Literature DB >> 22919220

Evaluation of micronuclei in tobacco users: A study in Punjabi population.

Himanta Bansal1, V Simarpreet Sandhu, Rajat Bhandari, Deepti Sharma.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The assessment of micronuclei in exfoliated cells is a promising tool for the study of epithelial carcinogens and can be used to detect chromosome breakage or mitotic interference, thought to be relevant to carcinogenesis. AIM: The present study aimed to detect micronuclei in exfoliated oral mucosal cells in individuals using various tobacco forms from the last 5 years.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 75 healthy male subjects (25 smokeless tobacco users, 25 smokers, and 25 non-tobacco users) were selected for the study. Smears were obtained with moistened wooden spatula from buccal mucosa and fixed with 95% alcohol. All the cytologic smears were stained by Papanicolaou technique. From each slide, ~1000 cells were examined under the 400× magnification and where micronucleated (MN) cells were located, they were examined under the 1000× magnification. RESULT: MN cells were found to be significantly higher in smokeless tobacco users than in smokers and controls.
CONCLUSION: A positive correlation is found between increased micronucleus frequency and tobacco-using habits. So micronucleus assay can be used as a biomarker of genotoxicity.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Chromosomal aberrations; Papanicolaou stain; exfoliative cytology; genotoxic agents; micronuclei

Year:  2012        PMID: 22919220      PMCID: PMC3425103          DOI: 10.4103/0976-237X.96825

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Contemp Clin Dent        ISSN: 0976-2361


Introduction

Cancer is one of the most common causes of morbidity and mortality today. The global burden of cancer continues to increase mostly because of increasing adoption of cancer-causing behaviors, particularly smoking and smokeless tobacco forms in economically developing countries. Globally, about 5,00,000 new oral and pharyngeal cancers are diagnosed annually and three quarters of these are seen in the developing world, including about 65,000 cases reported in India. The World Health Organization (WHO) estimated that the proportion of deaths that result from tobacco-related diseases will rise in India from 1.4% of all deaths in 1990 to 13.3% of all deaths in 2020. The number of persons consuming tobacco is also likely to rise, according to the models presented in the 2002 report of the Economic and Social Council (ECOSOC) of the United Nations.[12] Oral carcinomas are characterized by complex karyotypes that involve many chromosomal deletions, translocations, and structural abnormalities. Cells often have errors in chromosome segregation that lead to the formation of a lagging chromosome or chromosome parts that become lost during the anaphase stage of cell separation and are excluded from the reforming nuclei. The laggards are observed in the cytoplasm as micronuclei.[3] The micronuclei are extranuclear cytoplasmic bodies associated with chromosomal aberrations. These are induced in oral exfoliated cells by a variety of substances, including genotoxic agents and carcinogenic compounds in tobacco, betel nut, and alcohol. The induction of micronucleated (MN) cells by carcinogens and mutagens is a sign of the genotoxic effect of such substances.[4] These are also observed in exfoliated buccal cells, from people who are exposed to organic solvents, antineoplastic agents, diesel derivatives, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, lead-containing paints and solvents, and drinking water, which is contaminated with arsenic.[3] The assessment of micronuclei in exfoliated cells is a promising tool for the study of epithelial carcinogens and can be used to detect chromosome breakage or mitotic interference, thought to be relevant to carcinogenesis.[5] Due to its association with chromosomal aberrations, micronuclei have been used since 1937 as an indicator of genotoxic exposure based on the radiation studies conducted by Brenneke and Mather.[6] The direct correlation between the micronuclei formation and genomic damage make the micronuclei assay an efficient alteration to the metaphase analysis.[4]

Aim

The present study aimed to detect micronuclei in exfoliated buccal mucosal cells in healthy tobacco users and healthy nontobacco users.

Materials and Methods

A total of 75 healthy male subjects (25 smokeless tobacco users, 25 smokers, and 25 non–tobacco users) who attended the outpatient department of Dental Institute, were examined and were selected for the study. The study group comprised smokeless tobacco chewers who chewed five or more packets daily for at least 5 years. The smokers included smoked every day for at least 5 years and consumed 20 or more bidis/cigarettes in a day. The control group persons were not habituated to any form of tobacco consumption. Individuals who were alcoholics, had a recent viral infection, had undergone radiation therapy, or those who had been under medication were excluded from the study.

Cytologic preparation

Before sampling, each individual rinsed his mouth thoroughly with tap water. The exfoliated cells were obtained by scraping the buccal mucosa with a moistened wooden spatula and the scraped cells were placed on the clean glass slides and smears were prepared. The smears were fixed with 95% ethyl alcohol. All the cytologic smears were stained by Papanicolaou technique using a commercially available staining kit RAPIDPAP. From each slide, ~ 1000 cells were examined under the ×400 magnification and where MN cells were located, they were examined under the 1000× magnification. The criterion which was developed by Tolbert et al was used for counting the micronuclei. Tolbert et al criteria[5] parameters for identifying micronucleus are as follows: Rounded smooth perimeter suggestive of a membrane. Less than a third the diameter of associated nucleus, but large enough to discern shape and color. Staining intensity similar to nucleus. Texture similar to nucleus. Same focal plane as nucleus. Absence of overlap with or bridge to nucleus. Dead or degenerating cells (karyolysis, karyorrhexis, nuclear fragmentation) were excluded from evaluation. Nuclear blebbings (micronucleus-like structure connected with the main nucleus with a bridge) were also not considered.

Results and Analysis

The MN cells observed are shown in Figures 1–3.
Figure 1

Cell with a micronucleus Pap (×1000)

Figure 3

(a) Cell with three micronuclei Pap (×1000); (b) cell with three micronuclei Pap (×1000)

Cell with a micronucleus Pap (×1000) (a) Cell with two micronuclei Pap (×1000); (b) cell with two micronuclei Pap (×1000) (a) Cell with three micronuclei Pap (×1000); (b) cell with three micronuclei Pap (×1000) The frequency of distribution of micronuclei in the three study groups are shown in Figures 4–5.
Figure 4

Number of micronuclei/1000 cells in smokeless tobacco users

Figure 5

Number of micronuclei/1000 cells in smokers

Number of micronuclei/1000 cells in smokeless tobacco users Number of micronuclei/1000 cells in smokers The mean number of micronuclei observed in the three groups are presented in table 1. The mean number of micronuclei in smokeless tobacco chewers, smokers, and controls were 24.13 ± 10.68, 11.96 ± 4.23, and 4.17 ± 2.99, respectively. The mean number of micronuclei found were more in smokeless tobacco chewers as compared with smokers and controls [Table 1].
Table 1

Mean number of micronuclei in three study groups

Mean number of micronuclei in three study groups The mean values and the mean differences, which were obtained from the smokeless tobacco chewers, the smokers, and the controls were compared and are shown in table 2. In comparison, the mean difference between the number of micronuclei in smokeless tobacco chewers and smokers was 12.17 and was statistically significant (P < 0.05). The mean difference between the number of micronuclei in smokeless tobacco chewers and controls was 19.96 and was highly statistically significant (P < 0.05). The mean difference between the number of micronuclei in smokers and controls was 7.79 and was statistically significant (P < 0.05) [Table 2].
Table 2

Multiple comparison of micronuclei in three study groups

Multiple comparison of micronuclei in three study groups

Discussion

Oral carcinogenesis is a multistep process of accumulated genetic damage leading to cell dysregulation with disruption in cell signaling, DNA-repair, and cell cycle events, which are fundamental to hemostasis. These events can be conveniently studied in the buccal mucosa, which is an easily accessible tissue for sampling cells in a minimally invasive manner and does not cause undue stress to study subjects.[5] Oral exfoliative cytology has been used extensively for screening cellular alterations, such as karyolysis, karyorrhexis, micronucleus formation, pyknosis, binucleation, broken egg nucleus, anucleation, and so on[5]. Micronuclei in oral exfoliated cells is a biomarker of chromosomal damage caused by genotoxic agents from tobacco and tobacco-related substances, alcohol, and so on. When the target tissue of interest is epithelial tissue, the exfoliated cell micronucleus assay has been used to assess the genotoxic damage in oral premalignancies and oral squamous cell carcinoma.[78] The present study evaluated the mean number of micronuclei in smokeless tobacco users, smokers, and the healthy control group. The result showed that the overall level of mean number of micronuclei in smokeless tobacco were higher (24.13 ± 10.68) as compared with smokers (11.96 ± 4.23) and controls (4.17 ± 2.99). This observation was similar to those reported by Palaskar et al.,[3] Ozkul et al,[9] and Patel et al,[10] when all the groups were further compared with each other for the mean difference, the result was highly statistically significant (P < 0.05), which was in accordance with the previous studies by Palaskar et al.[3] and Patel et al.,[10] whereas Ozkul et al found no difference between the mean percentage of MN cells for the groups considered (P > 0.05).[9] The incidence of micronuclei has been analyzed by various studies in normal patients, oral premalignancies, and OSCCs.[7] Casartelli et al observed micronuclei frequencies in exfoliated buccal cells in normal oral mucosa, precancerous lesions, and squamous cell carcinoma. They concluded that the gradual increase in micronucleus counts from normal mucosal to precancerous lesions to carcinoma suggested a link of this biomarker with neoplastic progression.[11] A significant rise was also observed in the percentage of MN cells and micronuclei from control to precancer patients, and from precancer to cancer patients in a study by Saran et al.[12] In the present study, the mean number of micronuclei was higher in smokeless tobacco users indicating more genotoxic effect of smokeless tobacco as compared with smoking.

Conclusion

From the present study, increase in the number of micronuclei provides the evidence that smokeless tobacco chewers and smokers may be at a high risk for developing oral cancer. In comparison, the cellular changes associated with smokeless tobacco use were more than that in smokers, thus indicating more carcinogenic potential of smokeless tobacco. Micronucleus assay can be used as a biomarker of genotoxicity and epithelial carcinogenic progression. However, more research is required to establish it as a potential biomarker for oral carcinogenesis.
  6 in total

1.  Exfoliative cytology in screening for malignant and premalignant lesions in the buccal mucosa.

Authors:  T Ramaesh; N Ratnatunga; B R Mendis; S Rajapaksa
Journal:  Ceylon Med J       Date:  1998-12

2.  Induction of micronuclei by smokeless tobacco on buccal mucosa cells of habitual users.

Authors:  Y Ozkul; H Donmez; A Erenmemisoglu; H Demirtas; N Imamoglu
Journal:  Mutagenesis       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 3.000

3.  The induction of micronuclei as a measure of genotoxicity. A report of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Gene-Tox Program.

Authors:  J A Heddle; M Hite; B Kirkhart; K Mavournin; J T MacGregor; G W Newell; M F Salamone
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  1983-09       Impact factor: 2.433

4.  Micronucleus frequencies in exfoliated buccal cells in normal mucosa, precancerous lesions and squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  G Casartelli; S Bonatti; M De Ferrari; M Scala; P Mereu; G Margarino; A Abbondandolo
Journal:  Anal Quant Cytol Histol       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 0.302

5.  Risk assessment of oral cancer in patients with pre-cancerous states of the oral cavity using micronucleus test and challenge assay.

Authors:  Rashmi Saran; Ravindra K Tiwari; Penagaluru Paradhanandan Reddy; Yog Raj Ahuja
Journal:  Oral Oncol       Date:  2007-10-23       Impact factor: 5.337

Review 6.  Tobacco control in India: present scenario and challenges ahead.

Authors:  Tarveen Jandoo; Ravi Mehrotra
Journal:  Asian Pac J Cancer Prev       Date:  2008 Oct-Dec
  6 in total
  16 in total

1.  Evaluation of genotoxic effects in Brazilian agricultural workers exposed to pesticides and cigarette smoke using machine-learning algorithms.

Authors:  Jamile Silveira Tomiazzi; Meire Aparecida Judai; Gisele Alborghetti Nai; Danillo Roberto Pereira; Patricia Alexandra Antunes; Ana Paula Alves Favareto
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2017-10-30       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  Assessment of genotoxicity amongst smokers, alcoholics, and tobacco chewers of North India using micronucleus assay and urinary 8-hydroxyl-2'-deoxyguanosine, as biomarkers.

Authors:  S V S Rana; Yeshvandra Verma; Gagan Deep Singh
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2017-07-12       Impact factor: 2.513

Review 3.  Does smoking habit increase the micronuclei frequency in the oral mucosa of adults compared to non-smokers? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Juliana Larocca de Geus; Letícia Maíra Wambier; Marcelo Carlos Bortoluzzi; Alessandro D Loguercio; Stella Kossatz; Alessandra Reis
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2017-10-24       Impact factor: 3.573

4.  Micronuclei in Exfoliated Oral Epithelial Cells in Tobacco Users and Controls with Various Oral Lesions: A Study from Gujarat, India.

Authors:  Aniruddha Wagh; Jayman Raval; R G Aiyer; Suresh Amin
Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2018-02-02

5.  Assessment of hematological, biochemical effects and genotoxicity among pesticide sprayers in grape garden.

Authors:  Avinash Shivaji Gaikwad; Panjakumar Karunamoorthy; Shridhar Jagannath Kondhalkar; Mala Ambikapathy; Ravichandran Beerappa
Journal:  J Occup Med Toxicol       Date:  2015-03-01       Impact factor: 2.646

6.  Electronic Cigarette: Role in the Primary Prevention of Oral Cavity Cancer.

Authors:  Teresa Franco; Serena Trapasso; Lidia Puzzo; Eugenia Allegra
Journal:  Clin Med Insights Ear Nose Throat       Date:  2016-10-17

7.  Comparative study of frequency of micronuclei in normal, potentially malignant diseases and oral squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Varsha Ajit Sangle; Shobha Bijjaragi; Nishat Shah; Suresh Kangane; Hrishikesh M Ghule; Sr Ashwini Rani
Journal:  J Nat Sci Biol Med       Date:  2016 Jan-Jun

Review 8.  Role of micronucleus in oral exfoliative cytology.

Authors:  R Shashikala; A P Indira; G S Manjunath; K Arathi Rao; B K Akshatha
Journal:  J Pharm Bioallied Sci       Date:  2015-08

9.  Cytological grading: An alternative to histological grading in oral squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Srilekha Namala; Vijay Srinivas Guduru; Anuradha Ananthaneni; Sabitha Devi; Puneeth Horrati Kuberappa; Urmila Udayashankar
Journal:  J Cytol       Date:  2016 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 1.000

10.  Assessment of micronuclei frequency in individuals with a habit of tobacco by means of exfoliated oral buccal cells.

Authors:  Tanvi Dosi; Dhaman Gupta; Alka Hazari; Rajan Rajput; Prabhav Chauhan; Anushri S Rajapuri
Journal:  J Int Soc Prev Community Dent       Date:  2016-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.