Literature DB >> 22920860

Intake fraction for the indoor environment: a tool for prioritizing indoor chemical sources.

Hyeong-Moo Shin1, Thomas E McKone, Deborah H Bennett.   

Abstract

Reliable exposure-based chemical characterization tools are needed to evaluate and prioritize in a rapid and efficient manner the more than tens of thousands of chemicals in current use. This study applies intake fraction (iF), the integrated incremental intake of a chemical per unit of emission, for a suite of indoor released compounds. A fugacity-based indoor mass-balance model was used to simulate the fate and transport of chemicals for three release scenarios: direct emissions to room air and surface applications to carpet and vinyl. Exposure through inhalation, dermal uptake, and nondietary ingestion was estimated. To compute iF, cumulative intake was summed from all exposure pathways for 20 years based on a scenario with two adults and a 1-year-old child who ages through the simulation. Overall iFs vary by application modes: air release (3.1 × 10(-3) to 6.3 × 10(-3)), carpet application (3.8 × 10(-5) to 6.2 × 10(-3)), and vinyl application (9.0 × 10(-5) to 1.8 × 10(-2)). These iF values serve as initial estimates that offer important insights on variations among chemicals and the potential relative contribution of each pathway over a suite of compounds. The approach from this study is intended for exposure-based prioritization of chemicals released inside homes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22920860     DOI: 10.1021/es3018286

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Technol        ISSN: 0013-936X            Impact factor:   9.028


  14 in total

1.  A Model for Risk-Based Screening and Prioritization of Human Exposure to Chemicals from Near-Field Sources.

Authors:  Li Li; John N Westgate; Lauren Hughes; Xianming Zhang; Babak Givehchi; Liisa Toose; James M Armitage; Frank Wania; Peter Egeghy; Jon A Arnot
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2018-11-27       Impact factor: 9.028

2.  Consensus Modeling of Median Chemical Intake for the U.S. Population Based on Predictions of Exposure Pathways.

Authors:  Caroline L Ring; Jon A Arnot; Deborah H Bennett; Peter P Egeghy; Peter Fantke; Lei Huang; Kristin K Isaacs; Olivier Jolliet; Katherine A Phillips; Paul S Price; Hyeong-Moo Shin; John N Westgate; R Woodrow Setzer; John F Wambaugh
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2018-12-24       Impact factor: 9.028

3.  Stochastic modeling of near-field exposure to parabens in personal care products.

Authors:  Susan A Csiszar; Alexi S Ernstoff; Peter Fantke; Olivier Jolliet
Journal:  J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol       Date:  2016-01-13       Impact factor: 5.563

4.  Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and trace metals in mosque's carpet dust of Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, and their health risk implications.

Authors:  Aarif H El-Mubarak; Ahmed I Rushdi; Khalid F Al-Mutlaq; Falah Z Al Mdawi; Khalid Al-Hazmi; Ramil S Dumenden; Rex A Pascua
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2016-08-06       Impact factor: 4.223

5.  Determining source strength of semivolatile organic compounds using measured concentrations in indoor dust.

Authors:  H-M Shin; T E McKone; M G Nishioka; M D Fallin; L A Croen; I Hertz-Picciotto; C J Newschaffer; D H Bennett
Journal:  Indoor Air       Date:  2013-10-31       Impact factor: 5.770

6.  Application of a combined aggregate exposure pathway and adverse outcome pathway (AEP-AOP) approach to inform a cumulative risk assessment: A case study with phthalates.

Authors:  Rebecca A Clewell; Jeremy A Leonard; Chantel I Nicolas; Jerry L Campbell; Miyoung Yoon; Alina Y Efremenko; Patrick D McMullen; Melvin E Andersen; Harvey J Clewell; Katherine A Phillips; Yu-Mei Tan
Journal:  Toxicol In Vitro       Date:  2020-04-08       Impact factor: 3.500

7.  Conceptual Framework To Extend Life Cycle Assessment Using Near-Field Human Exposure Modeling and High-Throughput Tools for Chemicals.

Authors:  Susan A Csiszar; David E Meyer; Kathie L Dionisio; Peter Egeghy; Kristin K Isaacs; Paul S Price; Kelly A Scanlon; Yu-Mei Tan; Kent Thomas; Daniel Vallero; Jane C Bare
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2016-10-18       Impact factor: 9.028

8.  A framework for an alternatives assessment dashboard for evaluating chemical alternatives applied to flame retardants for electronic applications.

Authors:  Todd M Martin
Journal:  Clean Technol Environ Policy       Date:  2017-05-01       Impact factor: 3.636

9.  Measured concentrations of consumer product chemicals in California house dust: Implications for sources, exposure, and toxicity potential.

Authors:  Hyeong-Moo Shin; Christoph Moschet; Thomas M Young; Deborah H Bennett
Journal:  Indoor Air       Date:  2019-10-24       Impact factor: 5.770

10.  Temporal variability of indoor dust concentrations of semivolatile organic compounds.

Authors:  Kyunghoon Kim; Hyeong-Moo Shin; Luann Wong; Thomas M Young; Deborah H Bennett
Journal:  Indoor Air       Date:  2020-10-23       Impact factor: 5.770

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.