Literature DB >> 22921686

Computer-assisted provision of hormonal contraception in acute care settings.

Eleanor B Schwarz1, Elizabeth J Burch, Sara M Parisi, Kathleen P Tebb, Daniel Grossman, Ateev Mehrotra, Ralph Gonzales.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: We evaluated whether computerized counseling about contraceptive options and screening for contraindications increased women's subsequent knowledge and use of hormonal contraception.
METHODS: For the study 814 women aged 18-45 years were recruited from the waiting rooms of three emergency departments and an urgent care clinic staffed by non-gynecologists and asked to use a randomly selected computer module before seeing a clinician.
RESULTS: Women in the intervention group were more likely to report receiving a contraceptive prescription when seeking acute care than women in the control group (16% vs. 1%, p=.001). Women who requested contraceptive refills were not less likely than women requesting new prescriptions to have potential contraindications to estrogen (75% of refills vs. 52% new, p=.23). Three months after visiting the clinic, women in the intervention group tended to be more likely to have used contraception at last intercourse (71% vs. 65%, p=.91) and to correctly answer questions about contraceptive effectiveness, but these differences were not statistically significant.
CONCLUSION: Patient-facing computers appear to increase access to prescription contraception for women seeking acute care.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22921686      PMCID: PMC4063121          DOI: 10.1016/j.contraception.2012.07.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Contraception        ISSN: 0010-7824            Impact factor:   3.375


  22 in total

1.  Disparities in rates of unintended pregnancy in the United States, 1994 and 2001.

Authors:  Lawrence B Finer; Stanley K Henshaw
Journal:  Perspect Sex Reprod Health       Date:  2006-06

2.  Barriers to contraceptive use in product labeling and practice guidelines.

Authors:  Daniel Grossman; Charlotte Ellertson; Katrina Abuabara; Kelly Blanchard; Francisco T Rivas
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2006-01-31       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  Over-the-internet availability of hormonal contraceptives regardless of risk factors.

Authors:  Lisa M Memmel; Leslie Miller; Jacqueline Gardner
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2005-12-15       Impact factor: 3.375

4.  Intention to use a combined contraceptive method and decision after counselling in Switzerland--Swiss data from the European CHOICE study.

Authors:  Gabriele S Merki-Feld; Isabel M L Gruber
Journal:  Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care       Date:  2011-12-27       Impact factor: 1.848

5.  Providers' perspectives on challenges to contraceptive counseling in primary care settings.

Authors:  Aletha Y Akers; Melanie A Gold; Sonya Borrero; Aimee Santucci; Eleanor B Schwarz
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 2.681

6.  Need for emergency contraception in urgent care settings.

Authors:  Eleanor Bimla Schwarz; Barbara Gerbert; Ralph Gonzales
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2007-01-16       Impact factor: 3.375

7.  Patterns in the socioeconomic characteristics of women obtaining abortions in 2000-2001.

Authors:  Rachel K Jones; Jacqueline E Darroch; Stanley K Henshaw
Journal:  Perspect Sex Reprod Health       Date:  2002 Sep-Oct

8.  Computer-assisted provision of emergency contraception a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Eleanor Bimla Schwarz; Barbara Gerbert; Ralph Gonzales
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2008-04-09       Impact factor: 5.128

9.  Accuracy of self-screening for contraindications to combined oral contraceptive use.

Authors:  Daniel Grossman; Leticia Fernandez; Kristine Hopkins; Jon Amastae; Sandra G Garcia; Joseph E Potter
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 7.661

10.  Computerized counseling for folate knowledge and use: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Eleanor Bimla Schwarz; Mindy Sobota; Ralph Gonzales; Barbara Gerbert
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 5.043

View more
  8 in total

1.  An interactive website to aid young women's choice of contraception: feasibility and efficacy RCT.

Authors:  Judith Stephenson; Julia V Bailey; Ann Blandford; Nataliya Brima; Andrew Copas; Preethy D'Souza; Anasztazia Gubijev; Rachael Hunter; Jill Shawe; Greta Rait; Sandy Oliver
Journal:  Health Technol Assess       Date:  2020-11       Impact factor: 4.014

2.  Contraceptive Initiation Among Women in the United States: Timing, Methods Used, and Pregnancy Outcomes.

Authors:  Mara E Murray Horwitz; Dennis Ross-Degnan; Lydia E Pace
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2019-01-15       Impact factor: 7.124

3.  Client Preferences for Contraceptive Counseling: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Edith Fox; Arlene Reyna; Nikita M Malcolm; Rachel B Rosmarin; Lauren B Zapata; Brittni N Frederiksen; Susan B Moskosky; Christine Dehlendorf
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 5.043

4.  An interactive website for informed contraception choice: randomised evaluation of Contraception Choices.

Authors:  Judith Stephenson; Julia V Bailey; Ana Gubijev; Preethy D'Souza; Sandy Oliver; Ann Blandford; Rachael Hunter; Jill Shawe; Greta Rait; Nataliya Brima; Andrew Copas
Journal:  Digit Health       Date:  2020-06-26

Review 5.  Interventions to improve the person-centered quality of family planning services: a narrative review.

Authors:  Nadia Diamond-Smith; Ruby Warnock; May Sudhinaraset
Journal:  Reprod Health       Date:  2018-08-28       Impact factor: 3.223

6.  A Mobile Health Contraception Decision Support Intervention for Latina Adolescents: Implementation Evaluation for Use in School-Based Health Centers.

Authors:  Kathleen P Tebb; Sang Leng Trieu; Rosario Rico; Robert Renteria; Felicia Rodriguez; Maryjane Puffer
Journal:  JMIR Mhealth Uhealth       Date:  2019-03-14       Impact factor: 4.773

7.  Participant views and experiences of sexual health research: The Contraception Choices online trial.

Authors:  Julia V Bailey; Kirsty F Bennett; Anasztazia Gubijev; Jill Shawe; Judith Stephenson
Journal:  Digit Health       Date:  2021-08-12

8.  A systematic review of the effect of reproductive intention screening in primary care settings on reproductive health outcomes.

Authors:  Carolyne K Burgess; Paul A Henning; Wendy V Norman; Meredith G Manze; Heidi E Jones
Journal:  Fam Pract       Date:  2018-03-27       Impact factor: 2.267

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.