Literature DB >> 22919897

A new approach to the "apparent survival" problem: estimating true survival rates from mark-recapture studies.

James J Gilroy1, Thomas Virzi, Rebecca L Boulton, Julie L Lockwood.   

Abstract

Survival estimates generated from live capture-mark-recapture studies may be negatively biased due to the permanent emigration of marked individuals from the study area. In the absence of a robust analytical solution, researchers typically sidestep this problem by simply reporting estimates using the term "apparent survival." Here, we present a hierarchical Bayesian multistate model designed to estimate true survival by accounting for predicted rates of permanent emigration. Initially we use dispersal kernels to generate spatial projections of dispersal probability around each capture location. From these projections, we estimate emigration probability for each marked individual and use the resulting values to generate bias-adjusted survival estimates from individual capture histories. When tested using simulated data sets featuring variable detection probabilities, survival rates, and dispersal patterns, the model consistently eliminated negative biases shown by apparent survival estimates from standard models. When applied to a case study concerning juvenile survival in the endangered Cape Sable Seaside Sparrow (Ammodramus maritimus mirabilis), bias-adjusted survival estimates increased more than twofold above apparent survival estimates. Our approach is applicable to any capture-mark-recapture study design and should be particularly valuable for organisms with dispersive juvenile life stages.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22919897     DOI: 10.1890/12-0124.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecology        ISSN: 0012-9658            Impact factor:   5.499


  9 in total

1.  Temporally varying disruptive selection in the medium ground finch (Geospiza fortis).

Authors:  Marc-Olivier Beausoleil; Luke O Frishkoff; Leithen K M'Gonigle; Joost A M Raeymaekers; Sarah A Knutie; Luis F De León; Sarah K Huber; Jaime A Chaves; Dale H Clayton; Jennifer A H Koop; Jeffrey Podos; Diana M T Sharpe; Andrew P Hendry; Rowan D H Barrett
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2019-12-04       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Life history and dynamics of a platypus (Ornithorhynchus anatinus) population: four decades of mark-recapture surveys.

Authors:  Gilad Bino; Tom R Grant; Richard T Kingsford
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-11-05       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 3.  Accounting for imperfect detection in ecology: a quantitative review.

Authors:  Kenneth F Kellner; Robert K Swihart
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-10-30       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  ENSO, nest predation risk, food abundance, and male status fail to explain annual variations in the apparent survival rate of a migratory songbird.

Authors:  Alizée Vernouillet; Marc-André Villard; Samuel Haché
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-11-24       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  State space and movement specification in open population spatial capture-recapture models.

Authors:  Beth Gardner; Rahel Sollmann; N Samba Kumar; Devcharan Jathanna; K Ullas Karanth
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2018-09-27       Impact factor: 2.912

6.  Emigration effects on estimates of age- and sex-specific survival of two sciurids.

Authors:  Matthew J Weldy; Damon B Lesmeister; Clinton W Epps
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2022-04-23       Impact factor: 3.167

7.  Juvenile survival in a neotropical migratory songbird is lower than expected.

Authors:  Matthew I McKim-Louder; Jeffrey P Hoover; Thomas J Benson; Wendy M Schelsky
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-02-08       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Recapture heterogeneity in cliff swallows: increased exposure to mist nets leads to net avoidance.

Authors:  Erin A Roche; Charles R Brown; Mary Bomberger Brown; Kristen M Lear
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-03-05       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Climate and density influence annual survival and movement in a migratory songbird.

Authors:  Ann E McKellar; Matthew W Reudink; Peter P Marra; Laurene M Ratcliffe; Scott Wilson
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2015-12-01       Impact factor: 2.912

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.