OBJECTIVES: Abnormal contrast enhancement on MRI is advocated as a biomarker for inflammation in colitis, although the enhancement kinetics of normal colon are poorly described. Our purpose was to quantitatively assess mural enhancement in normal colon and test for intersegmental differences. METHODS: Eight patients without prior history of inflammatory bowel disease underwent standard MRI colonography followed by normal same-day colonoscopy. Acquired sequences included a volumetric interpolated breath-hold examination (VIBE) to encompass the whole colonic volume, performed at 5°, 10° and 35° flip angles for T(1) quantitation and then at a fixed 35° flip angle three times prior to and every 30 s following intravenous gadoterate meglumine for 220 s. Ascending colon, descending colon and rectal R(1) (1/T(1)) was plotted against time. Mean pre-contrast R(1), initial change of R(1) (ΔR(1)), early and late "plateau phase" enhancement and the area under the R(1)-time (AUC-R(1)) curve were compared between segments using the Student's paired t-test. RESULTS: There was no significant difference of pre-contrast R(1) between segments (p=0.49 to 0.62). ΔR(1) was higher for ascending colon compared with descending colon (0.0023±0.0012 ms(-1) vs 0.0010±0.0011 ms(-1), p=0.03). There was no significant difference for early or late plateau phase R(1) between colonic segments (p=0.08 to 1.00). AUC-R(1) was greater for ascending than descending colon (0.54±0.19 vs 0.30±0.14, p=0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Intersegmental differences in colonic enhancement are present and should be considered when interpreting differential segmental enhancement.
OBJECTIVES: Abnormal contrast enhancement on MRI is advocated as a biomarker for inflammation in colitis, although the enhancement kinetics of normal colon are poorly described. Our purpose was to quantitatively assess mural enhancement in normal colon and test for intersegmental differences. METHODS: Eight patients without prior history of inflammatory bowel disease underwent standard MRI colonography followed by normal same-day colonoscopy. Acquired sequences included a volumetric interpolated breath-hold examination (VIBE) to encompass the whole colonic volume, performed at 5°, 10° and 35° flip angles for T(1) quantitation and then at a fixed 35° flip angle three times prior to and every 30 s following intravenous gadoterate meglumine for 220 s. Ascending colon, descending colon and rectal R(1) (1/T(1)) was plotted against time. Mean pre-contrast R(1), initial change of R(1) (ΔR(1)), early and late "plateau phase" enhancement and the area under the R(1)-time (AUC-R(1)) curve were compared between segments using the Student's paired t-test. RESULTS: There was no significant difference of pre-contrast R(1) between segments (p=0.49 to 0.62). ΔR(1) was higher for ascending colon compared with descending colon (0.0023±0.0012 ms(-1) vs 0.0010±0.0011 ms(-1), p=0.03). There was no significant difference for early or late plateau phase R(1) between colonic segments (p=0.08 to 1.00). AUC-R(1) was greater for ascending than descending colon (0.54±0.19 vs 0.30±0.14, p=0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Intersegmental differences in colonic enhancement are present and should be considered when interpreting differential segmental enhancement.
Authors: Olaf Dietrich; José G Raya; Scott B Reeder; Maximilian F Reiser; Stefan O Schoenberg Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2007-08 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Rehana Hafeez; Shonit Punwani; Doug Pendse; Paul Boulos; Stuart Bloom; Steve Halligan; Stuart A Taylor Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2010-08-30 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Stuart A Taylor; Shonit Punwani; Manuel Rodriguez-Justo; Alan Bainbridge; Rebecca Greenhalgh; Enrico De Vita; Alastair Forbes; Richard Cohen; Alastair Windsor; Austin Obichere; Anika Hansmann; Janaki Rajan; Marco Novelli; Steve Halligan Journal: Radiology Date: 2009-03-10 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Shonit Punwani; Manuel Rodriguez-Justo; Alan Bainbridge; Rebecca Greenhalgh; Enrico De Vita; Stuart Bloom; Richard Cohen; Alastair Windsor; Austin Obichere; Anika Hansmann; Marco Novelli; Steve Halligan; Stuart A Taylor Journal: Radiology Date: 2009-07-27 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: J Rimola; S Rodriguez; O García-Bosch; I Ordás; E Ayala; M Aceituno; M Pellisé; C Ayuso; E Ricart; L Donoso; J Panés Journal: Gut Date: 2009-01-09 Impact factor: 23.059
Authors: David M Lowe; Philip J Smith; Fernando Moreira; Sarita Workman; Helen Braggins; Nikolaos Koukias; Matthew S Buckland; Peter Wylie; Stuart A Taylor; Charles D Murray Journal: J Clin Immunol Date: 2019-06-06 Impact factor: 8.317