| Literature DB >> 22922064 |
Vitold E Galkin1, Albina Orlova, Edward H Egelman.
Abstract
A recent perspective [Erickson, H. (2012). Bacterial actin homolog ParM: arguments for an apolar, antiparallel double helix. J. Mol. Biol., 422, 461-463] by Harold Erickson has suggested that published reconstructions of bacterial ParM filaments from three different laboratories may have artifactually imposed polarity upon a filament that is really bipolar, with the two strands running in opposite directions. We show that Erickson's model of a bipolar filament can be easily distinguished from a polar filament by helical diffraction, since the asymmetric unit in a bipolar filament would be twice the size as that in a polar filament. Existing data from both electron cryo-microscopy and X-ray diffraction exclude a bipolar model. We adopt the suggestion put forward by Erickson to process filaments, assuming that they are bipolar, and show that the resulting filaments are polar.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2012 PMID: 22922064 PMCID: PMC3467344 DOI: 10.1016/j.jmb.2012.08.006
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Mol Biol ISSN: 0022-2836 Impact factor: 5.469