Literature DB >> 22921623

A meta-analysis of the effects of feeding yeast culture produced by anaerobic fermentation of Saccharomyces cerevisiae on milk production of lactating dairy cows.

G D Poppy1, A R Rabiee, I J Lean, W K Sanchez, K L Dorton, P S Morley.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to use meta-analytic methods to estimate the effect of a commercially available yeast culture product on milk production and other production measures in lactating dairy cows using a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Sixty-one research publications (published journal articles, published abstracts, and technical reports) were identified through a review of literature provided by the manufacturer and a search of published literature using 6 search engines. Thirty-six separate studies with 69 comparisons met the criteria for inclusion in the meta-analysis. The fixed-effect meta-analysis showed substantial heterogeneity for milk yield, energy-corrected milk, 3.5% fat-corrected milk, milk fat yield, and milk protein yield. Sub-group analysis of the data showed much less heterogeneity in peer-reviewed studies versus non-peer-reviewed abstracts and technical reports, and tended to show higher, but not significantly different, treatment effects. A random-effects meta-analysis showed estimated raw mean differences between treated and untreated cattle reported in peer-reviewed publications of 1.18 kg/d [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.55 to 1.81], 1.61 kg/d (95% CI: 0.92 to 2.29), and 1.65 kg/d (95% CI: 0.97 to 2.34) for milk yield, 3.5% fat-corrected milk, and energy-corrected milk, respectively. Milk fat yield and milk protein yield for peer-reviewed studies showed an increase in the raw mean difference of 0.06 kg/d (95% CI: 0.01 to 0.10) and 0.03 kg/d (95% CI: 0.00 to 0.05), respectively. Estimated raw mean dry matter intake of the peer-reviewed studies during early lactation (<70 d in milk) and not-early lactation were 0.62 kg/d (95% CI: 0.21 to 1.02) and a decrease of 0.78 kg/d (95% CI: -1.36 to -0.21), respectively. These findings provide strong evidence that this commercially available yeast culture product provides significant improvement in several important milk production outcomes as evaluated in production settings typical for commercial dairies in North America. Utilizing meta-analytic methods to study the complete breadth of information relating to a specific treatment by studying multiple overcomes of all eligible studies can reduce the uncertainty often seen in small individual studies designed without sufficient power to detect differences in treatments.
Copyright © 2012 American Dairy Science Association. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22921623     DOI: 10.3168/jds.2012-5577

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Dairy Sci        ISSN: 0022-0302            Impact factor:   4.034


  16 in total

1.  Influence of yeast culture and feed antibiotics on ruminal fermentation and site and extent of digestion in beef heifers fed high grain rations1.

Authors:  Yizhao Shen; Hongrong Wang; Tao Ran; Ilkyu Yoon; Atef Mohamed Saleem; Wenzhu Yang
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2018-09-07       Impact factor: 3.159

2.  Response of Milk Performance, Rumen and Hindgut Microbiome to Dietary Supplementation with Aspergillus oryzae Fermentation Extracts in Dairy Cows.

Authors:  Jiyou Zhang; Wei Jin; Yun Jiang; Fei Xie; Shengyong Mao
Journal:  Curr Microbiol       Date:  2022-02-20       Impact factor: 2.188

Review 3.  Role of probiotics in ruminant nutrition as natural modulators of health and productivity of animals in tropical countries: an overview.

Authors:  Nitish A Kulkarni; H S Chethan; Rashika Srivastava; Anil B Gabbur
Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod       Date:  2022-02-23       Impact factor: 1.559

4.  Effect of yeast products supplementation during transition period on metabolic profile and milk production in dairy cows.

Authors:  Claudia Faccio-Demarco; Tatiele Mumbach; Vanessa Oliveira-de-Freitas; Raquel Fraga E Silva-Raimondo; Fernanda Medeiros-Gonçalves; Marcio Nunes-Corrêa; Francisco Augusto Burkert-Del Pino; Henrique Mendonça-Nunes-Ribeiro Filho; Cássio Cassal-Brauner
Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod       Date:  2019-05-24       Impact factor: 1.893

5.  Conversion of yellow wine lees into high-protein yeast culture by solid-state fermentation.

Authors:  Yuanliang Hu; Lina Pan; Yaohao Dun; Nan Peng; Yunxiang Liang; Shumiao Zhao
Journal:  Biotechnol Biotechnol Equip       Date:  2014-10-22       Impact factor: 1.632

6.  Effect of Saccharomyces cerevisiae Fermentation Product on Lactation Performance and Lipopolysaccharide Concentration of Dairy Cows.

Authors:  Rui-Yang Zhang; Ilkyu Yoon; Wei-Yun Zhu; Sheng-Yong Mao
Journal:  Asian-Australas J Anim Sci       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 2.509

Review 7.  Review: Utilization of yeast of Saccharomyces cerevisiae origin in artificially raised calves.

Authors:  Gibson M Alugongo; Jianxin Xiao; Zhaohai Wu; Shengli Li; Yajing Wang; Zhijun Cao
Journal:  J Anim Sci Biotechnol       Date:  2017-05-01

8.  Effects of Saccharomyces cerevisiae fermentation products on performance and rumen fermentation and microbiota in dairy cows fed a diet containing low quality forage.

Authors:  Wen Zhu; Zihai Wei; Ningning Xu; Fan Yang; Ilkyu Yoon; Yihua Chung; Jianxin Liu; Jiakun Wang
Journal:  J Anim Sci Biotechnol       Date:  2017-04-28

9.  Effects of a Saccharomyces cerevisiae fermentation product on liver abscesses, fecal microbiome, and resistome in feedlot cattle raised without antibiotics.

Authors:  Katherine L Huebner; Jennifer N Martin; Carla J Weissend; Katlyn L Holzer; Jennifer K Parker; Steven M Lakin; Enrique Doster; Margaret D Weinroth; Zaid Abdo; Dale R Woerner; Jessica L Metcalf; Ifigenia Geornaras; Tony C Bryant; Paul S Morley; Keith E Belk
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-02-22       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Effects of Supplemental Levels of Saccharomyces cerevisiae Fermentation Product on Lactation Performance in Dairy Cows under Heat Stress.

Authors:  W Zhu; B X Zhang; K Y Yao; I Yoon; Y H Chung; J K Wang; J X Liu
Journal:  Asian-Australas J Anim Sci       Date:  2015-09-10       Impact factor: 2.509

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.