameters between the two groups. RESULTS: Based on morphological analysis, 21 patients were classified to the HRR and 29 patients to the LRR group. Statistical analysis revealed that TOF intensity distributions of HRR AVMs exhibit a significant higher skewness (p=0.0005) parameter compared to LRR AVMs. Contrary to these findings, no significant differences were found for the other parameters evaluated. CONCLUSION: Intranidal flow heterogeneity, for example, caused by turbulent flow conditions, may play an important role for risk of a hemorrhage. An analysis of post-contrast TOF intensities within the nidus of an AVM may offer simple and valuable information for clinical risk estimation of AVMs and needs to be tested prospectively.
PURPOSE: To evaluate if arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) that are associated with a high rupture risk (HRR) are represented by different intranidal Time-of-Flight (TOF) magnetic resonance angiography intensity distributions compared to those with presumably low rupture risk (LRR). METHODS: Fifty post-contrast TOF datasets of patients with an AVM were analyzed in this study. The patients were classified to the HRR group in case of a deep location, presence of exclusive deep venous drainage, previous hemorrhagic event or a combination thereof. For each TOF dataset, the AVM nidus was semi-automatically delineated and used for histogram extraction. Each histogram was analyzed by calculating the skewness, kurtosis, mean and median intensity and full-width-half-maximum. Statistical analysis was performed using parameter-wise two-sided t-tests of the parameters between the two groups. RESULTS: Based on morphological analysis, 21 patients were classified to the HRR and 29 patients to the LRR group. Statistical analysis revealed that TOF intensity distributions of HRR AVMs exhibit a significant higher skewness (p=0.0005) parameter compared to LRR AVMs. Contrary to these findings, no significant differences were found for the other parameters evaluated. CONCLUSION: Intranidal flow heterogeneity, for example, caused by turbulent flow conditions, may play an important role for risk of a hemorrhage. An analysis of post-contrast TOF intensities within the nidus of an AVM may offer simple and valuable information for clinical risk estimation of AVMs and needs to be tested prospectively.
Authors: N D Forkert; A Schmidt-Richberg; J Fiehler; T Illies; D Möller; H Handels; D Säring Journal: Methods Inf Med Date: 2010-11-08 Impact factor: 2.176
Authors: Nils Daniel Forkert; Jens Fiehler; Thorsten Ries; Till Illies; Dietmar Möller; Heinz Handels; Dennis Säring Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2011-01 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: C Stapf; H Mast; R R Sciacca; J H Choi; A V Khaw; E S Connolly; J Pile-Spellman; J P Mohr Journal: Neurology Date: 2006-05-09 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: H Mast; W L Young; H C Koennecke; R R Sciacca; A Osipov; J Pile-Spellman; L Hacein-Bey; H Duong; B M Stein; J P Mohr Journal: Lancet Date: 1997-10-11 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: C Stapf; H Mast; R R Sciacca; A Berenstein; P K Nelson; Y P Gobin; J Pile-Spellman; J P Mohr Journal: Stroke Date: 2003-04-10 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Michael Markl; Frandics P Chan; Marcus T Alley; Kris L Wedding; Mary T Draney; Chris J Elkins; David W Parker; Ryan Wicker; Charles A Taylor; Robert J Herfkens; Norbert J Pelc Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2003-04 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: J Fiehler; T Illies; M Piening; D Säring; N Forkert; J Regelsberger; U Grzyska; H Handels; J V Byrne Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2008-11-11 Impact factor: 3.825