Literature DB >> 2292277

Postural maintenance during fast forward bending: a model simulation experiment determines the "reduced trajectory".

C F Ramos1, L W Stark.   

Abstract

A recent article by Crenna et al. (1987) has shown that fast, forward bending movements are accompanied by a backwards motion of the hips and lower limbs. The ongoing research presented in this brief note expands upon the experimental data described by Crenna and colleagues, concerning the postural activities associated with rapid forward bending in standing man. Our primary experimental tool is the computer simulation method, with the standing subject being represented by a double-joint system: the trunk is modeled as a rigid link mechanically coupled (via a "hip" joint) to the lower body link fixed to the ground (via an "ankle" joint). Each of the two joints in this system is independently controlled by a neurological control model for single joint movements, consisting of an idealized pair of antagonistic muscles (flexor and extensor), their common load, and proprioception from the muscle spindles. This model thereby integrates descending commands with proprioceptive feedback in controlling the joint movements. Our early simulation experiments determine a "reduced trajectory", that is, the physical perturbation to the postural system, due to the voluntary movement, in the absence of any stabilizing activities. These simulation experiments clearly show that an important component of the backward movements in the hips and lower limbs during forward bending is indeed due to the mechanical (physical) coupling between the upper and lower body segments and thus not solely a consequence of the anticipatory postural muscle activity. Simulations also predict that any postural activities in the hips and lower limbs should be a two-fold process: first, some preprogrammed, descending control to the lower body would be required to actively enhance the passive, backwards motion (this is consistent with, though not strictly identical to, the hypothesis of Crenna and colleagues); secondly, there must be a subsequent activation in the anterior muscles of the lower body in order to arrest this backwards motion, since otherwise the uncountered momentum would carry the body backward to the floor in less than half a second after the upper body movement has terminated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2292277     DOI: 10.1007/bf00228807

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  8 in total

1.  Modeling the neurological control of human movements.

Authors:  C F Ramos; L W Stark
Journal:  J Mot Behav       Date:  1988-12       Impact factor: 1.328

2.  Postural maintenance during movement: simulations of a two joint model.

Authors:  C F Ramos; L W Stark
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 2.086

3.  Are dynamic phenomena prior to stepping essential to walking?

Authors:  Y Brenière; M Cuong Do; S Bouisset
Journal:  J Mot Behav       Date:  1987-03       Impact factor: 1.328

4.  Simulation studies of descending and reflex control of fast movements.

Authors:  C F Ramos; L W Stark
Journal:  J Mot Behav       Date:  1987-03       Impact factor: 1.328

5.  Roles of the elements of the triphasic control signal.

Authors:  B Hannaford; L Stark
Journal:  Exp Neurol       Date:  1985-12       Impact factor: 5.330

6.  Forward and backward axial synergies in man.

Authors:  P Crenna; C Frigo; J Massion; A Pedotti
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Behaviour space of a stretch reflex model and its implications for the neural control of voluntary movement.

Authors:  C F Ramos; S S Hacisalihzade; L W Stark
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  1990-01       Impact factor: 2.602

8.  Posturo-kinetic organisation during the early phase of voluntary upper limb movement. 1. Normal subjects.

Authors:  M Zattara; S Bouisset
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1988-07       Impact factor: 10.154

  8 in total
  9 in total

1.  Variant and invariant features characterizing natural and reverse whole-body pointing movements.

Authors:  Enrico Chiovetto; Laura Patanè; Thierry Pozzo
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-02-25       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  An Engineering Model of Human Balance Control-Part I: Biomechanical Model.

Authors:  Joseph E Barton; Anindo Roy; John D Sorkin; Mark W Rogers; Richard Macko
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 2.097

3.  Kinematic synergy adaptation to an unstable support surface and equilibrium maintenance during forward trunk movement.

Authors:  S Vernazza-Martin; N Martin; A Le Pellec-Muller; V Tricon; J Massion
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-03-22       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Effect of aging on the coordination between equilibrium and movement: what changes?

Authors:  S Vernazza-Martin; V Tricon; N Martin; S Mesure; J P Azulay; A Le Pellec-Muller
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-03-18       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  A mathematical tool to generate complex whole body motor tasks and test hypotheses on underlying motor planning.

Authors:  Michele Tagliabue; Alessandra Pedrocchi; Thierry Pozzo; Giancarlo Ferrigno
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2007-09-11       Impact factor: 2.602

6.  Early and late components of feed-forward postural adjustments to predictable perturbations.

Authors:  Vennila Krishnan; Mark L Latash; Alexander S Aruin
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-10-07       Impact factor: 3.708

7.  Two stages and three components of the postural preparation to action.

Authors:  Vennila Krishnan; Alexander S Aruin; Mark L Latash
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-05-03       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Anticipatory postural adjustments and anticipatory synergy adjustments: preparing to a postural perturbation with predictable and unpredictable direction.

Authors:  Daniele Piscitelli; Ali Falaki; Stanislaw Solnik; Mark L Latash
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-11-19       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Trunk muscles contribute as functional groups to directionality of reaching during stance.

Authors:  Alexander Stamenkovic; Paul J Stapley
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-01-09       Impact factor: 1.972

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.