Literature DB >> 22921156

The feasibility of nipple aspiration and duct lavage to evaluate the breast duct epithelium of women with increased breast cancer risk.

Dominique Twelves1, Ashutosh Nerurkar, Peter Osin, Ann Ward, Clare M Isacke, Gerald P H Gui.   

Abstract

AIM: Nipple aspiration (NA) and duct lavage (DL) are modalities for obtaining breast duct fluid for biomarker analyses. The aim of this study was to assess the feasibility of obtaining serial NA and DL samples at consecutive patient visits for cytology assessment and the creation of a biobank.
METHODS: Seventy eligible subjects were enroled at a single institution in the United Kingdom as part of an international multicentre study. Entry criteria were based on a 5-year Gail model risk of ≥2% or Claus score lifetime risk of ≥26%. Women underwent NA and DL in an outpatient clinic under local anaesthesia.
RESULTS: The mean patient age was 48 (range 41-69)years. Sixty seven out of 70 women (96%) attended three consecutive 6 monthly visits and follow-up for 2 years. Three women withdrew due to intolerance of the DL procedure. 56/67 (83%) women produced NA fluid from at least one duct. 204/264 (77%) of ducts declared by NA were cannulated for DL. 170/204 (83%) produced DL samples with adequate cellularity. By the final visit 52/67 (78%) women produced DL, 28/52 (54%) of whom were premenopausal and 24/52 (46%) were postmenopausal. 50/52 women (96%) underwent repeated DL of 81 ducts on 3 consecutive visits.
CONCLUSION: NA and DL are well tolerated for repeated assessment to obtain material for cytology and to create a biobank for future biomarker studies in women at high breast cancer risk.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22921156     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2012.07.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cancer        ISSN: 0959-8049            Impact factor:   9.162


  6 in total

Review 1.  Nipple aspirate fluid and its use for the early detection of breast cancer.

Authors:  Natasha Jiwa; Ahmed Ezzat; Josephine Holt; Dhuleep S Wijayatilake; Zoltan Takats; Daniel Richard Leff
Journal:  Ann Med Surg (Lond)       Date:  2022-04-18

2.  Repeated nipple fluid aspiration: compliance and feasibility results from a prospective multicenter study.

Authors:  J S de Groot; C B Moelans; S G Elias; A Hennink; B Verolme; K P M Suijkerbuijk; A Jager; C Seynaeve; P Bos; A J Witkamp; M G E M Ausems; P J van Diest; E van der Wall
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-05-22       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Development and validation of a nomogram to predict drainage duration in patients with breast cancer treated with modified radical mastectomy.

Authors:  Song Wu; Zechang Xin; Daxing Sui; Zhengli Ou; Haotian Bai; Shenzhen Zhu; Xueying Wang; Jiaxin Zhang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-01-28       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 4.  Diagnostic Accuracy of Nipple Aspirate Fluid Cytology in Asymptomatic Patients: A Meta-analysis and Systematic Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Natasha Jiwa; Rishikesh Gandhewar; Hemali Chauhan; Hutan Ashrafian; Swathica Kumar; Corrina Wright; Zoltan Takats; Daniel Richard Leff
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2020-11-09       Impact factor: 5.344

Review 5.  Diagnostic Accuracy of Nipple Discharge Fluid Cytology: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Natasha Jiwa; Swathica Kumar; Rishikesh Gandhewar; Hemali Chauhan; Vikneswaran Nagarajan; Corrina Wright; Dimitri Hadjiminas; Zoltan Takats; Hutan Ashrafian; Daniel Richard Leff
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2021-11-27       Impact factor: 5.344

Review 6.  Resolving breast cancer heterogeneity by searching reliable protein cancer biomarkers in the breast fluid secretome.

Authors:  Ferdinando Mannello; Daniela Ligi
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2013-07-12       Impact factor: 4.430

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.