Literature DB >> 22920309

An evaluation of insertion sites for mini-implants: a micro - CT study of human autopsy material.

Morten G Laursen1, Birte Melsen, Paolo M Cattaneo.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: (1) To report the thickness of the cortical bone in insertion sites commonly used for orthodontic mini-implants, (2) to assess the impact of a change in insertion angle on primary cortical bone-to-implant contact, and (3) to evaluate the risk of maxillary sinus perforation.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: At autopsy, 27 human samples containing three to five adjacent teeth were excised and scanned using a table-top micro-computed tomography system. Bone thickness measurements were taken at 45° and 90° to the long the axis of the adjacent teeth, simulating a mini-implant insertion at the mid-root level.
RESULTS: In the maxilla, the overall mean cortical thickness at 90° was 0.7 mm buccally in the lateral region, 1.0 mm buccally in the anterior region, and 1.3 mm palatally. In the mandible, the mean cortical thickness was 0.7 mm buccally and 1.8 mm lingually in the anterior region; 1.9 mm buccally and 2.6 mm lingually in the lateral region. Changing the insertion angle from 90° to 45° increased the cortical bone-to-implant contact by an average of 47%. Perpendicular insertion at the mid-root level only rarely interfered with the sinus, whereas apically inclined insertion increased the risk of sinus perforation.
CONCLUSIONS: Buccally and palatally in the maxilla and buccally in the anterior mandible, the thickness of the alveolar cortical bone is often less than 1 mm. In contrast, the alveolar cortical bone is frequently thicker than 2 mm laterally in the mandible. Changing the insertion angle to 45° will generally enhance implant stability but increase the risk of perforation to the maxillary sinus.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22920309      PMCID: PMC8793663          DOI: 10.2319/042512-344.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Angle Orthod        ISSN: 0003-3219            Impact factor:   2.079


  29 in total

1.  Miniscrew insertion and the maxillary sinus: an endoscopic evaluation.

Authors:  Antonio Gracco; Stephen Tracey; Ugo Baciliero
Journal:  J Clin Orthod       Date:  2010-07

2.  A radiographic evaluation of the availability of bone for placement of miniscrews.

Authors:  Marissa A Schnelle; Frank Michael Beck; Robert M Jaynes; Sarandeep S Huja
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 2.079

3.  Multipurpose use of a single mini-implant for anchorage in an adult patient.

Authors:  Morten Godtfredsen Laursen; Birte Melsen
Journal:  J Clin Orthod       Date:  2009-03

Review 4.  Accounting for measurement error: a critical but often overlooked process.

Authors:  Edward F Harris; Richard N Smith
Journal:  Arch Oral Biol       Date:  2008-07-31       Impact factor: 2.633

5.  Bicortical vs monocortical orthodontic skeletal anchorage.

Authors:  Bryan T Brettin; Nicole M Grosland; Fang Qian; Karin A Southard; Tony D Stuntz; Teresa A Morgan; Steve D Marshall; Thomas E Southard
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 2.650

6.  Buccal cortical bone thickness for mini-implant placement.

Authors:  Sebastian Baumgaertel; Mark G Hans
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 2.650

7.  Accuracy of linear measurement and the measurement limits of thin objects with cone beam computed tomography: effects of measurement directions and of phantom locations in the fields of view.

Authors:  Kimihiro Tsutsumi; Toru Chikui; Kazutoshi Okamura; Kazunori Yoshiura
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants       Date:  2011 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.804

8.  An experimental and clinical study of osseointegrated implants penetrating the nasal cavity and maxillary sinus.

Authors:  P I Brånemark; R Adell; T Albrektsson; U Lekholm; J Lindström; B Rockler
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  1984-08       Impact factor: 1.895

9.  Comparison of cortical bone thickness and root proximity at maxillary and mandibular interradicular sites for orthodontic mini-implant placement.

Authors:  J E Lim; S J Lee; Y J Kim; W H Lim; Y S Chun
Journal:  Orthod Craniofac Res       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 1.826

10.  Tomographic mapping of mandibular interradicular spaces for placement of orthodontic mini-implants.

Authors:  Cristiane Monnerat; Luciana Restle; José Nelson Mucha
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 2.650

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Various Contemporary Intraoral Anchorage Mechanics Supported with Temporary Anchorage Devices.

Authors:  Delal Dara Kılınç; Gülşilay Sayar
Journal:  Turk J Orthod       Date:  2016-12-01

2.  Correlation between tooth size-arch length discrepancy and interradicular distances measured on CBCT and panoramic radiograph: an evaluation for miniscrew insertion.

Authors:  Michele Tepedino; Marie A Cornelis; Claudio Chimenti; Paolo M Cattaneo
Journal:  Dental Press J Orthod       Date:  2018 Sep-Oct

Review 3.  Revisiting the Complications of Orthodontic Miniscrew.

Authors:  Van Mai Truong; Soyeon Kim; Jaeheon Kim; Joo Won Lee; Young-Seok Park
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2022-08-01       Impact factor: 3.246

4.  Average interradicular sites for miniscrew insertion: should dental crowding be considered?

Authors:  Michele Tepedino; Paolo M Cattaneo; Francesco Masedu; Claudio Chimenti
Journal:  Dental Press J Orthod       Date:  2017 Sep-Oct

5.  Anatomical consideration for optimal position of orthodontic miniscrews in the maxilla: a CBCT appraisal.

Authors:  Maha S Al Amri; Hanadi M Sabban; Doaa H Alsaggaf; Fahad F Alsulaimani; Ghassan A Al-Turki; Mohammad S Al-Zahrani; Khalid H Zawawi
Journal:  Ann Saudi Med       Date:  2020-08-06       Impact factor: 1.526

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.